This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bellnier, D. A. Articles by Cheney, R. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bellnier, D. A. Articles by Cheney, R. T.

Treatment with the Tumor Necrosis Factor--Inducing Drug 5,6-Dimethylxanthenone-4-Acetic Acid Enhances the Antitumor Activity of the Photodynamic Therapy of RIF-1 Mouse Tumors

¹ The Photodynamic Therapy Center,
² Department of Biostatistics,
³ Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York

DMXAA (5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid) is an antivascular agent that exerts its antitumor effect at least partly through the induction of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-. Photodynamic therapy (PDT), the activation of a photoreactive drug in tumor tissue with visible light, is used clinically to control solid malignancies. PDT has been shown previously to be potentiated, in mice, by the i.p. administration of recombinant human TNF-. Here, we investigated the activity of DMXAA as a modifier of Photofrin-based PDT of implanted murine RIF-1 tumors. The DMXAA dose (20 mg·kg^-1) used throughout this study had little effect on tumor growth. The combination of DMXAA and PDT led to a reduction in tumor volume and significant delays in regrowth, giving a PDT-dose modification factor of 2.81. This enhancement was found to be strongly schedule dependent. The most pronounced responses were achieved when DMXAA was administered 1–3 h before the local illumination of the tumors; less activity was observed at other intervals within ±24 h of PDT-light delivery. Using a 2-h DMXAA-light interval, histological examination showed significantly reduced blood vessel counts (CD31 immunostaining) and marked necrosis (H&E) in the tumors given combination therapy compared with the tumors given either agent alone. Conversely, peritumoral tissue was still intact 24 h after the combined therapy. DMXAA did not augment the damage to normal mouse feet after low-dose PDT (1.5 mg·kg^-1 Photofrin); however, there was some enhancement of normal tissue phototoxicity when DMXAA was combined with high-dose PDT. The antitumor effect after DMXAA plus low-dose PDT (1.5 mg·kg^-1 Photofrin) appeared to be dependent on TNF- because neutralizing antibodies to this cytokine reduced the tumor response to control levels. DMXAA by itself induced TNF- in RIF-1 tumors whereas PDT did not. However, the addition of PDT after DMXAA resulted in decreases in TNF-, suggesting that the enhanced antitumor activity of the combination therapy was not attributable simply to an increased induction of the cytokine by PDT over that from DMXAA alone. These observations suggest a promising new combination therapy with considerable therapeutic advantage.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Seshadri, J. A. Spernyak, R. Mazurchuk, S. H. Camacho, A. R. Oseroff, R. T. Cheney, and D. A. Bellnier Tumor Vascular Response to Photodynamic Therapy and the Antivascular Agent 5,6-Dimethylxanthenone-4-Acetic Acid: Implications for Combination Therapy Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2005; 11(11): 4241 - 4250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]