Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention  AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freudenstein, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nißlein, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Freudenstein, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nißlein, T.
[Cancer Research 62, 3448-3452, June 15, 2002]
© 2002 American Association for Cancer Research


Experimental Therapeutics

Lack of Promotion of Estrogen-dependent Mammary Gland Tumors in vivo by an Isopropanolic Cimicifuga racemosa Extract

Johannes Freudenstein1, Clemens Dasenbrock and Thomas Nißlein

Schaper & Brümmer GmbH & Co. KG, D-38259 Salzgitter [J. F., T. N.] and Fraunhofer ITA, 30625 Hannover, Germany [C. D.]

Cimicifuga racemosa (CR) is widely used in the treatment of menopausal symptoms. Mechanistic studies suggest that unlike hormone-replacement therapy, CR does not stimulate estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer cells. To evaluate CR safety, we performed an in vivo investigation of a clinically tested isopropanolic CR extract. Mammary tumors were induced in Sprague Dawley rats (n = 75) by the application of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene. Five to nine weeks later, the animals were ovariectomized, allowed to recover, and administered daily doses of CR extract (0.714, 7.14, or 71.4 mg/kg body weight per day) or control substances (estrogen/positive control: 450 µg/kg/day mestranol; or CR vehicle/negative control). The animals were sacrificed 6 weeks later, and tumor number, size, plasma hormone levels, and the weight of estrogen-sensitive organs were analyzed. In contrast to mestranol treatment, CR treatment did not stimulate cancerous growth. There were no significant differences in tumor number or size between the CR groups and the vehicle control. Likewise, prolactin, follicle-stimulating hormone, and luteinizing hormone levels and organ weights and endometrial proliferation were unaffected. The lack of mammary tumor-stimulating effects of this extract is of great significance in establishing the safety of CR extracts for treatment of menopausal symptoms in women with a history of breast cancer in which hormone-replacement therapy is contraindicated.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
A. H. Boekhout, J. H. Beijnen, and J. H.M. Schellens
Symptoms and treatment in cancer therapy-induced early menopause.
Oncologist, June 1, 2006; 11(6): 641 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr Cancer TherHome page
C. E. Piersen
Phytoestrogens in Botanical Dietary Supplements: Implications for Cancer
Integr Cancer Ther, June 1, 2003; 2(2): 120 - 138.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2002 by the American Association for Cancer Research.