Cancer Research Targets  Sign up for Cancer Research eTOC's
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 59, 5106-5111, October 1, 1999]
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hodge, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Schlom, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hodge, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Schlom, J.
[Cancer Research 59, 5106-5111, October 15, 1999]
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research


Advances in Brief

Comparative Studies of a Retrovirus versus a Poxvirus Vector in Whole Tumor-Cell Vaccines

James W. Hodge and Jeffrey Schlom1

Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

A number of experimental and clinical studies have used retroviral vectors to express transgenes in whole tumor-cell vaccines. Recently, poxvirus vectors such as vaccinia or avipox have been used toward this goal. The studies reported here compare for the first time the use of a retroviral vector versus a poxvirus vector (vaccinia) in whole tumor-cell vaccines. The transgene used was the T-cell costimulatory molecule B7-1, and the tumor was the weakly or nonimmunogenic MC38 murine colon adenocarcinoma. Recombinant retrovirus (R-B7) and the recombinant vaccinia (V-B7) induced equivalent expression of B7 on the surface of the carcinoma cell. Using live whole-tumor cells as vaccine, cells transduced via recombinant retrovirus (MC38/R-B7) and recombinant vaccinia (MC38/V-B7) equally induced protection against challenge by native MC38 cells 14 days later. Upon rechallenge with native MC38 cells 40 days later, however, the MC38/R-B7 vaccine was shown to be less effective than the MC38/V-B7 vaccine. Similar results were obtained when the tumor cells were irradiated prior to administration. When comparative studies were conducted in which X-irradiated tumor-cell vaccines were given to mice bearing experimental lung metastases, the MC38/V-B7 vaccine was shown to be significantly (P = 0.0351) more effective than the MC38/R-B7 vaccine. Additional studies were carried out in mice that had received vaccinia virus previously. Again, the X-irradiated MC38/V-B7 vaccine was statistically (P = 0.024) more effective than the MC38/R-B7 vaccine in the elimination of metastases. When the naïve and vaccinia-immune mice for each vaccination group were combined for meta-analysis (n = 16), the MC38/V-B7 was significantly more effective than the MC38/R-B7 in the treatment of pulmonary metastases (P = 0.0014) in this model. These studies thus demonstrate for the first time that a whole tumor-cell vaccine (either live or X-irradiated) containing a vaccinia transgene is at least as efficient, and sometimes more efficient, in inducing antitumor effects compared with the same vaccine using a retrovirus to express the transgene. The implications for the clinical applications of such approaches are discussed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. T. Garnett, J. Schlom, and J. W. Hodge
Combination of Docetaxel and Recombinant Vaccine Enhances T-Cell Responses and Antitumor Activity: Effects of Docetaxel on Immune Enhancement
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 14(11): 3536 - 3544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
C. Palena, K. A. Foon, D. Panicali, A. G. Yafal, J. Chinsangaram, J. W. Hodge, J. Schlom, and K. Y. Tsang
Potential approach to immunotherapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): enhanced immunogenicity of CLL cells via infection with vectors encoding for multiple costimulatory molecules
Blood, November 15, 2005; 106(10): 3515 - 3523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
N. P. Singh, E. S. Yolcu, D. D. Taylor, C. Gercel-Taylor, D. S. Metzinger, S. K. Dreisbach, and H. Shirwan
A Novel Approach to Cancer Immunotherapy: Tumor Cells Decorated with CD80 Generate Effective Antitumor Immunity
Cancer Res., July 15, 2003; 63(14): 4067 - 4073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. von Mehren, P. Arlen, J. Gulley, A. Rogatko, H. S. Cooper, N. J. Meropol, R. K. Alpaugh, M. Davey, S. McLaughlin, M. T. Beard, et al.
The Influence of Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor and Prior Chemotherapy on the Immunological Response to a Vaccine (ALVAC-CEA B7.1) in Patients with Metastatic Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2001; 7(5): 1181 - 1191.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. Sabzevari, J. Kantor, A. Jaigirdar, Y. Tagaya, M. Naramura, J. W. Hodge, J. Bernon, and J. Schlom
Acquisition of CD80 (B7-1) by T Cells
J. Immunol., February 15, 2001; 166(4): 2505 - 2513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1999 by the American Association for Cancer Research.