| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Clinical Investigations |
Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research [D. I. Q., S. M. H., D. R. H., R. L. S.], and Departments of Urology [D. G., J. D. W., P. C. B., P. D. S.], Anatomical Pathology [J. J. T.], and Medical Oncology [J. J. G.], St. Vincents Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales 2010; Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, North Ryde, New South Wales 2113 [W. D.]; and Sydney Diagnostic Services, North Ryde, New South Wales 2113 [J. F. F.], Australia
The role of p53 in the pathogenesis of, and as a predictive
biomarker for, localized prostate cancer (PCa) is contested. Recent
work has suggested that patterns of p53 nuclear accumulation determined
by immunohistochemistry are prognostic, whereas studies using other
methods question the role of p53 mutations in predicting
outcome. We studied 263 men with localized PCa treated with radical
prostatectomy to determine whether p53 nuclear accumulation predicts
relapse and disease-specific mortality. We combined two p53
immunohistochemistry scoring systems: (a) percentage of
p53-positive tumor nuclei in all major foci of cancer within the
prostate; and (b) clustering, where the presence of 12
or more p53-positive cells within a x200 power field was deemed
"cluster positive." Analysis was undertaken using
2,
Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney tests for clinicopathological
variables and the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and univariate
and multivariate Cox regression modeling for evaluation of contribution
to relapse and disease-specific survival. At mean follow-up of 55.1
months (range, 4.9123.0 months), 39% (102 of 263) of patients had
relapsed and 2.3% (6 of 253) had died of PCa. Pretreatment serum
prostate-specific antigen concentration, pathological tumor stage,
lymph node involvement, Gleason score, and p53 nuclear accumulation, as
determined by either percentage score or cluster status, were
independent predictors of relapse in multivariate analysis. Clustering
of p53-positive cells distinguished between favorable and poor
prognosis patients within the lowest p53-positive stratum (>0 to
<2%) and was the most discriminatory threshold for predicting relapse
in the entire cohort. p53 status predicted outcome in patients with a
Gleason score of 5 and above but not those with a score of 4 and below.
In patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, p53 cluster
positivity carried a 90% (19 of 21) risk of relapse by 36 months. All
six patients who died from PCa in the period of the study exhibited p53
nuclear accumulation in 20% or more tumor nuclei. This study
demonstrates strong relationships between p53 nuclear accumulation and
relapse and disease-specific mortality in a large series of localized
PCas. Furthermore, the presence of clusters of p53-positive nuclei
delineates a group of patients with poor prognosis not identified by
traditional scoring methods and supports the hypothesis that p53
dysfunction within PCa may exist in foci of tumor cells that are
clonally expanded in metastases.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L.-Y. Khor, K. Bae, R. Paulus, T. Al-Saleem, M. E. Hammond, D. J. Grignon, M. Che, V. Venkatesan, R. W. Byhardt, M. Rotman, et al. MDM2 and Ki-67 Predict for Distant Metastasis and Mortality in Men Treated With Radiotherapy and Androgen Deprivation for Prostate Cancer: RTOG 92-02 J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2009; 27(19): 3177 - 3184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Rasiah, J. G. Kench, M. Gardiner-Garden, A. V. Biankin, D. Golovsky, P. C. Brenner, R. Kooner, G. F. O'Neill, J. J. Turner, W. Delprado, et al. Aberrant neuropeptide y and macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 expression are early events in prostate cancer development and are associated with poor prognosis. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2006; 15(4): 711 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Xia, S. R. Kumar, R. Masood, S. Zhu, R. Reddy, V. Krasnoperov, D. I. Quinn, S. M. Henshall, R. L. Sutherland, J. K. Pinski, et al. EphB4 Expression and Biological Significance in Prostate Cancer Cancer Res., June 1, 2005; 65(11): 4623 - 4632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ray, M. Ho, J. Ma, R. K. Parkes, T. G. Mainprize, S. Ueda, J. McLaughlin, E. Bouffet, J. T. Rutka, and C. E. Hawkins A Clinicobiological Model Predicting Survival in Medulloblastoma Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2004; 10(22): 7613 - 7620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Foley, D. Hollywood, and M. Lawler Molecular pathology of prostate cancer: the key to identifying new biomarkers of disease Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2004; 11(3): 477 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Ren, L. Li, A. A. Goltsov, T. L. Timme, S. A. Tahir, J. Wang, L. Garza, A. C. Chinault, and T. C. Thompson mRTVP-1, a Novel p53 Target Gene with Proapoptotic Activities Mol. Cell. Biol., May 15, 2002; 22(10): 3345 - 3357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. F. Pollack, S. D. Finkelstein, J. Woods, J. Burnham, E. J. Holmes, R. L. Hamilton, A. J. Yates, J. M. Boyett, J. L. Finlay, R. Sposto, et al. Expression of p53 and Prognosis in Children with Malignant Gliomas N. Engl. J. Med., February 7, 2002; 346(6): 420 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. Horvath, S. M. Henshall, C-S. Lee, D. R. Head, D. I. Quinn, S. Makela, W. Delprado, D. Golovsky, P. C. Brenner, G. O'Neill, et al. Frequent Loss of Estrogen Receptor-{beta} Expression in Prostate Cancer Cancer Res., July 1, 2001; 61(14): 5331 - 5335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Henshall, D. I. Quinn, C. S. Lee, D. R. Head, D. Golovsky, P. C. Brenner, W. Delprado, P. D. Stricker, J. J. Grygiel, and R. L. Sutherland Altered Expression of Androgen Receptor in the Malignant Epithelium and Adjacent Stroma Is Associated with Early Relapse in Prostate Cancer Cancer Res., January 1, 2001; 61(2): 423 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Thornbury, D. K. Ornstein, P. L. Choyke, C. P. Langlotz, and J. C. Weinreb Prostate Cancer: What Is the Future Role for Imaging? Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2001; 176(1): 17 - 22. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |