This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fischer, J. A. Articles by Caradonna, S. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fischer, J. A. Articles by Caradonna, S. J.

Fluorodeoxyuridine Modulates Cellular Expression of the DNA Base Excision Repair Enzyme Uracil-DNA Glycosylase

Department of Molecular Biology, School of Osteopathic Medicine and Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Stratford, New Jersey

Requests for reprints: Salvatore J. Caradonna, Department of Molecular Biology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Two Medical Center Drive, Stratford, NJ 08084. Phone: 856-566-6056; Fax: 856-566-6232; E-mail: caradonn{at}umdnj.edu.

The thymidylate synthase inhibitor 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) continues to play a pivotal role in the treatment of cancer. A downstream event of thymidylate synthase inhibition involves the induction of a self-defeating base excision repair process. With the depletion of TTP pools, there is also an increase in dUMP. Metabolism of dUMP to the triphosphate dUTP results in elevated pools of this atypical precursor for DNA synthesis. Under these conditions, there is a destructive cycle of dUMP incorporation into DNA, removal of uracil by the base excision repair enzyme uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG), and reincorporation of dUMP during the synthesis phase of DNA repair. The end point is DNA strand breaks and loss of DNA integrity, which contributes to cell death. Evidence presented here indicates that both the nuclear and the mitochondrial isoforms of UDG are modulated by FdUrd (and 5-FU) treatment in certain cell lines but not in others. Modulation occurs at the transcriptional and post-translational levels. Under normal conditions, nUDG protein appears in G₁ and is degraded during the S to G₂ phase transition. The present study provides evidence that, in certain cell lines, FdUrd mediates an atypical turnover of nUDG. Additional data indicate that, for cell lines that do not down-regulate nUDG, small interfering RNA–mediated knockdown of nUDG significantly increases resistance to the cytotoxic effects of FdUrd. Results from these studies show that nUDG is an additional determinant in FdUrd-mediated cytotoxicity and bolster the notion that the self-defeating base excision repair pathway, instigated by elevated dUTP (FdUTP) pools, contributes to the cytotoxic consequences of 5-FU chemotherapy. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(17): 8829-37)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. M. Wilson, W. Fazzone, M. J. LaBonte, H.-J. Lenz, and R. D. Ladner Regulation of human dUTPase gene expression and p53-mediated transcriptional repression in response to oxaliplatin-induced DNA damage Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2009; 37(1): 78 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Fischer, S. Muller-Weeks, and S. Caradonna A Pitfall of Propidium Iodide Staining in Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting Cell Cycle Analysis? Cancer Res., June 1, 2007; 67(11): 5577 - 5577. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Buchegger, Y. M. Dupertuis, and F. Perillo-Adamer A Pitfall of Propidium Iodide Staining in Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting Cell Cycle Analysis? Cancer Res., June 1, 2007; 67(11): 5576 - 5576. [Full Text] [PDF]