Cancer Research SABCS  Protein Translation and Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Y.
[Cancer Research 62, 6031-6034, November 1, 2002]
© 2002 American Association for Cancer Research


Advances in Brief

Ku Affects the CHK1-dependent G2 Checkpoint after Ionizing Radiation1

Xiang Wang, Gloria C. Li, George Iliakis and Ya Wang2

Department of Radiation Oncology, Kimmel Cancer Center of Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 [X. W., Y. W.]; Departments of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021 [G. C. L.]; and Institute of Medical Radiation Biology, University of Essen Medical School, 45122 Essen, Germany [G. I.]

There are two major pathways for repairing DNA double strand breaks in mammalian cells: nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination repair (HRR). The nonhomologous end joining repair is deficient in cells without Ku, whereas HRR is highly efficient in such cells compared with their wild-type counterparts. The mechanism remains unclear. We reported previously that Ku80-/- cells show a stronger ATM-dependent S-phase checkpoint response than Ku80+/+ cells after ionizing radiation (IR; X-Y. Zhou et al., Oncogene, 21:6377–6381, 2002). We report in this study that Ku80-/- cells also show a much stronger G2 accumulation than Ku80+/+ cells after IR. The stronger G2 checkpoint response in Ku80-/- cells is ATM independent but is accompanied with a higher activity of CHK1 kinase. Treatment with Chk1 antisense oligonucleotide abolishes the stronger G2 checkpoint response and sensitizes Ku80-/- cells to IR. These data indicate that the stronger G2 checkpoint response shown in Ku80-/- cells is CHK1 dependent and suggest that the CHK1-dependent checkpoint response contributes to the highly efficient HRR in such cells.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
J.-H. Guervilly, G. Mace-Aime, and F. Rosselli
Loss of CHK1 function impedes DNA damage-induced FANCD2 monoubiquitination but normalizes the abnormal G2 arrest in Fanconi anemia
Hum. Mol. Genet., March 1, 2008; 17(5): 679 - 689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Tomimatsu, C. G. T. Tahimic, A. Otsuki, S. Burma, A. Fukuhara, K. Sato, G. Shiota, M. Oshimura, D. J. Chen, and A. Kurimasa
Ku70/80 Modulates ATM and ATR Signaling Pathways in Response to DNA Double Strand Breaks
J. Biol. Chem., April 6, 2007; 282(14): 10138 - 10145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
C. M. Sturgeon, Z. A. Knight, K. M. Shokat, and M. Roberge
Effect of combined DNA repair inhibition and G2 checkpoint inhibition on cell cycle progression after DNA damage.
Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2006; 5(4): 885 - 892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X. Wang, J. Khadpe, B. Hu, G. Iliakis, and Y. Wang
An Overactivated ATR/CHK1 Pathway Is Responsible for the Prolonged G2 Accumulation in Irradiated AT Cells
J. Biol. Chem., August 15, 2003; 278(33): 30869 - 30874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2002 by the American Association for Cancer Research.