Cancer Research Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coralli, C.
Right arrow Articles by Dachs, G. U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coralli, C.
Right arrow Articles by Dachs, G. U.
[Cancer Research 61, 4784-4790, June 15, 2001]
© 2001 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Biology and Genetics

Limitations of the Reporter Green Fluorescent Protein under Simulated Tumor Conditions1

Claudia Coralli, Maja Cemazar, Chryso Kanthou, Gillian M. Tozer and Gabi U. Dachs2

Tumour Microcirculation Group, Gray Laboratory Cancer Research Trust, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex HA6 2JR, United Kingdom

This paper reports a detailed analysis of the effect of low oxygen conditions (hypoxia) on the reporter green fluorescent protein (GFP). It questions the feasibility of using GFP for gene expression studies under tumor conditions. Hypoxia is a characteristic of both experimental and clinical tumors. Several important factors are pointed out which need to be considered when using GFP as reporter gene. GFP fluorescence is the final product of a long and complex pathway involving transcription, translation, and posttranslational modifications. All of these steps may be affected by the availability of oxygen. We show specifically that cellular GFP fluorescence decreased with reduced oxygenation, anoxia virtually eliminated fluorescence and protein levels, and fluorescence recovery after anoxia required 5–10 h of reoxygenation. In conclusion, GFP appears to be a good marker gene to study location or movement of proteins or cells but should be used with great caution as a reporter of gene expression under tumor conditions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
V. Raman, D. Artemov, A. P. Pathak, P. T. Winnard Jr., S. McNutt, A. Yudina, A. Bogdanov Jr., and Z. M. Bhujwalla
Characterizing Vascular Parameters in Hypoxic Regions: A Combined Magnetic Resonance and Optical Imaging Study of a Human Prostate Cancer Model.
Cancer Res., October 15, 2006; 66(20): 9929 - 9936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Q. Wu, K. Esuvaranathan, and R. Mahendran
Monitoring the Response of Orthotopic Bladder Tumors to Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Therapy Using the Prostate-Specific Antigen Gene as a Reporter
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2004; 10(20): 6977 - 6984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2001 by the American Association for Cancer Research.