| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Epidemiology and Prevention |
Department of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center [S-H. L., J-C. L., Y-H. C., T. Y.], Institute of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, National Taiwan University [C-J. C.], and Disease Surveillance and Quarantine Service, Department of Health [T-N. W.], Taipei 100; and Department of Public Health, ChangGung University, TaoYuan, 333 [L-L. H.], Taiwan, Republic of China
To examine whether biomarkers such as sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) and chromosome aberrations (CAs) can predict cancer development, a nested case-control study was performed in a blackfoot endemic area with a known high cancer risk. A cohort of 686 residents was recruited from three villages in the blackfoot endemic area. Personal characteristics were collected, and venous blood was drawn for lymphocyte culture and stored in a refrigerator. The vital status and cancer development were followed using the National Death Registry, Cancer Registry, and Blackfoot Disease Registry. The follow-up period was from August 1991 to July 1995. During this 4-year period, 31 residents developed various types of cancer. Blood culture samples from nine of these subjects were unsuitable for experiments due to improper storage. Finally, a total of 22 cancer cases had cytogenetic samples that could be analyzed. Twenty-two control subjects were selected from those who did not develop cancer in the study period, and these subjects were matched to cases by sex, age, smoking habits, and residential area. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the frequencies of SCE and chromatid-type CAs between the case and control groups. However, the frequencies of chromosome-type CAs, e.g., chromosome-type gaps, chromosome-type breaks, chromosome-type breaks plus exchanges, total chromosome-type aberrations, and total frequencies of CAs in the case group, were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The odds ratio of cancer risk in subjects with more than zero chromosome-type breaks was 5.0 (95% confidence interval = 1.0922.82) compared to those with zero chromosomal breaks. The odds ratios for more than zero chromosome-type breaks plus exchanges and a frequency of total chromosome-type aberrations of >1.007% were 11.0 and 12.0, respectively (P < 0.05). Subjects with a total CA frequency of >4.023% had a 9-fold increase for cancer risk. These results indicate that chromosome-type CAs are good biomarkers for the prediction of cancer development, whereas SCEs and chromatid-type CAs cannot predict cancer risk.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. A. El-Zein, M. Fenech, M. S. Lopez, M. R. Spitz, and C. J. Etzel Cytokinesis-Blocked Micronucleus Cytome Assay Biomarkers Identify Lung Cancer Cases Amongst Smokers Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2008; 17(5): 1111 - 1119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Banerjee, J. Sarkar, J. K. Das, A. Mukherjee, A. K. Sarkar, L. Mondal, and A. K. Giri Polymorphism in the ERCC2 codon 751 is associated with arsenic-induced premalignant hyperkeratosis and significant chromosome aberrations Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2007; 28(3): 672 - 676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Boffetta, O. van der Hel, H. Norppa, E. Fabianova, A. Fucic, S. Gundy, J. Lazutka, A. Cebulska-Wasilewska, D. Puskailerova, A. Znaor, et al. Chromosomal Aberrations and Cancer Risk: Results of a Cohort Study from Central Europe Am. J. Epidemiol., January 1, 2007; 165(1): 36 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. El-Zein, M. B. Schabath, C. J. Etzel, M. S. Lopez, J. D. Franklin, and M. R. Spitz Cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay as a novel biomarker for lung cancer risk. Cancer Res., June 15, 2006; 66(12): 6449 - 6456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Basu, P. Ghosh, J. K. Das, A. Banerjee, K. Ray, and A. K. Giri Micronuclei as Biomarkers of Carcinogen Exposure in Populations Exposed to Arsenic Through Drinking Water in West Bengal, India: A Comparative Study in Three Cell Types Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2004; 13(5): 820 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mahata, P. Ghosh, J. N. Sarkar, K. Ray, A. T. Natarajan, and A. K. Giri Effect of sodium arsenite on peripheral lymphocytes in vitro: individual susceptibility among a population exposed to arsenic through the drinking water Mutagenesis, May 1, 2004; 19(3): 223 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Pepe, H. Janes, G. Longton, W. Leisenring, and P. Newcomb Limitations of the Odds Ratio in Gauging the Performance of a Diagnostic, Prognostic, or Screening Marker Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2004; 159(9): 882 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Hagmar, U. Stromberg, S. Bonassi, I.-L. Hansteen, L. E. Knudsen, C. Lindholm, and H. Norppa Impact of Types of Lymphocyte Chromosomal Aberrations on Human Cancer Risk: Results from Nordic and Italian Cohorts Cancer Res., March 15, 2004; 64(6): 2258 - 2263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-L. Cheng, H.-Y. Ho, Y.-W. Huang, F.-J. Lu, and D. T.-Y. Chiu Humic Acid Induces Oxidative DNA Damage, Growth Retardation, and Apoptosis in Human Primary Fibroblasts Experimental Biology and Medicine, April 1, 2003; 228(4): 413 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-H. Yih, K. Peck, and T.-C. Lee Changes in gene expression profiles of human fibroblasts in response to sodium arsenite treatment Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2002; 23(5): 867 - 876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Cantor Invited Commentary: Arsenic and Cancer of the Urinary Tract Am. J. Epidemiol., March 1, 2001; 153(5): 419 - 421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bonassi, L. Hagmar, U. Strömberg, A. H. Montagud, H. Tinnerberg, A. Forni, P. Heikkilä, S. Wanders, P. Wilhardt, I.-L. Hansteen, et al. Chromosomal Aberrations in Lymphocytes Predict Human Cancer Independently of Exposure to Carcinogens Cancer Res., March 1, 2000; 60(6): 1619 - 1625. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |