Cancer Research Audrey Hepburn  Telomeres
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 56, 345-353, January 15, 1996]
© 1996 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beidler, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, Y.-c.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beidler, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, Y.-c.

Camptothecin Resistance Involving Steps Subsequent to the Formation of Protein-Linked DNA Breaks in Human Camptothecin-resistant KB Cell Lines1

David R. Beidler2, Jang-Yang Chang3, Bing-sen Zhou4 and Yung-chi Cheng5

Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520

To identify mechanisms of camptothecin (CPT) resistance/toxicity, sublines from a human KB cell line were made resistant to CPT by continuous selection in increasing concentrations of CPT. Two CPT-resistant lines, 100 and 300, were 32- and 54-fold resistant to the growth-inhibitory properties of CPT compared to the KB line. After CPT-free culturing, partial revertant lines were established from each resistant line. These partial revertant lines, 100rev and 300rev, were 2.5- and 3.2-fold resistant to CPT compared to KB. When growth inhibition and toxicity were compared, the resistant lines alone displayed an enhanced cytostatic response to CPT. The resistant and partial revertant lines displayed no cross-resistance to etoposide or cisplatin. Comparisons of topoisomerase I (TOP1) activity, content, and protein-linked DNA break production by CPT revealed that resistant and partial revertant lines had one-half the levels as KB, with TOP1 activity that was equally sensitive to CPT in all cell lines tested. However, double-stranded DNA break induction by CPT was significantly reduced only in the resistant lines. Coincubation with 3-aminobenzamide, an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribosyl) polymerase, potentiated CPT toxicity in the resistant lines alone, without affecting CPT: TOP1 interactions. Therefore, CPT resistance in the 100 and 300 lines was characterized by factors independent of TOP1, specific for CPT, and attenuated by poly(ADP-ribosyl) polymerase inhibition. This resistant phenotype produced fewer double-stranded DNA breaks and enhanced a cytostatic response to CPT.

1 This research was supported by NCI Grant CA-44358.

2 Present address: Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.

3 Present address: TriService General Hospital, Taipai, Taiwan, Republic of China.

4 Present address: Department of Oncology and Therapeutic Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010.

5 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Yale University, Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Sterling Hall of Medicine, P.O. Box 208066, New Haven, CT 06520-8066.

Received 7/13/95. Accepted 11/13/95.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
L.-C. Ma, C.-C. Kuo, J.-F. Liu, L.-T. Chen, and J.-Y. Chang
Transcriptional Repression of O6-Methylguanine DNA Methyltransferase Gene Rendering Cells Hypersensitive to N,N'-Bis(2-chloroethyl)-N-nitrosurea in Camptothecin-Resistant Cells
Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2008; 74(2): 517 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
S.-Y. Park, C.-H. Leung, and Y.-C. Cheng
ATP Modulates Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1-Facilitated Topoisomerase I-Linked DNA Religation in the Presence of Camptothecin
Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2008; 73(6): 1829 - 1837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
C.-C. Kuo, J.-F. Liu, and J.-Y. Chang
DNA Repair Enzyme, O6-Methylguanine DNA Methyltransferase, Modulates Cytotoxicity of Camptothecin-Derived Topoisomerase I Inhibitors
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2006; 316(2): 946 - 954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S.-Y. Park and Y.-C. Cheng
Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1 Could Facilitate the Religation of Topoisomerase I-linked DNA Inhibited by Camptothecin
Cancer Res., May 1, 2005; 65(9): 3894 - 3902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
T. E. Kim, S.-Y. Park, C.-H. Hsu, G. E. Dutschman, and Y.-C. Cheng
Synergistic Antitumor Activity of Troxacitabine and Camptothecin in Selected Human Cancer Cell Lines
Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2004; 66(2): 285 - 292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
W. Gao, W. Lam, S. Zhong, C. Kaczmarek, D. C. Baker, and Y.-C. Cheng
Novel Mode of Action of Tylophorine Analogs as Antitumor Compounds
Cancer Res., January 15, 2004; 64(2): 678 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
Y. Xu and M. A. Villalona-Calero
Irinotecan: mechanisms of tumor resistance and novel strategies for modulating its activity
Ann. Onc., December 1, 2002; 13(12): 1841 - 1851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S.-Y. Park, W. Lam, and Y.-c. Cheng
X-ray Repair Cross-Complementing Gene I Protein Plays an Important Role in Camptothecin Resistance
Cancer Res., January 1, 2002; 62(2): 459 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
H. Komatani, M. Morita, N. Sakaizumi, K. Fukasawa, E. Yoshida, A. Okura, T. Yoshinari, and S. Nishimura
A New Mechanism of Acquisition of Drug Resistance by Partial Duplication of Topoisomerase I
Cancer Res., June 1, 1999; 59(11): 2701 - 2708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
Q. Fu, S.-W. Kim, H.-X. Chen, S. Grill, and Y.-C. Cheng
Degradation of Topoisomerase I Induced by Topoisomerase I Inhibitors Is Dependent on Inhibitor Structure but Independent of Cell Death
Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 1999; 55(4): 677 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. J. D. Reid, E. A. Kauh, and M.-A. Bjornsti
Camptothecin Sensitivity Is Mediated by the Pleiotropic Drug Resistance Network in Yeast
J. Biol. Chem., May 2, 1997; 272(18): 12091 - 12099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. K. Edwards, A. Saleem, J. A. Shaman, T. Dennis, C. Gerigk, E. Oliveros, M. R. Gartenberg, and E. H. Rubin
Role for Nucleolin/Nsr1 in the Cellular Localization of Topoisomerase I
J. Biol. Chem., November 10, 2000; 275(46): 36181 - 36188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1996 by the American Association for Cancer Research.