This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Buchanan, G. Articles by Tilley, W. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Buchanan, G. Articles by Tilley, W. D.

Decreased Androgen Receptor Levels and Receptor Function in Breast Cancer Contribute to the Failure of Response to Medroxyprogesterone Acetate

¹ Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, University of Adelaide/Hanson Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; ² Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; and ³ Department of Pathology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Requests for reprints: Wayne D. Tilley, Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, University of Adelaide/Hanson Institute, P.O. Box 14, Rundle Mall, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia. Phone: 61-8-8222-3225; Fax: 61-8-8222-3217; E-mail: wayne.tilley{at}imvs.sa.gov.au.

Previously, we reported that androgen receptor (AR), but not estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR), is predictive of response to the synthetic progestin, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), in a cohort of 83 patients with metastatic breast cancer. To further investigate the role of AR in determining response to MPA in this cohort, we analyzed AR levels by immunohistochemistry with two discrete antisera directed at either the NH₂ or the COOH termini of the receptor. Compared with tumors that responded to MPA (n = 31), there was a significant decrease in the intensity and extent of AR immunoreactivity with both AR antisera in tumors from nonresponders (n = 52). Whereas only a single AR immunostaining pattern was detected in responders to MPA, reflecting concordance of immunoreactivity with the two AR antisera, tumors from nonresponders exhibited four distinct AR immunostaining patterns: (a) concordance with the two antibodies (31%), (b) staining only with the COOH-terminal antibody (33%), (c) staining only with the NH₂-terminal antibody (22%), or (d) no immunoreactivity with either NH₂- or COOH-terminal antibody (14%). DNA sequencing and functional analysis identified inactivating missense gene mutations in the ligand-binding domain of the AR in tumors from two of nine nonresponders positive with the NH₂-terminal AR antisera but negative for COOH-terminal immunoreactivity and lacking specific, high-affinity dihydrotestosterone binding in tumor cytosol fractions. Tumors with more AR than the median level (37 fmol/mg protein) had significantly lower levels of PR (30 fmol/mg protein) than tumors with low AR (PR; 127 fmol/mg protein) despite comparable levels of ER. Ligand-dependent activation of the AR in human T47D and MCF-7 breast cancer cells resulted in inhibition of estradiol-stimulated cell proliferation and a reduction in the capacity of the ER to induce expression of the PR. These effects could be reversed using a specific AR antisense oligonucleotide. Increasing the ratio of AR to ER resulted in a greater androgen-dependent inhibition of ER function. Collectively, these data suggest that reduced levels of AR or impaired AR function contribute to the failure of MPA therapy potentially due to abrogation of the inhibitory effect of AR on ER signaling.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. A. Peters, G. Buchanan, C. Ricciardelli, T. Bianco-Miotto, M. M. Centenera, J. M. Harris, S. Jindal, D. Segara, L. Jia, N. L. Moore, et al. Androgen Receptor Inhibits Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} Activity and Is Prognostic in Breast Cancer Cancer Res., August 1, 2009; 69(15): 6131 - 6140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Papacleovoulou, K. Hogg, K. S. Fegan, H. O.D. Critchley, S. G. Hillier, and J. I. Mason Regulation of 3{beta}-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 and type 2 gene expression and function in the human ovarian surface epithelium by cytokines Mol. Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2009; 15(6): 379 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. K. Mukhopadhyay, J. Kim, B. Cinar, A. Ramachandran, M. H. Hager, D. Di Vizio, R. M. Adam, M. A. Rubin, P. Raychaudhuri, A. De Benedetti, et al. Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein K Is a Novel Regulator of Androgen Receptor Translation Cancer Res., March 15, 2009; 69(6): 2210 - 2218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Buchanan, C. Ricciardelli, J. M. Harris, J. Prescott, Z. C.-L. Yu, L. Jia, L. M. Butler, V. R. Marshall, H. I. Scher, W. L. Gerald, et al. Control of Androgen Receptor Signaling in Prostate Cancer by the Cochaperone Small Glutamine Rich Tetratricopeptide Repeat Containing Protein {alpha} Cancer Res., October 15, 2007; 67(20): 10087 - 10096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. N. Birrell, L. M. Butler, J. M. Harris, G. Buchanan, and W. D. Tilley Disruption of androgen receptor signaling by synthetic progestins may increase risk of developing breast cancer FASEB J, August 1, 2007; 21(10): 2285 - 2293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Schumacher, R. Guennoun, A. Ghoumari, C. Massaad, F. Robert, M. El-Etr, Y. Akwa, K. Rajkowski, and E.-E. Baulieu Novel Perspectives for Progesterone in Hormone Replacement Therapy, with Special Reference to the Nervous System Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2007; 28(4): 387 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]