This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Risques, R.-A. Articles by Peinado, M. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Risques, R.-A. Articles by Peinado, M. A.

Genetic Pathways and Genome-Wide Determinants of Clinical Outcome in Colorectal Cancer¹

Institut de Recerca Oncològica [R-A. R., M. R., M. A. P.] and Institut Català d’Oncologia [V. M., G. C.], Hospital Duran i Reynals, 08907 Barcelona, and Servei d’Oncologia, Hospital de Sant Pau, 08025 Barcelona [E. M.], Spain

Various studies have suggested the existence of different pathways of tumor progression in colorectal cancer that associate with specific molecular, chromosomal, and clinicopathological features. We hypothesize that a comprehensive analysis of cumulated genomic damage in colorectal cancers would aid the characterization of different tumor progression pathways and identify the factors determining clinical outcome of tumors of each type. Genome-wide disruption was studied by DNA fingerprinting in a series of 129 sporadic colorectal carcinomas. These results, taken together with data for DNA ploidy, microsatellite instability, p53, and K-ras mutations and clinicopathological characteristics of the patients, have been used to classify colorectal carcinomas. The following five groups can be defined based on the type and level of cumulated genomic damage: (a) tumors with microsatellite instability, right location, and good prognosis; (b) diploid tumors lacking p53 mutations, left and right location, low subchromosomal damage, and bad prognosis; (c) diploid tumors with p53 mutations, left location, high levels of subchromosomal damage, and good prognosis; (d) high aneuploid tumors, p53 mutations, left location, high levels of numerical and structural chromosomal alterations, and bad prognosis; and finally (e) low aneuploid tumors, no p53 mutations, left and right location, low levels of structural chromosomal alterations, and good prognosis. We postulate that these groups represent alternative pathways of tumor progression, each with determinants of aggressiveness. This indicates a need for different prognostic assessments depending on which group the tumor belongs to.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. A. Boardman, R. A. Johnson, G. M. Petersen, A. L. Oberg, B. F. Kabat, J. P. Slusser, L. Wang, B. W. Morlan, A. J. French, T. C. Smyrk, et al. Higher Frequency of Diploidy in Young-Onset Microsatellite-Stable Colorectal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2007; 13(8): 2323 - 2328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Rodriguez, J. Frigola, E. Vendrell, R.-A. Risques, M. F. Fraga, C. Morales, V. Moreno, M. Esteller, G. Capella, M. Ribas, et al. Chromosomal Instability Correlates with Genome-wide DNA Demethylation in Human Primary Colorectal Cancers. Cancer Res., September 1, 2006; 66(17): 8462 - 9468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Masramon, E. Vendrell, G. Tarafa, G. Capella, R. Miro, M. Ribas, and M. A. Peinado Genetic instability and divergence of clonal populations in colon cancer cells in vitro J. Cell Sci., April 15, 2006; 119(8): 1477 - 1482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Russo, V. Bazan, B. Iacopetta, D. Kerr, T. Soussi, N. Gebbia, and for the TP53-CRC Collaborative Study Group The TP53 Colorectal Cancer International Collaborative Study on the Prognostic and Predictive Significance of p53 Mutation: Influence of Tumor Site, Type of Mutation, and Adjuvant Treatment J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2005; 23(30): 7518 - 7528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A B Hassan and C Paraskeva Colorectal cancer prognosis: is it all mutation, mutation, mutation? Gut, September 1, 2005; 54(9): 1209 - 1211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Shibata, S. Uryu, A. Kokubu, F. Hosoda, M. Ohki, T. Sakiyama, Y. Matsuno, R. Tsuchiya, Y. Kanai, T. Kondo, et al. Genetic Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma Based on Array-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization Analysis: Its Association with Clinicopathologic Features Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2005; 11(17): 6177 - 6185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. R. Mehta, K. Nakao, M. B. Zuraek, D. T. Ruan, E. K. Bergsland, A. P. Venook, D. H. Moore, T. A. Tokuyasu, A. N. Jain, R. S. Warren, et al. Fractional Genomic Alteration Detected by Array-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization Independently Predicts Survival after Hepatic Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 11(5): 1791 - 1797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]