| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |
Departments of 1 Pharmacology and 2 Biochemistry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
The ability to inappropriately progress through S phase during drug treatment is a key determinant of tumor cell sensitivity to thymidylate synthase inhibitors such as 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FdUrd). Previous studies suggest that SW620 cells, which are relatively resistant to FdUrd, have an intact early S-phase checkpoint that protects against FdUrd-induced DNA damage and cytotoxicity and that this checkpoint is defective in the relatively sensitive HT29 cells, which continue to progress through S phase during drug treatment. To test this hypothesis, we examined the expression and activation of known S-phase checkpoint mediators in FdUrd-treated SW620 and HT29 cells. FdUrd induced degradation of cdc25A in SW620, but not HT29 cells, in a manner that correlated with the previously described drug-induced S-phase arrest. This difference, however, could not be attributed to differences in either chk1 activation, which was similar in both cell lines, or chk2 activation, which only occurred in HT29 cells and correlated with uracil misincorporation/misrepair-induced DNA double-stranded breaks. These observations suggest that although FdUrd-induced S-phase arrest and associated cdc25A degradation are impaired in HT29 cells, signaling by ATM/ATR is intact upstream of chk1 and chk2. Finally, FdUrd induced premature mitotic entry, a phenomenon associated with deregulated cdc25A expression, in HT29 but not SW620 cells. Blocking cdc25A expression in HT29 cells with small interfering RNA attenuated FdUrd-induced premature mitotic entry, suggesting that progression of HT29 cells through S phase during drug treatment results in part from the inability of these cells to degrade cdc25A in response to FdUrd-induced DNA damage.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. A. Parsels, M. A. Morgan, D. M. Tanska, J. D. Parsels, B. D. Palmer, R. J. Booth, W. A. Denny, C. E. Canman, A. J. Kraker, T. S. Lawrence, et al. Gemcitabine sensitization by checkpoint kinase 1 inhibition correlates with inhibition of a Rad51 DNA damage response in pancreatic cancer cells Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2009; 8(1): 45 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Xiao, J. Xue, T. J. Sowin, and H. Zhang Differential roles of checkpoint kinase 1, checkpoint kinase 2, and mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinase 2 in mediating DNA damage-induced cell cycle arrest: implications for cancer therapy. Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2006; 5(8): 1935 - 1943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. D. Mayer, T. O. Harasym, P. G. Tardi, N. L. Harasym, C. R. Shew, S. A. Johnstone, E. C. Ramsay, M. B. Bally, and A. S. Janoff Ratiometric dosing of anticancer drug combinations: Controlling drug ratios after systemic administration regulates therapeutic activity in tumor-bearing mice. Mol. Cancer Ther., July 1, 2006; 5(7): 1854 - 1863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |