| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Biology, Pathobiology and Genetics |
1 Department of Pathology and Familial Cancer Clinic of the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 2 Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Information and Communication Theory Group, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands; and 3 Department of Human and Clinical Genetics and Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
Requests for reprints: Erik H. van Beers, Department of Experimental Therapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Room H604, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; E-mail: e.v.beers{at}nki.nl.
BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations cause
30% of breast cancers within high-risk families. This represents 5% of total breast cancer incidence. Although BRCA1 and BRCA2 are both implicated in DNA repair and genome stability, it is unknown whether BRCA1 and BRCA2 are associated with similar or distinct diseases. In a previous study we reported that BRCA1-related breast carcinomas show a distinct genomic profile as determined by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). We now hypothesize that, if functionally equivalent, mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 would result in similar genomic profiles in tumors. Here we report the chromosomal gains and losses as measured by CGH in 25 BRCA2-associated breast tumors and compared them with our existing 36 BRCA1 and 30 control profiles. We compared all chromosomal regions and determined the regions of differential gain or loss between tumor classes and controls. BRCA2 and control tumors have very similar genomic profiles. As a consequence, and in contrast to BRCA1-associated tumors, CGH profiles from BRCA2-associated tumors could not be distinguished from control tumors using the classification methodology as we have developed before. The largest number of significant differences existed between BRCA1 and controls, followed by BRCA1 compared with BRCA2, suggesting different tumor development pathways for BRCA1 and BRCA2.
Key Words: hereditary breast cancer BRCA1 BRCA2 comparative genomic hybridization
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D S P Tan, C Marchio, and J S Reis-Filho Hereditary breast cancer: from molecular pathology to tailored therapies J. Clin. Pathol., October 1, 2008; 61(10): 1073 - 1082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Melchor and J. Benitez An integrative hypothesis about the origin and development of sporadic and familial breast cancer subtypes Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2008; 29(8): 1475 - 1482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Melchor, E. Honrado, J. Huang, S. Alvarez, T. L. Naylor, M. J. Garcia, A. Osorio, D. Blesa, M. R. Stratton, B. L. Weber, et al. Estrogen Receptor Status Could Modulate the Genomic Pattern in Familial and Sporadic Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2007; 13(24): 7305 - 7313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Bodvarsdottir, L. Vidarsdottir, and J. E. Eyfjord AURKA and Breast Cancer in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2007; 16(11): 2517 - 2517. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Huang, A. Gusnanto, K. O'Sullivan, J. Staaf, A. Borg, and Y. Pawitan Robust smooth segmentation approach for array CGH data analysis Bioinformatics, September 15, 2007; 23(18): 2463 - 2469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tischkowitz, B. Xia, N. Sabbaghian, J. S. Reis-Filho, N. Hamel, G. Li, E. H. van Beers, L. Li, T. Khalil, L. A. Quenneville, et al. Analysis of PALB2/FANCN-associated breast cancer families PNAS, April 17, 2007; 104(16): 6788 - 6793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Oldenburg, K. Kroeze-Jansema, H. Meijers-Heijboer, C. J. van Asperen, N. Hoogerbrugge, I. van Leeuwen, H. F.A. Vasen, A.-M. Cleton-Jansen, J. Kraan, J. J. Houwing-Duistermaat, et al. Characterization of Familial Non-BRCA1/2 Breast Tumors by Loss of Heterozygosity and Immunophenotyping. Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 12(6): 1693 - 1700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Rodriguez-Pinilla, D. Sarrio, E. Honrado, D. Hardisson, F. Calero, J. Benitez, and J. Palacios Prognostic Significance of Basal-Like Phenotype and Fascin Expression in Node-Negative Invasive Breast Carcinomas Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2006; 12(5): 1533 - 1539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Melchor, S. Alvarez, E. Honrado, J. Palacios, A. Barroso, O. Diez, A. Osorio, and J. Benitez The Accumulation of Specific Amplifications Characterizes Two Different Genomic Pathways of Evolution of Familial Breast Tumors Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2005; 11(24): 8577 - 8584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Honrado, A. Osorio, J. Palacios, R. L. Milne, L. Sanchez, O. Diez, A. Cazorla, K. Syrjakoski, D. Huntsman, P. Heikkila, et al. Immunohistochemical Expression of DNA Repair Proteins in Familial Breast Cancer Differentiate BRCA2-Associated Tumors J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2005; 23(30): 7503 - 7511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |