This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tampellini, M. Articles by Lévi, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tampellini, M. Articles by Lévi, F.

Docetaxel Chronopharmacology in Mice¹

Laboratoire Rythmes Biologiques et Chronothérapeutique (Université Paris XI), Institut du Cancer et d'Immunogénétique, Hôpital Paul Brousse, 94800 Villejuif, France [M. T., E. F., X. H. L., G. L., X. M. L., F. L.]; Università degli studi di Torino, Clinica Medica Generale, Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliera San Luigi di Orbassano, Torino, Italy [M. T.]; and Rhône-Poulenc Rorer S.A., Centre de Recherche de Vitry-Alfortville, 94403 Vitry sur Seine, France [P. V., M. C. B.]

Docetaxel tolerance and antitumor efficacy could be enhanced if drug administration was adapted to circadian rhythms. This hypothesis was investigated in seven experiments involving a total of 626 male B6D2F₁ mice, synchronized with an alternation of 12 h of light and 12 h of darkness (12:12), after i.v. administration of docetaxel. In experiment (Exp) 1, the drug was given once a week (wk) for 6 wks (20 mg/kg/wk) or for 5 wks (30 mg/kg/wk) at one of six circadian times, during light when mice were resting [3, 7, or 11 hours after light onset (HALO)], or during darkness, when mice were active (15, 19, or 23 HALO). Endpoints were survival and body weight change. In Exp 2 and 3, docetaxel (30 mg/kg/wk) was administered twice, 1 wk apart, at one of four circadian stages (7, 11, 19, or 23 HALO). Endpoints were hematological and intestinal toxicities. In Exp 4, circadian changes in cell cycle phase distribution and BCL-2 immunofluorescence were investigated in bone marrow as possible mechanisms of docetaxel tolerability rhythm. In Exp 5 to 7, docetaxel was administered to mice bearing measurable P03 pancreatic adenocarcinoma (270–370 mg), with tumor weight and survival as endpoints. Mice from Exp 5 and 6 received a weekly schedule of docetaxel at one of six circadian stages (20 or 30 mg/kg/wk at 3, 7, 11, 15, 19, or 23 HALO). In Exp 7, docetaxel (30 mg/kg) was given every 2 days (day 1, 3, 5 schedule) at 7, 11, 19, or 23 HALO.

Docetaxel dosing in the second half of darkness (19 or 23 HALO) resulted in significantly worse toxicity than its administration during the light span (3, 7, or 11 HALO). The survival rate ranged from 56.3% in the mice treated at 23 HALO to 93.8 or 87.5% in those injected at 3 or 11 HALO, respectively (Exp 1, P < 0.01). Granulocytopenia at nadir was -49 ± 14% at 7 HALO compared with -84 ± 3% at 19 HALO (Exp 2 and 3, P < 0.029), and severe jejunal mucosa necrosis occurred in 5 of 8 mice treated at 23 HALO as opposed to 2 of 18 receiving docetaxel at 7, 11, or 19 HALO (Exp 2 and 3, P < 0.02). The time of least docetaxel toxicity corresponded to the circadian nadir in S or G₂-M phase and to the circadian maximum in BCL-2 immunofluorescence in bone marrow. Docetaxel increased the median survival of tumor-bearing mice in a dose-dependent manner (controls: 24 days; 20 mg/kg weekly, 33 days; 30 mg/kg weekly or day 1, 3, 5 schedule, 44 or 46 days, respectively; Exp 5–7). Survival curves of treated mice differed significantly according to dosing time for each dose and schedule (P from log rank <0.003 to P < 0.03). In Exp 5 and 6, the percentage of increase in life span was largest if docetaxel was administered weekly at 7 HALO (20 mg/kg, 220%; 30 mg/kg, 372%) and lowest after docetaxel dosing at 19 HALO (80% with 20 mg/kg) or at 15 HALO (78% with 30 mg/kg). In Exp 7, (day 1, 3, 5 schedule), docetaxel was most active at 11 HALO (percentage increase in life span, 390%) and least active at 23 HALO (210%). Docetaxel tolerability and antitumor efficacy were simultaneously enhanced by drug dosing in the light span, when mice were resting. Mechanisms underlying the tolerability rhythm likely involved the circadian organization of cell cycle regulation. Docetaxel therapeutic index may be improved with an administration at night in cancer patients, when fewest bone marrow cells are in S or G₂-M phase.

¹ Supported by ARTBC and Rhône-Poulenc Rorer S.A. Presented in part at the 88th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, April 12–16, 1997, San Diego, CA.

² To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Laboratoire Rythmes Biologiques et Chronothérapeutique. Institut du Cancer et d'Immunogénétique, Hôpital Paul Brousse, 94800 Villejuif, France.

Received 5/15/98. Accepted 7/13/98.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Iurisci, E. Filipski, J. Reinhardt, S. Bach, A. Gianella-Borradori, S. Iacobelli, L. Meijer, and F. Levi Improved Tumor Control through Circadian Clock Induction by Seliciclib, a Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor. Cancer Res., November 15, 2006; 66(22): 10720 - 10728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X.-M. Li, S. Kanekal, D. Crepin, C. Guettier, J. Carriere, G. Elliott, and F. Levi Circadian pharmacology of L-alanosine (SDX-102) in mice. Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2006; 5(2): 337 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Tabuchi, H. To, H. Sakaguchi, N. Goto, A. Takeuchi, S. Higuchi, and S. Ohdo Therapeutic Index by Combination of Adriamycin and Docetaxel Depends on Dosing Time in Mice Cancer Res., September 15, 2005; 65(18): 8448 - 8454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Filipski, P. F. Innominato, M. Wu, X.-M. Li, S. Iacobelli, L.-J. Xian, and F. Levi Effects of Light and Food Schedules on Liver and Tumor Molecular Clocks in Mice J Natl Cancer Inst, April 6, 2005; 97(7): 507 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Filipski, V. M. King, M.-C. Etienne, X. Li, B. Claustrat, T. G. Granda, G. Milano, M. H. Hastings, and F. Levi Persistent twenty-four hour changes in liver and bone marrow despite suprachiasmatic nuclei ablation in mice Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2004; 287(4): R844 - R851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Canaple, T. Kakizawa, and V. Laudet The Days and Nights of Cancer Cells Cancer Res., November 15, 2003; 63(22): 7545 - 7552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Filipski, V. M. King, X. Li, T. G. Granda, M.-C. Mormont, X. Liu, B. Claustrat, M. H. Hastings, and F. Levi Host Circadian Clock as a Control Point in Tumor Progression J Natl Cancer Inst, May 1, 2002; 94(9): 690 - 697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. A. Bjarnason, R. C. K. Jordan, P. A. Wood, Q. Li, D. W. Lincoln, R. B. Sothern, W. J. M. Hrushesky, and Y. Ben-David Circadian Expression of Clock Genes in Human Oral Mucosa and Skin : Association with Specific Cell-Cycle Phases Am. J. Pathol., May 1, 2001; 158(5): 1793 - 1801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. G. Granda, E. Filipski, R. M. D’Attino, P. Vrignaud, A. Anjo, M. C. Bissery, and F. Lévi Experimental Chronotherapy of Mouse Mammary Adenocarcinoma MA13/C with Docetaxel and Doxorubicin as Single Agents and in Combination Cancer Res., March 1, 2001; 61(5): 1996 - 2001. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				E. Filipski, S. Amat, G. Lemaigre, M. Vincenti, F. Breillout, and F. A. Lévi Relationship Between Circadian Rhythm of Vinorelbine Toxicity and Efficacy in P388-Bearing Mice J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 1999; 289(1): 231 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text]