| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Worcester Foundation for Biomedical Research, Shrewsbury, Massachusetts 01545
Metabolism of tamoxifen by rat and human hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450s (CYPs) forms a reactive intermediate that irreversibly binds to microsomal proteins (C. Mani and D. Kupfer, Cancer Res., 51: 60526058, 1991). The current study examines the nature of the tamoxifen metabolite that is proximate to the reactive intermediate(s). The rate of covalent binding of tamoxifen metabolites, tamoxifen N-oxide, N-desmethyltamoxifen, and tamoxifen N-oxide-epoxide was approximately equal to or less than that of tamoxifen. By contrast, covalent binding of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OH-tam) was 35-fold higher than that of tamoxifen, indicating that among the metabolites examined, 4-OH-tam or its metabolite(s) is most proximate to the reactive intermediate(s). Incubation of 4-OH-tam with liver microsomes from PCN-treated rat yielded three detectable metabolites. One was identified as 4-OH-tam N-oxide via its facile reduction back to 4-OH-tam by titanium(III) chloride. Another metabolite of 4-OH-tam, assumed to be 3,4-dihydroxytamoxifen (3,4-di-OH-tam) catechol, was demonstrated by its monomethylation with [3H]S-adenosyl-L-methionine ([3H]SAM) in the presence of endogenous catechol-O-methyltransferase. Monomethylated catechol from 4-OH-tam was formed at a 34-fold higher rate than from tamoxifen. It was reasoned that if the catechol is the most proximate metabolite to the reactive intermediate, then its methylation would reduce the formation of the reactive intermediate and result in lower rate of covalent binding. In fact, addition of radioinert SAM to incubations of tamoxifen inhibited covalent binding by 1723%. By contrast, inclusion of 1.0 mM S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine, a potent inhibitor of catechol-O-methyltransferase-mediated methylation of 3,4-di-OH-tam, essentially overcame the inhibition of the covalent binding by SAM. Additionally, ascorbic acid and glutathione, inhibitors of covalent binding of tamoxifen, produced an elevation of methylated catechol. These findings collectively indicate that 3,4-di-OH-tam is proximate to the ultimate reactive intermediate that results in covalent binding to microsomal proteins.
1 A preliminary account of a portion of this study was presented at the Sixth International Society for the Study of Xenobiotics Meeting (1994) in Raleigh, North Carolina.
2 Financial support provided by United States Public Health Service Grant ES00834 from the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences is gratefully acknowledged.
3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Worcester Foundation for Biomedical Research, 222 Maple Avenue, Shrewsbury, MA 01545. Phone: (508) 842-8921; Fax: (508) 842-9632.
Received 10/11/95. Accepted 1/12/96.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Sridar, U. M. Kent, L. M. Notley, E. M. J. Gillam, and P. F. Hollenberg Effect of Tamoxifen on the Enzymatic Activity of Human Cytochrome CYP2B6 J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2002; 301(3): 945 - 952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Blizard, T. Sueyoshi, M. Negishi, S. S. Dehal, and D. Kupfer Mechanism of Induction of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes by the Proestrogenic Endocrine Disruptor Pesticide-Methoxychlor: Interactions of Methoxychlor Metabolites with the Constitutive Androstane Receptor System Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 2001; 29(6): 781 - 785. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Fan and J. L. Bolton Bioactivation of Tamoxifen to Metabolite E Quinone Methide: Reaction with Glutathione and DNA Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 2001; 29(6): 891 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. Schiff, P. Reddy, M. Ahotupa, E. Coronado-Heinsohn, M. Grim, S. G. Hilsenbeck, R. Lawrence, S. Deneke, R. Herrera, G. C. Chamness, et al. Oxidative Stress and AP-1 Activity in Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Tumors In Vivo J Natl Cancer Inst, December 6, 2000; 92(23): 1926 - 1934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Davis, A. Hewer, K. M. Rajkowski, W. Meinl, H. Glatt, and D. H. Phillips Sex Differences in the Activation of Tamoxifen to DNA Binding Species in Rat Liver in Vivo and in Rat Hepatocytes in Vitro: Role of Sulfotransferase Induction Cancer Res., June 1, 2000; 60(11): 2887 - 2891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kawai, S. M. Bandiera, T. K. H. Chang, F. M. Poulet, P. M. Vancutsem, and G. D. Bellward Modulation of Hepatic CYP2A1, CYP2C11, and CYP3A9 Expression in Adult Rats by Neonatal Administration of Tamoxifen Drug Metab. Dispos., December 1, 1999; 27(12): 1392 - 1398. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
I. N.H. White The tamoxifen dilemma Carcinogenesis, July 1, 1999; 20(7): 1153 - 1160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Dehal and D. Kupfer Cytochrome P-450 3A and 2D6 Catalyze Ortho Hydroxylation of 4-Hydroxytamoxifen and 3-Hydroxytamoxifen (Droloxifene) Yielding Tamoxifen Catechol: Involvement of Catechols in Covalent Binding to Hepatic Proteins Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 1999; 27(6): 681 - 688. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Dehal, A. M. H. Brodie, and D. Kupfer The Aromatase Inactivator 4-Hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OH-A) Inhibits Tamoxifen Metabolism by Rat Hepatic Cytochrome P-450 3A: Potential for Drug-Drug Interaction of Tamoxifen and 4-OH-A in Combined Anti-Breast Cancer Therapy Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 1999; 27(3): 389 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |