Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2010  Telomeres
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heimann, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hellman, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heimann, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hellman, S.
[Cancer Research 60, 298-304, January 15, 2000]
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Clinical Investigations

Separating Favorable from Unfavorable Prognostic Markers in Breast Cancer: The Role of E-Cadherin

Ruth Heimann1, Fusheng Lan, Russell McBride and Samuel Hellman

Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637

Distant metastases are the major cause of morbidity and mortality in women with breast cancer. The ability to predict the metastatic proclivity is essential in choosing the optimal treatment. Tumor size and grade, which are frequently used markers in node-negative breast cancer patients, are inadequate markers for prognosis and individualized treatment design. The steps in metastatic progression include angiogenesis, invasion, and changes in adhesion characteristics. We developed a strategy for choosing biomarkers representing these steps in malignant progression to identify patients with occult metastases who will need chemotherapy and spare those women whose tumors have not developed the capacity to spread. To evaluate the added significance of E-cadherin to that of nm23-H1 and angiogenesis in determining metastatic proclivity, we used archival material from 168 node-negative breast cancer patients who were treated with mastectomy without any adjuvant chemotherapy or hormone therapy. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect E-cadherin and nm23-H1 expression, whereas angiogenesis was determined by microvessel count (MVC) after immunohistochemical staining. The median follow-up is 14 years. We found that E-cadherin is better in identifying the poor prognosis patients. The 14-year disease-free survival (DFS) is 84%, 80%, and 56% in patients with high, intermediate, and low E-cadherin. The worst prognosis group using nm23-H1 and MVC as biomarkers has a 14-year DFS of 62%. In this group, if E-cadherin is low, the 14-year DFS is further decreased to 44%. Nm23-H1 and MVC are better in identifying the good prognosis patients. The long-term DFS is >90% if MVC is low or if nm23-H1 is high. Multivariate analysis shows that E-cadherin, nm23-H1, and MVC are more significant prognostic biomarkers than tumor size or grade. Loss of E-cadherin appears to be a latter step in the metastatic progression compared to angiogenesis and the loss of nm23-H1 expression.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. L. Andarawewa, A. C. Erickson, W. S. Chou, S. V. Costes, P. Gascard, J. D. Mott, M. J. Bissell, and M. H. Barcellos-Hoff
Ionizing Radiation Predisposes Nonmalignant Human Mammary Epithelial Cells to Undergo Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Induced Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition
Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 67(18): 8662 - 8670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Brouxhon, S. Kyrkanides, M. K. O'Banion, R. Johnson, D. A. Pearce, G. M. Centola, J.-n. H. Miller, K. H. McGrath, B. Erdle, G. Scott, et al.
Sequential Down-regulation of E-Cadherin with Squamous Cell Carcinoma Progression: Loss of E-Cadherin via a Prostaglandin E2-EP2 Dependent Posttranslational Mechanism
Cancer Res., August 15, 2007; 67(16): 7654 - 7664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Harigopal, A. J. Berger, R. L. Camp, D. L. Rimm, and H. M. Kluger
Automated Quantitative Analysis of E-Cadherin Expression in Lymph Node Metastases Is Predictive of Survival in Invasive Ductal Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2005; 11(11): 4083 - 4089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. K. Mell, J. J. Meyer, M. Tretiakova, A. Khramtsov, C. Gong, S. D. Yamada, A. G. Montag, and A. J. Mundt
Prognostic Significance of E-Cadherin Protein Expression in Pathological Stage I-III Endometrial Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2004; 10(16): 5546 - 5553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. C. Park, R. L. Henshall-Powell, A. C. Erickson, R. Talhouk, B. Parvin, M. J. Bissell, and M. H. Barcellos-Hoff
Ionizing radiation induces heritable disruption of epithelial cell interactions
PNAS, September 16, 2003; 100(19): 10728 - 10733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Anders, R. Hansen, R.-X. Ding, K. A. Rauen, M. J. Bissell, and W. M. Korn
Disruption of 3D tissue integrity facilitates adenovirus infection by deregulating the coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor
PNAS, February 18, 2003; 100(4): 1943 - 1948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
A N J Graham, P Maxwell, K Mulholland, A H Patterson, N Anderson, K G McManus, H Bharucha, and J A McGuigan
Increased nm23 immunoreactivity is associated with selective inhibition of systemic tumour cell dissemination
J. Clin. Pathol., March 1, 2002; 55(3): 184 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. G. Corn, E. I. Heath, R. Heitmiller, F. Fogt, A. A. Forastiere, J. G. Herman, and T.-T. Wu
Frequent Hypermethylation of the 5' CpG Island of E-Cadherin in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2001; 7(9): 2765 - 2769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. Lundin, M. Lundin, K. Holli, V. Kataja, L. Elomaa, L. Pylkkanen, T. Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, and H. Joensuu
Omission of Histologic Grading From Clinical Decision Making May Result in Overuse of Adjuvant Therapies in Breast Cancer: Results From a Nationwide Study
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2001; 19(1): 28 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
F. Bertucci, R. Houlgatte, A. Benziane, S. Granjeaud, J. Adelaide, R. Tagett, B. Loriod, J. Jacquemier, P. Viens, B. Jordan, et al.
Gene expression profiling of primary breast carcinomas using arrays of candidate genes
Hum. Mol. Genet., December 1, 2000; 9(20): 2981 - 2991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2000 by the American Association for Cancer Research.