Cancer Research Donn Young  Genetics and Biology of Brain Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 58, 2766-2771, July 1, 1998]
© 1998 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heimann, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hellman, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Heimann, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hellman, S.

The Relationship between nm23, Angiogenesis, and the Metastatic Proclivity of Node-negative Breast Cancer1

Ruth Heimann2, Donald J. Ferguson and Samuel Hellman

Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology [R. H., S. H.] and Department of Surgery, Division of the Biological Sciences [D. J. F.], The Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637

Distant metastases are the major cause of morbidity and mortality in women with breast cancer. The prediction of this metastatic proclivity is essential in determining prognosis and should allow an appropriate choice of therapy. A critical look at the metastatic process and its phenotypic expression offers an opportunity to identify some of the important events in the process that may relate to prognosis, with the goal of identifying those patients with occult metastases and also sparing systemic treatment in those patients whose tumors have not developed the capacity for distant spread. To evaluate the significance of nm23 and angiogenesis in the metastatic cascade, we used archival material from 163 node-negative breast cancer patients who had a median follow-up of 14 years. All patients underwent mastectomy and received no adjuvant chemotherapy or hormone or radiation therapy. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect nm23-H1 expression, whereas angiogenesis was determined by microvessel count (MVC). We found the 15-year disease-free survival (DFS) to be significantly better in patients with high nm23 compared with low nm23 (91% compared with 70%, P = 0.008). Low MVC is associated with excellent (92%) long-term DFS. In those patients with high MVC, high nm23 allows the identification of a subgroup with significantly higher DFS (90% compared with 66%, P = 0.02). Among high nuclear grade tumors, if nm23 is high, the DFS is significantly better (89% compared with 68%, P = 0.03). Thus, nm23 is still associated with excellent survival, even when there is unfavorable angiogenesis or nuclear grade. Multivariate analysis confirms that nm23 and MVC are important prognostic factors. High MVC appears necessary but not sufficient for metastasis to occur, whereas low nm23 may further contribute to metastatic progression. Both nm23 and MVC contribute valuable information in characterizing the malignant phenotype.

1 This research was partially supported by a grant from the Sidney Kimmel Foundation for Cancer Research.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, MC 9006, 5758 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637. Phone: (773) 702-5194; Fax: (773) 834-7340; E-mail: heimann@rover.uchicago.edu.

Received 3/ 4/98. Accepted 5/14/98.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. S. Steeg, C. E. Horak, and K. D. Miller
Clinical-Translational Approaches to the Nm23-H1 Metastasis Suppressor
Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2008; 14(16): 5006 - 5012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
D. C. Lee, Y. K. Kang, W. H. Kim, Y. J. Jang, D. J. Kim, I. Y. Park, B. H. Sohn, H. A. Sohn, H. G. Lee, J. S. Lim, et al.
Functional and Clinical Evidence for NDRG2 as a Candidate Suppressor of Liver Cancer Metastasis
Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 68(11): 4210 - 4220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
P. S. Steeg
PERSPECTIVES ON CLASSIC ARTICLES: Metastasis Suppressor Genes
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 17, 2004; 96(6): E4 - E4.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
A N J Graham, P Maxwell, K Mulholland, A H Patterson, N Anderson, K G McManus, H Bharucha, and J A McGuigan
Increased nm23 immunoreactivity is associated with selective inhibition of systemic tumour cell dissemination
J. Clin. Pathol., March 1, 2002; 55(3): 184 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y.-H. Tseng, D. Vicent, J. Zhu, Y. Niu, A. Adeyinka, J. S. Moyers, P. H. Watson, and C. R. Kahn
Regulation of Growth and Tumorigenicity of Breast Cancer Cells by the Low Molecular Weight GTPase Rad and Nm23
Cancer Res., March 1, 2001; 61(5): 2071 - 2079.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. T. Hartsough, S. E. Clare, M. Mair, A. G. Elkahloun, D. Sgroi, C. K. Osborne, G. Clark, and P. S. Steeg
Elevation of Breast Carcinoma Nm23-H1 Metastasis Suppressor Gene Expression and Reduced Motility by DNA Methylation Inhibition
Cancer Res., March 1, 2001; 61(5): 2320 - 2327.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
B. A. Yoshida, M. M. Sokoloff, D. R. Welch, and C. W. Rinker-Schaeffer
Metastasis-Suppressor Genes: a Review and Perspective on an Emerging Field
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 1, 2000; 92(21): 1717 - 1730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. Heimann and S. Hellman
Clinical Progression of Breast Cancer Malignant Behavior: What to Expect and When to Expect it
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2000; 18(3): 591 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. Heimann, F. Lan, R. McBride, and S. Hellman
Separating Favorable from Unfavorable Prognostic Markers in Breast Cancer: The Role of E-Cadherin
Cancer Res., January 1, 2000; 60(2): 298 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1998 by the American Association for Cancer Research.