| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Molecular Targets, and Chemical Biology |
1 Department of Oncology, Postgraduate Medical School, Guildford, United Kingdom and 2 Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Requests for reprints: Helmout Modjtahedi, Department of Oncology, Postgraduate Medical School, University of Surrey, Daphne Jackson Road, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7WG, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1483-688582; Fax: 44-1483-688501; E-mail: H.Modjtahedi{at}surrey.ac.uk.
The antiepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody cetuximab has been approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, there is currently no reliable marker for response to therapy with the EGFR inhibitors. In this study, we investigated the sensitivity of 10 human colorectal tumor cell lines (DiFi, CCL218, CCL221, CCL225, CCL227, CCL228, CCL231, CCL235, CCL244, and HCT-116) to treatment with our anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, ICR62, and/or the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, gefitinib. Of the cells examined, only DiFi contained high levels of constitutively active EGFR and were highly sensitive to treatment with both ICR62 (IC50 = 0.52 nmol/L) and gefitinib (IC50 = 27.5 nmol/L). In contrast, the growth of other tumor cell lines, which contained low levels of the EGFR, HER-2, and pAkt but comparable or even higher basal levels of phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinase (pMAPK), were relatively resistant to treatment with both inhibitors. Both ICR62 and gefitinib induced EGFR down-regulation, reduced the basal levels of pEGFR at five known tyrosine residues, pMAPK, and pAkt, and increased the sub-G1 population in DiFi cells. However, treatment with a combination of ICR62 and gefitinib neither sensitized colorectal tumor cells that were insensitive to treatment with the single agent nor enhanced the growth-inhibitory effect of the single agent in DiFi cells. These results indicate that basal levels of pMAPK and pAkt are not good indicators of response to the EGFR inhibitors in colorectal cancer cells and dual targeting of the EGFR by a combination of ICR62 and gefitinib is not superior to treatment with a single agent. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(15): 7708-15)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. C. Manning, N. B. Merchant, A. C. Foutch, J. M. Virostko, S. K. Wyatt, C. Shah, E. T. McKinley, J. Xie, N. J. Mutic, M. K. Washington, et al. Molecular Imaging of Therapeutic Response to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Blockade in Colorectal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2008; 14(22): 7413 - 7422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Personeni, S. Fieuws, H. Piessevaux, G. De Hertogh, J. De Schutter, B. Biesmans, W. De Roock, A. Capoen, M. Debiec-Rychter, J.-L. Van Laethem, et al. Clinical Usefulness of EGFR Gene Copy Number as a Predictive Marker in Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Cetuximab: A Fluorescent In situ Hybridization Study Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2008; 14(18): 5869 - 5876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Martin, A. Miller, L. Emad, M. Rahmani, T. Walker, C. Mitchell, M. P. Hagan, M. A. Park, A. Yacoub, P. B. Fisher, et al. Lapatinib Resistance in HCT116 Cells Is Mediated by Elevated MCL-1 Expression and Decreased BAK Activation and Not by ERBB Receptor Kinase Mutation Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2008; 74(3): 807 - 822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shimura, H. Kataoka, N. Ogasawara, E. Kubota, M. Sasaki, S. Tanida, and T. Joh Suppression of proHB-EGF Carboxy-Terminal Fragment Nuclear Translocation: A New Molecular Target Therapy for Gastric Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3956 - 3965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pessino, S. Artale, S. Sciallero, A. Guglielmi, G. Fornarini, I.C. Andreotti, S. Mammoliti, D. Comandini, F. Caprioni, E. Bennicelli, et al. First-line single-agent cetuximab in patients with advanced colorectal cancer Ann. Onc., April 1, 2008; 19(4): 711 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |