This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fujii, H. Articles by Shirai, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fujii, H. Articles by Shirai, T.

Frequent Genetic Heterogeneity in the Clonal Evolution of Gynecological Carcinosarcoma and Its Influence on Phenotypic Diversity¹

Departments of Pathology II [H. F., Z. X. G., Y. H., T. S.], Pathology I [T. M.], and Obstetrics/Gynecology [M. Y.], Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan; Department of Pathology I, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan [M. F.]; and Departments of Pathology [E. G., R. H. H.] and Oncology Center [E. G.], Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287

Carcinosarcomas of the uterus, ovaries, and fallopian tubes are highly aggressive neoplasms with incompletely understood histogenesis. Although recent immunohistochemical, cell culture, and molecular genetic studies all favor these cancers to be monoclonal in origin, the extent of intratumoral genetic heterogeneity in these tumors with divergent histology has not been reported previously. For this study, we microdissected a total of 172 carcinomatous or sarcomatous foci from 17 gynecological carcinosarcomas and analyzed allelic status with 41 microsatellite markers on chromosomal arms 1p, 1q, 3p, 4q, 5q, 6q, 8p, 9p, 10q, 11p, 11q, 13q, 16q, 17p, 17q, 18q, and 22q. With the exception of a single case with microsatellite instability, we found shared allelic losses and retentions among multiple individually dissected foci of each case, strongly supportive of the concept of a monoclonal origin for these neoplasms. In eight of these cases, we also found heterogeneous patterns of allelic loss at limited numbers of chromosomal loci in either the carcinomatous or sarcomatous components of the neoplasms. These heterogeneous patterns of allelic losses were consistent with either genetic progression or genetic diversion occurring during the clonal evolution of these neoplasms. In two cases, we found the specific patterns of genetic progression to be consistent with sarcomatous components of the neoplasms arising from carcinomatous components. We conclude that most of the gynecological carcinosarcomas have a monoclonal origin, and that genetic progression and diversion parallel the development of divergent phenotypes in these tumors. Because phenotypically divergent areas of the tumors share numerous genetic alterations, this divergence most likely occurs relatively late in the evolution of these tumors.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Saegusa, M. Hashimura, T. Kuwata, and I. Okayasu Requirement of the Akt/{beta}-Catenin Pathway for Uterine Carcinosarcoma Genesis, Modulating E-Cadherin Expression Through the Transactivation of Slug Am. J. Pathol., June 1, 2009; 174(6): 2107 - 2115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. W. Klymkowsky and P. Savagner Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition: A Cancer Researcher's Conceptual Friend and Foe Am. J. Pathol., May 1, 2009; 174(5): 1588 - 1593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Stringer, J. S. Larson, J. M. Fischer, M. Medvedovic, M. N. Hersh, G. P. Boivin, and S. L. Stringer Modeling variation in tumors in vivo PNAS, February 15, 2005; 102(7): 2408 - 2413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H Fujii, K Ichikawa, T Takagaki, Y Nakanishi, M Ikegami, S Hirose, and T Shimoda Genetic evolution of {alpha} fetoprotein producing gastric cancer J. Clin. Pathol., December 1, 2003; 56(12): 942 - 949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Gonzalez-Garcia, R. V. Sole, and J. Costa Metapopulation dynamics and spatial heterogeneity in cancer PNAS, October 1, 2002; 99(20): 13085 - 13089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W G McCluggage Malignant biphasic uterine tumours: carcinosarcomas or metaplastic carcinomas? J. Clin. Pathol., May 1, 2002; 55(5): 321 - 325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]