| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |
Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4255 [L. J. S., R. L. D., M. C. P.]; Division of Biochemical Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079 [F. A. B., M. I. C., D. R. D.]; and Centro de Química Estrutural, Complexo I, Instituto Superior Técnico, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal [G. G. d. C., M. M. M.]
The use of the antiestrogen tamoxifen (TAM) is associated with an increase in endometrial cancer. TAM-induced endometrial carcinogenesis may proceed through a genotoxin-mediated pathway, although the detection of endometrial TAM-DNA adducts in exposed women is still controversial. In this study, a monkey model has been used to investigate the question of TAM-DNA adduct formation in primates. Two methods have been used to determine TAM-DNA adducts: a TAM-DNA chemiluminescence immunoassay (TAM-DNA CIA), using an antiserum that has specificity for (E)-
-(deoxyguanosin-N2-yl)-tamoxifen (dG-TAM) and (E)-
-(deoxyguanosin-N2-yl)-N-desmethyltamoxifen (dG-desmethyl-TAM) and electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ES-MS/MS) coupled with on-line sample preparation and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Mature (19 year old) cynomolgus monkeys were given either vehicle control (n = 1) or TAM (n = 3) twice daily for a total dose of 2 mg of TAM/kg body weight (bw)/day for 30 days by naso-gastric intubation. Tissues were harvested, and DNA was isolated from uterus, ovary, liver, brain cortex, and kidney. By TAM-DNA CIA, values for uterine TAM-DNA adducts in two monkeys were 0.9 and 1.7 adducts/108 nucleotides, whereas values for ovarian TAM-DNA adducts in the same animals were 0.4 and 0.5 adducts/108 nucleotides. Liver, brain cortex, and kidney DNA samples from the three exposed monkeys had TAM-DNA levels of 2.14.2 adducts/108 nucleotides, 0.45.0 adducts/108 nucleotides, and 0.72.1 adducts/108 nucleotides, respectively. By HPLC-ES-MS/MS, the levels of TAM-DNA adducts detected in all tissues were comparable with those observed by TAM-DNA CIA. Thus, values for uterine TAM-DNA adducts ranged from 0.5 to 1.4 adducts/108 nucleotides, whereas values for ovarian TAM-DNA adducts, measurable in two monkeys, were 0.2 and 0.3 adducts/108 nucleotides. Liver DNA contained the highest TAM-DNA adduct levels (7.011.1 adducts/108 nucleotides), whereas brain cortex DNA contained lower adduct levels (0.64.8 adducts/108 nucleotides) and the lowest levels were measured in the kidney (0.20.4 adducts/108 nucleotides). This study indicates that cynomolgus monkeys are capable of metabolizing TAM to genotoxic intermediates that form TAM-DNA adducts in multiple tissues.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Brown, E. M. Tompkins, D. J. Boocock, E. A. Martin, P. B. Farmer, K. W. Turteltaub, E. Ubick, D. Hemingway, E. Horner-Glister, and I. N.H. White Tamoxifen Forms DNA Adducts in Human Colon after Administration of a Single [14C]-Labeled Therapeutic Dose Cancer Res., July 15, 2007; 67(14): 6995 - 7002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Y. Kim, N. Suzuki, Y. R. S. Laxmi, and S. Shibutani INEFFICIENT REPAIR OF TAMOXIFEN-DNA ADDUCTS IN RATS AND MICE Drug Metab. Dispos., February 1, 2006; 34(2): 311 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Singh and P. B. Farmer Liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry: the future of DNA adduct detection Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2006; 27(2): 178 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Y. Kim, Y. R. S. Laxmi, N. Suzuki, K. Ogura, T. Watabe, M. W. Duffel, and S. Shibutani FORMATION OF TAMOXIFEN-DNA ADDUCTS VIA O-SULFONATION, NOT O-ACETYLATION, OF {alpha}-HYDROXYTAMOXIFEN IN RAT AND HUMAN LIVERS Drug Metab. Dispos., November 1, 2005; 33(11): 1673 - 1678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Phillips, A. Hewer, M. R. Osborne, K. J. Cole, C. Churchill, and V. M. Arlt Organ specificity of DNA adduct formation by tamoxifen and {alpha}-hydroxytamoxifen in the rat: implications for understanding the mechanism(s) of tamoxifen carcinogenicity and for human risk assessment Mutagenesis, July 1, 2005; 20(4): 297 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Schild, D. H. Phillips, M. R. Osborne, A. Hewer, F. A. Beland, M. I. Churchwell, K. Brown, M. Gaskell, E. Wright, and M. C. Poirier Hepatic DNA adduct dosimetry in rats fed tamoxifen: a comparison of methods Mutagenesis, March 1, 2005; 20(2): 115 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. Beland, M. I. Churchwell, D. R. Doerge, D. R. Parkin, D. Malejka-Giganti, A. Hewer, D. H. Phillips, P. L. Carmichael, G. Gamboa da Costa, and M. M. Marques Electrospray Ionization-Tandem Mass Spectrometry and 32P-Postlabeling Analyses of Tamoxifen-DNA Adducts in Humans J Natl Cancer Inst, July 21, 2004; 96(14): 1099 - 1104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |