This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Maley, C. C. Articles by Reid, B. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Maley, C. C. Articles by Reid, B. J.

The Combination of Genetic Instability and Clonal Expansion Predicts Progression to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

¹ Divisions of Human Biology and Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; and Departments of ² Medicine and ³ Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

There is debate in the literature over the relative importance of genetic instability and clonal expansion during progression to cancer. Barrett’s esophagus is a uniquely suited model to investigate neoplastic progression prospectively because periodic endoscopic biopsy surveillance is recommended for early detection of esophageal adenocarcinoma. We hypothesized that expansion of clones with genetic instability would predict progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma. We measured p16 (CDKN2A/INK4A) lesions (loss of heterozygosity, mutations, and CpG island methylation), p53 (TP53) lesions (loss of heterozygosity, mutation) and ploidy abnormalities (aneuploidy, tetraploidy) within each Barrett’s esophagus segment of a cohort of 267 research participants, who were followed prospectively with cancer as an outcome. We defined the size of a lesion as the fraction of cells with the lesion multiplied by the length of the Barrett’s esophagus segment. A Cox proportional hazards regression indicates that the sizes of clones with p53 loss of heterozygosity (relative risk = 1.27^x for an x cm clone; 95% confidence interval, 1.07–1.50) or ploidy abnormalities (relative risk = 1.31^x for an x cm clone; 95% confidence interval, 1.07–1.60) predict progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma better than the mere presence of such clones (likelihood ratio test, P < 0.01). Controlling for length of the Barrett’s esophagus segment had little effect. The size of a clone with a p16 lesion is not a significant predictor of esophageal adenocarcinoma when we controlled for p53 loss of heterozygosity status. The combination of clonal expansion and genetic instability is a better predictor of cancer outcome than either alone. This implies that interventions that limit expansion of genetically unstable clones may reduce risk of progression to cancer.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Rhiner and E. Moreno Super competition as a possible mechanism to pioneer precancerous fields Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2009; 30(5): 723 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Li, P. C. Galipeau, C. A. Sanchez, P. L. Blount, C. C. Maley, J. Arnaudo, D. A. Peiffer, D. Pokholok, K. L. Gunderson, and B. J. Reid Single Nucleotide Polymorphism-Based Genome-Wide Chromosome Copy Change, Loss of Heterozygosity, and Aneuploidy in Barrett's Esophagus Neoplastic Progression Cancer Prevention Research, November 1, 2008; 1(6): 413 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. Reid Cancer Risk Assessment and Cancer Prevention: Promises and Challenges Cancer Prevention Research, September 1, 2008; 1(4): 229 - 232. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C Fitzgerald Dissecting out the genetic origins of Barrett's oesophagus Gut, August 1, 2008; 57(8): 1033 - 1034. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Yousef, C. Cardwell, M. M. Cantwell, K. Galway, B. T. Johnston, and L. Murray The Incidence of Esophageal Cancer and High-Grade Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Am. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2008; 168(3): 237 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Frumkin, A. Wasserstrom, S. Itzkovitz, T. Stern, A. Harmelin, R. Eilam, G. Rechavi, and E. Shapiro Cell Lineage Analysis of a Mouse Tumor Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 68(14): 5924 - 5931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Zagorowicz and J. Jankowski Molecular changes in the progression of Barrett's oesophagus Postgrad. Med. J., August 1, 2007; 83(982): 529 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Lippman and J. V. Heymach The Convergent Development of Molecular-Targeted Drugs for Cancer Treatment and Prevention Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2007; 13(14): 4035 - 4041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Dvorak, C. M Payne, M. Chavarria, L. Ramsey, B. Dvorakova, H. Bernstein, H. Holubec, R. E Sampliner, N. Guy, A. Condon, et al. Bile acids in combination with low pH induce oxidative stress and oxidative DNA damage: relevance to the pathogenesis of Barrett's oesophagus Gut, June 1, 2007; 56(6): 763 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Fitzgerald Molecular Tools for Predicting the Behavior of Barrett's Esophagus Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. Educ. Book, April 14, 2007; 2007(1): 133 - 138. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Izzo, T.-T. Wu, X. Wu, J. Ensor, R. Luthra, J. Pan, A. Correa, S. G. Swisher, C. K.S. Chao, W. N. Hittelman, et al. Cyclin D1 Guanine/Adenine 870 Polymorphism With Altered Protein Expression Is Associated With Genomic Instability and Aggressive Clinical Biology of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2007; 25(6): 698 - 707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R C Fitzgerald Molecular basis of Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Gut, December 1, 2006; 55(12): 1810 - 1820. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Zhang, C. R. Pickering, C. R. Holst, M. L. Gauthier, and T. D. Tlsty p16INK4a Modulates p53 in Primary Human Mammary Epithelial Cells Cancer Res., November 1, 2006; 66(21): 10325 - 10331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L Murray, A Sedo, M Scott, D McManus, J M Sloan, L J Hardie, D Forman, and C P Wild TP53 and progression from Barrett's metaplasia to oesophageal adenocarcinoma in a UK population cohort Gut, October 1, 2006; 55(10): 1390 - 1397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Lippman and J. J. Lee Reducing the "Risk" of Chemoprevention: Defining and Targeting High Risk--2005 AACR Cancer Research and Prevention Foundation Award Lecture. Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 66(6): 2893 - 2903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. J. Wongsurawat, J. C. Finley, P. C. Galipeau, C. A. Sanchez, C. C. Maley, X. Li, P. L. Blount, R. D. Odze, P. S. Rabinovitch, and B. J. Reid Genetic Mechanisms of TP53 Loss of Heterozygosity in Barrett's Esophagus: Implications for Biomarker Validation. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2006; 15(3): 509 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Lao-Sirieix, A. Roy, C. Worrall, S. L. Vowler, S. Gardiner, and R. C. Fitzgerald Effect of Acid suppression on molecular predictors for esophageal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2006; 15(2): 288 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]