Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 56, 1283-1290, March 15, 1996]
© 1996 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dehal, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kupfer, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dehal, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kupfer, D.

Evidence That the Catechol 3,4-Dihydroxytamoxifen Is a Proximate Intermediate to the Reactive Species Binding Covalently to Proteins1,2,

Shangara S. Dehal and David Kupfer3

Worcester Foundation for Biomedical Research, Shrewsbury, Massachusetts 01545

Metabolism of tamoxifen by rat and human hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450s (CYPs) forms a reactive intermediate that irreversibly binds to microsomal proteins (C. Mani and D. Kupfer, Cancer Res., 51: 6052–6058, 1991). The current study examines the nature of the tamoxifen metabolite that is proximate to the reactive intermediate(s). The rate of covalent binding of tamoxifen metabolites, tamoxifen N-oxide, N-desmethyltamoxifen, and tamoxifen N-oxide-epoxide was approximately equal to or less than that of tamoxifen. By contrast, covalent binding of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OH-tam) was 3–5-fold higher than that of tamoxifen, indicating that among the metabolites examined, 4-OH-tam or its metabolite(s) is most proximate to the reactive intermediate(s). Incubation of 4-OH-tam with liver microsomes from PCN-treated rat yielded three detectable metabolites. One was identified as 4-OH-tam N-oxide via its facile reduction back to 4-OH-tam by titanium(III) chloride. Another metabolite of 4-OH-tam, assumed to be 3,4-dihydroxytamoxifen (3,4-di-OH-tam) catechol, was demonstrated by its monomethylation with [3H]S-adenosyl-L-methionine ([3H]SAM) in the presence of endogenous catechol-O-methyltransferase. Monomethylated catechol from 4-OH-tam was formed at a 3–4-fold higher rate than from tamoxifen. It was reasoned that if the catechol is the most proximate metabolite to the reactive intermediate, then its methylation would reduce the formation of the reactive intermediate and result in lower rate of covalent binding. In fact, addition of radioinert SAM to incubations of tamoxifen inhibited covalent binding by 17–23%. By contrast, inclusion of 1.0 mM S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine, a potent inhibitor of catechol-O-methyltransferase-mediated methylation of 3,4-di-OH-tam, essentially overcame the inhibition of the covalent binding by SAM. Additionally, ascorbic acid and glutathione, inhibitors of covalent binding of tamoxifen, produced an elevation of methylated catechol. These findings collectively indicate that 3,4-di-OH-tam is proximate to the ultimate reactive intermediate that results in covalent binding to microsomal proteins.

1 A preliminary account of a portion of this study was presented at the Sixth International Society for the Study of Xenobiotics Meeting (1994) in Raleigh, North Carolina.

2 Financial support provided by United States Public Health Service Grant ES00834 from the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences is gratefully acknowledged.

3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Worcester Foundation for Biomedical Research, 222 Maple Avenue, Shrewsbury, MA 01545. Phone: (508) 842-8921; Fax: (508) 842-9632.

Received 10/11/95. Accepted 1/12/96.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
C. Sridar, U. M. Kent, L. M. Notley, E. M. J. Gillam, and P. F. Hollenberg
Effect of Tamoxifen on the Enzymatic Activity of Human Cytochrome CYP2B6
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2002; 301(3): 945 - 952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
D. Blizard, T. Sueyoshi, M. Negishi, S. S. Dehal, and D. Kupfer
Mechanism of Induction of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes by the Proestrogenic Endocrine Disruptor Pesticide-Methoxychlor: Interactions of Methoxychlor Metabolites with the Constitutive Androstane Receptor System
Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 2001; 29(6): 781 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
P. W. Fan and J. L. Bolton
Bioactivation of Tamoxifen to Metabolite E Quinone Methide: Reaction with Glutathione and DNA
Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 2001; 29(6): 891 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. Schiff, P. Reddy, M. Ahotupa, E. Coronado-Heinsohn, M. Grim, S. G. Hilsenbeck, R. Lawrence, S. Deneke, R. Herrera, G. C. Chamness, et al.
Oxidative Stress and AP-1 Activity in Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Tumors In Vivo
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 6, 2000; 92(23): 1926 - 1934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
W. Davis, A. Hewer, K. M. Rajkowski, W. Meinl, H. Glatt, and D. H. Phillips
Sex Differences in the Activation of Tamoxifen to DNA Binding Species in Rat Liver in Vivo and in Rat Hepatocytes in Vitro: Role of Sulfotransferase Induction
Cancer Res., June 1, 2000; 60(11): 2887 - 2891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
M. Kawai, S. M. Bandiera, T. K. H. Chang, F. M. Poulet, P. M. Vancutsem, and G. D. Bellward
Modulation of Hepatic CYP2A1, CYP2C11, and CYP3A9 Expression in Adult Rats by Neonatal Administration of Tamoxifen
Drug Metab. Dispos., December 1, 1999; 27(12): 1392 - 1398.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
I. N.H. White
The tamoxifen dilemma
Carcinogenesis, July 1, 1999; 20(7): 1153 - 1160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
S. S. Dehal and D. Kupfer
Cytochrome P-450 3A and 2D6 Catalyze Ortho Hydroxylation of 4-Hydroxytamoxifen and 3-Hydroxytamoxifen (Droloxifene) Yielding Tamoxifen Catechol: Involvement of Catechols in Covalent Binding to Hepatic Proteins
Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 1999; 27(6): 681 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
S. S. Dehal, A. M. H. Brodie, and D. Kupfer
The Aromatase Inactivator 4-Hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OH-A) Inhibits Tamoxifen Metabolism by Rat Hepatic Cytochrome P-450 3A: Potential for Drug-Drug Interaction of Tamoxifen and 4-OH-A in Combined Anti-Breast Cancer Therapy
Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 1999; 27(3): 389 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1996 by the American Association for Cancer Research.