Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2010  EMT and Cancer Progression and Treatment
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bellnier, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dougherty, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bellnier, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dougherty, T. J.
[Cancer Research 63, 1806-1813, April 15, 2003]
© 2003 American Association for Cancer Research


Clinical Investigations

Population Pharmacokinetics of the Photodynamic Therapy Agent 2-[1-Hexyloxyethyl]-2-devinyl Pyropheophorbide-a in Cancer Patients1

David A. Bellnier2,,3, William R. Greco2, Gregory M. Loewen, Hector Nava, Allan R. Oseroff, Ravindra K. Pandey, Takaaki Tsuchida and Thomas J. Dougherty

PDT Center [D. A. B., R. K. P., T. J. D.] and Departments of Cancer Prevention [W. R. G.], Medicine [G. M. L.], Surgery [H. N.], and Dermatology [A. R. O.], Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York 14263 and Department of Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan [T. T.]

Photodynamic therapy is an effective and often curative treatment for certain solid tumors. The porphyrin-based photosensitizer Photofrin, the only Food and Drug Administration-approved drug for this therapy, suffers from certain disadvantages: its complex chemical nature; retention by skin (leading to protracted cutaneous photosensitivity); and less than optimal photophysical properties. In this study, we examine the population pharmacokinetics and cutaneous phototoxicity of 2-[1-hexyloxyethyl]-2-devinyl pyropheophorbide-a (HPPH), a chlorin-type photosensitizer with more favorable photophysical properties. HPPH plasma concentration-time data were obtained in 25 patients enrolled in Phase I-II clinical trials for the treatment of partially obstructive esophageal carcinoma, high-grade dysplasia associated with Barrett’s esophagus, carcinoma of the lung, or multiple basal cell carcinomas. Doses of 3, 4, 5, or 6 mg/m2 were administered as 1-h i.v. infusions. The pharmacokinetic data for each patient were fitted with a standard two-compartment (biexponential) model with continuous infusion. The model fitting approach was iteratively reweighted nonlinear regression, with weights equal to the reciprocal of the square of the predicted HPPH plasma concentrations. The complete set of data for all 25 patients was then fitted simultaneously with nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Cutaneous phototoxicity responses were determined, as a function of time after HPPH infusion, following exposure to various doses of light from a solar simulator. The estimates of the population mean (variance) for each parameter were as follows: volume of distribution (VC), 2.40 liters/m2 (0.259); steady-state volume (VSS), 9.58 liters/m2 (11.6); systemic clearance (CL), 0.0296 liter/h/m2 (0.000094); and distributional clearance (CLD), 0.144 liter/h/m2 (0.00166). These parameters were independent of dose. Clearance increased with age. A relative error model was used for the difference in the raw and fitted data, and the overall coefficient of variation estimate across all of the data was 14.5%. The estimated mean population {alpha} and ß half-lives (95% confidence interval) were 7.77 h (3.46–17.6 h) and 596 h (120–2951 h), respectively. High-performance liquid chromatography analysis of serum showed no circulating HPPH metabolites, and in vitro incubation of HPPH with human liver microsomal preparations resulted in no metabolite or glucuronic acid-HPPH conjugate production. A minimal skin response to the solar simulator was observed, mostly in patients treated with the highest dose of HPPH, 6 mg/m2. All of the HPPH pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent with a highly lipophilic agent that is concentrated in plasma and is nearly 100% bound to plasma proteins; this was verified by plasma protein binding studies. Whereas low concentrations of HPPH can be detected in plasma several months after a single infusion, no instances of cutaneous photosensitivity have been noted in these patients. In general, HPPH pharmacokinetic profiles are readily predictable from the global population model. This is the first comprehensive human population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study of a clinical anticancer photodynamic therapy agent.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. D. Savellano, B. W. Pogue, P. J. Hoopes, E. S. Vitetta, and K. D. Paulsen
Multiepitope HER2 Targeting Enhances Photoimmunotherapy of HER2-Overexpressing Cancer Cells with Pyropheophorbide-a Immunoconjugates
Cancer Res., July 15, 2005; 65(14): 6371 - 6379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2003 by the American Association for Cancer Research.