Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2010  Sign up for Cancer Research eTOC's
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, G.
Right arrow Articles by Easton, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, G.
Right arrow Articles by Easton, D. F.
[Cancer Research 66, 1866-1872, February 1, 2006]
© 2006 American Association for Cancer Research


Epidemiology and Prevention

Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers

Gillian Mitchell1, Antonis C. Antoniou3, Ruth Warren4, Susan Peock3, Judith Brown3, Russell Davies6, Jenny Mattison3, Margaret Cook3, Iqbal Warsi4, D. Gareth Evans7, Diana Eccles8, Fiona Douglas9, Joan Paterson5, Shirley Hodgson2, Louise Izatt2, Trevor Cole10 and Lucy Burgess10

EMBRACE collaborators, Ros Eeles1, Douglas F. Easton3

1 Translational Cancer Genetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research and Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Hospital, United Kingdom; 2 Clinical Genetics Department, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; 3 Cancer Research UK Genetic Epidemiology Unit, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, and 4 Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge; 5 Department of Clinical Genetics, East Anglian Regional Genetics Service, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 6 East Devon Breast Screening Program, Breast Care Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom; 7 Academic Unit of Medical Genetics and Regional Genetics Service, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; 8 Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom; 9 Institute of Human Genetics, International Centre for Life, Central Parkway, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; and 10 West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's Hospital Healthcare NHS Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Requsests for reprints: Antonis C. Antoniou, Cancer Research UK Genetic Epidemiology Unit, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1223-740163; Fax: 44-1223-740159; E-mail: antonis{at}srl.cam.ac.uk.

High breast density as measured on mammograms is a strong risk factor for breast cancer in the general population, but its effect in carriers of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is unclear. We obtained mammograms from 206 female carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, 96 of whom were subsequently diagnosed with breast cancer and 136 relatives of carriers who were themselves noncarriers. We compared the mammographic densities of affected carriers (cases) and unaffected carriers (controls), and of mutation carriers and noncarriers, using a computer-assisted method of measurement and visual assessment by two observers. Analyses were adjusted for age, parity, body mass index, menopausal status, and hormone replacement therapy use. There was no difference in the mean percent density between noncarriers and carriers. Among carriers, increasing mammographic density was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (Ptrend = 0.024). The odds ratio (OR; 95% confidence interval) for breast cancer associated with a density of ≥50% was 2.29 (1.23-4.26; P = 0.009). The OR did not differ between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers or between premenopausal and postmenopausal carriers. The results suggest that the distribution of breast density in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers is similar to that in non-carriers. High breast density in carriers is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, with the relative risk being similar to that observed in the general population. Use of mammographic density could improve individual risk prediction in carriers. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(3): 1866-72)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
D. G. R. Evans, F. Lennard, L. J. Pointon, S. J. Ramus, S. A. Gayther, N. Sodha, G. E. Kwan-Lim, M. O. Leach, R. Warren, D. Thompson, et al.
Eligibility for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening in the United Kingdom: Effect of Strict Selection Criteria and Anonymous DNA Testing on Breast Cancer Incidence in the MARIBS Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2009; 18(7): 2123 - 2131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. Kataoka, A. Antoniou, R. Warren, J. Leyland, J. Brown, T. Audley, and D. Easton
Genetic Models for the Familial Aggregation of Mammographic Breast Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2009; 18(4): 1277 - 1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. S. Dite, L. C. Gurrin, G. B. Byrnes, J. Stone, A. Gunasekara, M. R.E. McCredie, D. R. English, G. G. Giles, J. Cawson, R. A. Hegele, et al.
Predictors of Mammographic Density: Insights Gained from a Novel Regression Analysis of a Twin Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2008; 17(12): 3474 - 3481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. Khazen, R. M.L. Warren, C. R.M. Boggis, E. C. Bryant, S. Reed, I. Warsi, L. J. Pointon, G. E. Kwan-Lim, D. Thompson, R. Eeles, et al.
A Pilot Study of Compositional Analysis of the Breast and Estimation of Breast Mammographic Density Using Three-Dimensional T1-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2008; 17(9): 2268 - 2274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. E. Kelemen, V. S. Pankratz, T. A. Sellers, K. R. Brandt, A. Wang, C. Janney, Z. S. Fredericksen, J. R. Cerhan, and C. M. Vachon
Age-specific Trends in Mammographic Density: The Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2008; 167(9): 1027 - 1036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
C. B. Begg, R. W. Haile, A. Borg, K. E. Malone, P. Concannon, D. C. Thomas, B. Langholz, L. Bernstein, J. H. Olsen, C. F. Lynch, et al.
Variation of Breast Cancer Risk Among BRCA1/2 Carriers
JAMA, January 9, 2008; 299(2): 194 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. M.A. Tilanus-Linthorst, I.-M. Obdeijn, W. C.J. Hop, P. A. Causer, M. O. Leach, E. Warner, L. Pointon, K. Hill, J. G.M. Klijn, R. M.L. Warren, et al.
BRCA1 Mutation and Young Age Predict Fast Breast Cancer Growth in the Dutch, United Kingdom, and Canadian Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening Trials
Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2007; 13(24): 7357 - 7362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Robson and K. Offit
Management of an Inherited Predisposition to Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., July 12, 2007; 357(2): 154 - 162.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
A Smith, A Moran, M C Boyd, M Bulman, A Shenton, L Smith, R Iddenden, E R Woodward, F Lalloo, E R Maher, et al.
Phenocopies in BRCA1 and BRCA2 families: evidence for modifier genes and implications for screening
J. Med. Genet., January 1, 2007; 44(1): 10 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Association for Cancer Research.