| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |
in Translesion Synthesis Past PlatinumDNA Adducts in Human Fibroblasts
1 Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3 Curriculum in Toxicology, 4 Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, and 5 Center for Environmental Health and Susceptibility, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and 6 Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
Cisplatin, a widely used chemotherapeutic agent, has been implicated in the induction of secondary tumors in cancer patients. This drug is presumed to be mutagenic because of error-prone translesion synthesis of cisplatin adducts in DNA. Oxaliplatin is effective in cisplatin-resistant tumors, but its mutagenicity in humans has not been reported. The polymerases involved in bypass of cisplatin and oxaliplatin adducts in vivo are not known. DNA polymerase
is the most efficient polymerase for bypassing platinum adducts in vitro. We evaluated the role of polymerase
in translesion synthesis past platinum adducts by determining cytotoxicity and induced mutation frequencies at the hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) locus in diploid human fibroblasts. Normal human fibroblasts (NHF1) were compared with xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XPV) cells (polymerase
-null) after treatment with cisplatin. In addition, XPV cells complemented for polymerase
expression were compared with the isogenic cells carrying the empty expression vector. Cytotoxicity and induced mutagenicity experiments were measured in parallel in UVC-irradiated fibroblasts. We found that equitoxic doses of cisplatin induced mutations in fibroblasts lacking polymerase
at frequencies 2- to 2.5-fold higher than in fibroblasts with either normal or high levels of polymerase
. These results indicate that polymerase
is involved in error-free translesion synthesis past some cisplatin adducts. We also found that per lethal event, cisplatin was less mutagenic than UVC. Treatment with a wide range of cytotoxic doses of oxaliplatin did not induce mutations above background levels in cells either expressing or lacking polymerase
, suggesting that oxaliplatin is nonmutagenic in human fibroblasts.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. A. Brown, S. A. Newmister, K. A. Fiala, and Z. Suo Mechanism of double-base lesion bypass catalyzed by a Y-family DNA polymerase Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2008; 36(12): 3867 - 3878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Yang and R. Woodgate What a difference a decade makes: Insights into translesion DNA synthesis PNAS, October 2, 2007; 104(40): 15591 - 15598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Unsal-Kacmaz, P. D. Chastain, P.-P. Qu, P. Minoo, M. Cordeiro-Stone, A. Sancar, and W. K. Kaufmann The Human Tim/Tipin Complex Coordinates an Intra-S Checkpoint Response to UV That Slows Replication Fork Displacement Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2007; 27(8): 3131 - 3142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-w. Chen, J. E. Cleaver, F. Hanaoka, C.-f. Chang, and K.-m. Chou A Novel Role of DNA Polymerase {eta} in Modulating Cellular Sensitivity to Chemotherapeutic Agents Mol. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 4(4): 257 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. R. Salsbury Jr, J. E. Clodfelter, M. B. Gentry, T. Hollis, and K. D. Scarpinato The molecular mechanism of DNA damage recognition by MutS homologs and its consequences for cell death response. Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2006; 34(8): 2173 - 2185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Albertella, C. M. Green, A. R. Lehmann, and M. J. O'Connor A Role for Polymerase {eta} in the Cellular Tolerance to Cisplatin-Induced Damage Cancer Res., November 1, 2005; 65(21): 9799 - 9806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Clodfelter, M. B. Gentry, and K. Drotschmann MSH2 missense mutations alter cisplatin cytotoxicity and promote cisplatin-induced genome instability Nucleic Acids Res., June 9, 2005; 33(10): 3323 - 3330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |