This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gatenby, R. A. Articles by Vincent, T. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gatenby, R. A. Articles by Vincent, T. L.

An Evolutionary Model Of Carcinogenesis

Departments of Radiology [R. A. G.], Applied Mathematics, and Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering [T. L. V.], University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85724

A quantitative model of carcinogenesis based on methods from population biology and game theory demonstrates normal cells in vivo occupy a ridge-shaped maximum in a well-defined tissue fitness landscape, a novel configuration that allows cooperative coexistence of multiple cellular populations. This state, although necessary for development of functioning multicellular organisms, is subject to invasion by fitter, mutant phenotypes permitting somatic evolution of cancer. The model demonstrates carcinogenesis is an emergent phenomenon requiring a sequence of evolutionary steps as cellular proliferation follows successful adaptation to varying environmental constraints. In the initial development of preneoplastic lesions, cellular proliferation is controlled exclusively by interactions with other cells, the extracellular matrix, and soluble or insoluble growth factors so that gain of function mutations in oncogenes, loss of function mutations in tumor suppressor genes, and disruption of normal senescence pathways will permit clonal expansion. This provides explicit selection mechanisms for the mutations depicted in the classical Fearon-Vogelstein model of colorectal carcinogenesis. The model demonstrates neoplastic cellular proliferation can also be promoted by alterations in the somatic landscape that reduce inhibitory signals produced by the normal cells and extracellular matrix. This is consistent with experimental evidence for a strong microenvironmental influence in tumorigenesis independent of genomic changes in the neoplastic populations. However, we find that these changes alone produce only self-limited neoplastic growth because cellular crowding alters system dynamics so that proliferation is dependent on substrate availability. Consequent cellular competition for critical nutrients results in Darwinian selection pressures favoring phenotypes that increase substrate delivery (e.g., angiogenesis) or uptake (e.g., amplify membrane transporters). These previously unknown substrate dynamics in the later stages of carcinogenesis provide a mechanism for evolution of cellular properties typically found in invasive cancers including the angiogenic and glycolytic phenotypes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. A. van Hoek and P. Hogeweg Metabolic Adaptation after Whole Genome Duplication Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2009; 26(11): 2441 - 2453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Zhao and R. J. Epstein Programmed Genetic Instability: A Tumor-Permissive Mechanism for Maintaining the Evolvability of Higher Species through Methylation-Dependent Mutation of DNA Repair Genes in the Male Germ Line Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2008; 25(8): 1737 - 1749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. V. Iakovlev, N. C.R. Arneson, V. Wong, C. Wang, S. Leung, G. Iakovleva, K. Warren, M. Pintilie, and S. J. Done Genomic Differences Between Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast and that Associated with Invasive Disease: a Calibrated aCGH Study Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 14(14): 4446 - 4454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Gillies, I. Robey, and R. A. Gatenby Causes and Consequences of Increased Glucose Metabolism of Cancers J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(Suppl_2): 24S - 42S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Vineis and M. Berwick The population dynamics of cancer: a Darwinian perspective Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2006; 35(5): 1151 - 1159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A Gatenby Commentary: Carcinogenesis as Darwinian evolution? Do the math! Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2006; 35(5): 1165 - 1167. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Axelrod, D. E. Axelrod, and K. J. Pienta From the Cover: Evolution of cooperation among tumor cells PNAS, September 5, 2006; 103(36): 13474 - 13479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Maaser, P. Grabowski, Y. Oezdem, A. Krahn, B. Heine, H. Stein, H. Buhr, M. Zeitz, and H. Scherubl Up-Regulation of the Peripheral Benzodiazepine Receptor during Human Colorectal Carcinogenesis and Tumor Spread Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 11(5): 1751 - 1756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Stringer, J. S. Larson, J. M. Fischer, M. Medvedovic, M. N. Hersh, G. P. Boivin, and S. L. Stringer Modeling variation in tumors in vivo PNAS, February 15, 2005; 102(7): 2408 - 2413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. C. Maley, B. J. Reid, and S. Forrest Cancer Prevention Strategies That Address the Evolutionary Dynamics of Neoplastic Cells: Simulating Benign Cell Boosters and Selection for Chemosensitivity Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2004; 13(8): 1375 - 1384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Bagatell and L. Whitesell Altered Hsp90 function in cancer: A unique therapeutic opportunity Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2004; 3(8): 1021 - 1030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Huycke and H. R. Gaskins Commensal Bacteria, Redox Stress, and Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms and Models Experimental Biology and Medicine, July 1, 2004; 229(7): 586 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Hamoui, J. H. Peters, S. Schneider, K. Uchida, D. Yang, D. Valboehmer, J. A. Hagen, S. R. DeMeester, T. R. DeMeester, K. Danenberg, et al. Increased Acid Exposure in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Influences Cyclooxygenase-2 Gene Expression in the Squamous Epithelium of the Lower Esophagus Arch Surg, July 1, 2004; 139(7): 712 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]