This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smolen, G. A. Articles by Haber, D. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smolen, G. A. Articles by Haber, D. A.

SUMO-1 Modification of the Wilms’ Tumor Suppressor WT1

¹ Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts; and ² Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bloomberg School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

SUMO-1 conjugation modulates numerous cellular functions, including the subnuclear localization of its target proteins. The WT1 tumor suppressor encodes a four-zinc finger protein with distinct splicing isoforms. WT1(–KTS), encoding uninterrupted zinc fingers, functions as a transcription factor and has a diffusely nuclear distribution; WT1(+KTS), with an insertion of three amino acids (KTS) between zinc fingers three and four, localizes to discrete nuclear speckles, the function of which is unknown. Because the SUMO-1 E2-conjugating enzyme, Ubc9, interacts with WT1, we tested whether sumoylation modulates the cellular localization of WT1. We find here that both WT1 isoforms are directly sumoylated on lysine residues 73 and 177. Although RNA interference-mediated Ubc9 depletion effectively suppresses WT1 nuclear speckles, a SUMO-1–deficient WT1(+KTS)(K73, 177R) double mutant retains localization to speckles. Thus, direct sumoylation of WT1 is not responsible for its cellular localization, and other sumoylated proteins may target WT1 to these nuclear structures. Identification of other components of WT1-associated speckles is likely to provide clues to their function.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. A. Fryrear, S. S. Durkin, S. K. Gupta, J. B. Tiedebohl, and O. J. Semmes Dimerization and a Novel Tax Speckled Structure Localization Signal Are Required for Tax Nuclear Localization J. Virol., June 1, 2009; 83(11): 5339 - 5352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Green, K. J. Wagner, H. A. Campbell, K. Addison, and S. G. E. Roberts Dynamic interaction between WT1 and BASP1 in transcriptional regulation during differentiation Nucleic Acids Res., February 1, 2009; 37(2): 431 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Meednu, H. Hoops, S. D'Silva, L. Pogorzala, S. Wood, D. Farkas, M. Sorrentino, E. Sia, P. Meluh, and R. K. Miller The Spindle Positioning Protein Kar9p Interacts With the Sumoylation Machinery in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, December 1, 2008; 180(4): 2033 - 2055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Jakobs, F. Himstedt, M. Funk, B. Korn, M. Gaestel, and R. Niedenthal Ubc9 fusion-directed SUMOylation identifies constitutive and inducible SUMOylation Nucleic Acids Res., September 27, 2007; 35(17): e109 - e109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Mukhopadhyay, F. Ayaydin, N. Kolli, S.-H. Tan, T. Anan, A. Kametaka, Y. Azuma, K. D. Wilkinson, and M. Dasso SUSP1 antagonizes formation of highly SUMO2/3-conjugated species J. Cell Biol., September 25, 2006; 174(7): 939 - 949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]