| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Biology, Pathobiology, and Genetics |
1 Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom; 2 Human Nutrition Research Centre, School of Clinical Medical Sciences, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom; and 3 Wansbeck Hospital, Ashington, Northumberland, United Kingdom
Requests for reprints: Ian T. Johnson, Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UA, United Kingdom. Phone: 01603-255330; Fax: 01603-255288; E-mail: ian.johnson{at}bbsrc.ac.uk.
Models for the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer tend to focus on the localized lesion, with less attention paid to changes in normal-appearing mucosa. Here we used two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry to define patterns of protein expression in morphologically normal colonic mucosa from 13 healthy subjects, 9 patients with adenomatous polyps, and 9 with cancer. Tumor samples were also compared with the normal mucosa. Systematic gel comparisons identified a total of 839 spots that differed significantly between one or more groups (P < 0.05). Principle component analysis indicated that the first three components accounted for
37% of the total variation and provided clear evidence that flat mucosa from healthy subjects differed significantly from that of patients with polyps or cancer. Sixty-one proteins differed significantly between mucosa from healthy subjects and all other tissue types, and 206 differed significantly between healthy mucosa and polyp mucosa. Several of the proteins showing significant underexpression in tumor tissue were cytokeratins and other cytoskeletal components. In contrast, cytokeratins, including several isoforms of cytokeratin 8, were overexpressed in apparently normal mucosa from polyp and cancer patients compared with mucosa from healthy subjects. These findings indicate that protein expression in the apparently normal colonic mucosal field is modified in individuals with neoplastic lesions at sites distant from the lesion. Recognition and further characterization of this field effect at the molecular level may provide protein biomarkers of susceptibility to colorectal cancer and facilitate development of hypotheses for the role of diet and other environmental factors in its causation. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(13): 6553-62)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. J. Powers, M. H. Hill, M. Welfare, A. Spiers, W. Bal, J. Russell, Y. Duckworth, E. Gibney, E. A. Williams, and J. C. Mathers Responses of Biomarkers of Folate and Riboflavin Status to Folate and Riboflavin Supplementation in Healthy and Colorectal Polyp Patients (The FAB2 Study) Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2007; 16(10): 2128 - 2135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Mathers and J. E. Hesketh The Biological Revolution: Understanding the Impact of SNPs on Diet-Cancer Interrelationships J. Nutr., January 1, 2007; 137(1): 253S - 258S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |