| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Biology, Pathobiology and Genetics |
1 Department of Oncology, University Hospital; 2 Lund Strategic Research Center for Stem Cell Biology and Cell Therapy and 3 Department of Theoretical Physics, Lund University; and 4 Department of Pathology, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; 5 Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and 6 Section of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom
Requests for reprints: Åke Borg, Department of Oncology, Lund University, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden, SE 22185. Phone: 46-46-177502; Fax: 46-46-147327; E-mail: ake.borg{at}onk.lu.se.
Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for a significant proportion of hereditary breast cancers. Earlier studies have shown that inherited and sporadic tumors progress along different somatic genetic pathways and that global gene expression profiles distinguish between these groups. To determine whether genomic profiles similarly discriminate among BRCA1, BRCA2, and sporadic tumors, we established DNA copy number profiles using comparative genomic hybridization to BAC-clone microarrays providing <1 Mb resolution. Tumor DNA was obtained from BRCA1 (n = 14) and BRCA2 (n = 12) mutation carriers, as well as sporadic cases (n = 26). Overall, BRCA1 tumors had a higher frequency of copy number alterations than sporadic breast cancers (P = 0.00078). In particular, frequent losses on 4p, 4q, and 5q in BRCA1 tumors and frequent gains on 7p and 17q24 in BRCA2 tumors distinguish these from sporadic tumors. Distinct amplicons at 3q27.1-q27.3 were identified in BRCA1 tumors and at 17q23.3-q24.2 in BRCA2 tumors. A homozygous deletion on 5q12.1 was found in a BRCA1 tumor. Using a set of 169 BAC clones that detect significantly (P < 0.001) different frequencies of copy number changes in inherited and sporadic tumors, these could be discriminated into separate groups using hierarchical clustering. By comparing DNA copy number and RNA expression for genes in these regions, several candidate genes affected by up- or down-regulation were identified. Moreover, using support vector machines, we correctly classified BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors (P < 0.0000004 and 0.00005, respectively). Further validation may prove this tumor classifier to be useful for selecting familial breast cancer cases for further mutation screening, particularly, as these data can be obtained using archival tissue.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Melchor and J. Benitez An integrative hypothesis about the origin and development of sporadic and familial breast cancer subtypes Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2008; 29(8): 1475 - 1482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. M. Suijkerbuijk, M. J. Fackler, S. Sukumar, C. H. van Gils, T. van Laar, E. van der Wall, M. Vooijs, and P. J. van Diest Methylation is less abundant in BRCA1-associated compared with sporadic breast cancer Ann. Onc., July 22, 2008; (2008) mdn409v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. V. Iakovlev, N. C.R. Arneson, V. Wong, C. Wang, S. Leung, G. Iakovleva, K. Warren, M. Pintilie, and S. J. Done Genomic Differences Between Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast and that Associated with Invasive Disease: a Calibrated aCGH Study Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 14(14): 4446 - 4454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Rakha, J. S. Reis-Filho, and I. O. Ellis Basal-Like Breast Cancer: A Critical Review J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2008; 26(15): 2568 - 2581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Melchor, E. Honrado, J. Huang, S. Alvarez, T. L. Naylor, M. J. Garcia, A. Osorio, D. Blesa, M. R. Stratton, B. L. Weber, et al. Estrogen Receptor Status Could Modulate the Genomic Pattern in Familial and Sporadic Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2007; 13(24): 7305 - 7313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Bodvarsdottir, L. Vidarsdottir, and J. E. Eyfjord AURKA and Breast Cancer in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2007; 16(11): 2517 - 2517. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Huang, A. Gusnanto, K. O'Sullivan, J. Staaf, A. Borg, and Y. Pawitan Robust smooth segmentation approach for array CGH data analysis Bioinformatics, September 15, 2007; 23(18): 2463 - 2469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Vincent-Salomon, C. Ganem-Elbaz, E. Manie, V. Raynal, X. Sastre-Garau, D. Stoppa-Lyonnet, M.-H. Stern, and E. Heard X Inactive-Specific Transcript RNA Coating and Genetic Instability of the X Chromosome in BRCA1 Breast Tumors Cancer Res., June 1, 2007; 67(11): 5134 - 5140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Y. Hehir-Kwa, M. Egmont-Petersen, I. M. Janssen, D. Smeets, A. G. van Kessel, and J. A. Veltman Genome-wide Copy Number Profiling on High-density Bacterial Artificial Chromosomes, Single-nucleotide Polymorphisms, and Oligonucleotide Microarrays: A Platform Comparison based on Statistical Power Analysis DNA Res, March 15, 2007; (2007) dsm002v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Harris, M. Lowden, I. Clejan, M. Tzoneva, J. H. Thomas, J. Hodgkin, and S. Ahmed Mutator Phenotype of Caenorhabditis elegans DNA Damage Checkpoint Mutants Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 601 - 616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |