This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dragsted, L. O. Articles by Loft, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dragsted, L. O. Articles by Loft, S.

A Sucrose-rich Diet Induces Mutations in the Rat Colon

Institute of Food Safety and Nutrition, Division of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology, The Danish Veterinary and Food Administration, DK-2860 Søborg, Denmark [L. O. D., B. D., A. M. M., M. H.]; National Institute of Occupational Health, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark [U. V., H. W.]; Institute of Environmental Medicine, University of Aarhus, Universitetsparken, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark [H. N. A.]; Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark [L. R., P. M., S. L.]; and Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark [H. E. P.]

A sucrose-rich diet has repeatedly been observed to have cocarcinogenic actions in the colon and liver of rats and to increase the number of aberrant crypt foci in rat colon. To investigate whether sucrose-rich diets might directly increase the genotoxic response in the rat colon or liver, we have added sucrose to the diet of Big Blue rats, a strain of Fischer rats carrying 40 copies of the -phage on chromosome 4. Dietary sucrose was provided to the rats for 3 weeks at four dose levels including the background level in the purified diet [3.4% (control), 6.9%, 13.8%, or 34.5%] without affecting the overall energy and carbohydrate intake. We observed a dose-dependent increase in the mutation frequency at the cII site in the colonic mucosa with increased sucrose levels, reaching a 129% increase at the highest dose level. This would indicate a direct or indirect genotoxic effect of a sucrose-rich diet. No significant increase in mutations was observed in the liver. To seek an explanation for this finding, a variety of parameters were examined representing different mechanisms, including increased oxidative stress, changes in oxidative defense, effects on DNA repair, or changes in the background levels of DNA adducts. Sucrose did not increase the number of DNA strand breaks or oxidized bases assessed as endonuclease III-sensitive sites or 8-oxodeoxyguanosine in colon or liver. DNA repair capacity as determined by expression of the rERCC1 or rOGG1 genes was not increased in colon or liver, but the background level of DNA adducts (I-compounds) as determined by ³²P postlabeling was significantly decreased in colon. This decrease in colon I-compounds correlated inversely with both mutation frequency and ERCC1 DNA repair gene expression. Dietary sucrose did not change liver apoptosis or cell turnover as determined by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated biotinylated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling assay and proliferating cell nuclear antigen. An increase in liver ascorbate was also observed, whereas oxidative damage was not observed in proteins or lipids in liver cytosol or in blood plasma. We conclude that a sucrose-rich diet directly or indirectly increases the mutation frequency in rat colon in a dose-dependent manner and concomitantly decreases the level of background DNA adducts, without a direct effect on the expression of major DNA repair enzyme systems. We also conclude that an oxidative mechanism for this effect of sucrose is unlikely. This is the first demonstration of a genotoxic action of increased dietary sucrose in vivo. Both sucrose intake and colon cancer rates are high in the Western world, and our present results call for an examination of a possible direct relationship between the two.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. H. Pottenger, J. S. Bus, and B. B. Gollapudi Genetic Toxicity Assessment: Employing the Best Science for Human Safety Evaluation Part VI: When Salt and Sugar and Vegetables Are Positive, How Can Genotoxicity Data Serve to Inform Risk Assessment? Toxicol. Sci., August 1, 2007; 98(2): 327 - 331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Dybdahl, L. Risom, P. Moller, H. Autrup, H. Wallin, U. Vogel, J. Bornholdt, B. Daneshvar, L. O. Dragsted, A. Weimann, et al. DNA adduct formation and oxidative stress in colon and liver of Big Blue(R) rats after dietary exposure to diesel particles Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2003; 24(11): 1759 - 1766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. R. Bruce Counterpoint: From Animal Models to Prevention of Colon Cancer. Criteria for Proceeding from Preclinical Studies and Choice of Models for Prevention Studies Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2003; 12(5): 401 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]