| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Molecular Targets, and Chemical Biology |
1 The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center and 2 Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Requests for reprints: Manuel Hidalgo, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, 1650 Orleans Street, Room 1M89, Baltimore, MD 21231-1000. Phone: 410-502-3850; Fax: 410-614-9006; E-mail: mhidalg1{at}jhmi.edu.
Factors predicting sensitivity to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) blockade are largely unknown and new strategies are being sought to individualize cancer therapy. This study evaluated the variation in the expression of the early response gene c-fos as a distal effect of EGFR inhibition and its relationship to antitumor effects. The growth-inhibitory and c-fosmodulating effects of gefitinib and erlotinib in human cancer cell lines (A431, CAL27, HN11, HuCCT1, and Hep2) were determined. Next, these cell lines were xenografted in mice and treated for 14 days with gefitinib (A431 and HuCCT1) or erlotinib (CAL27, HN11, and Hep2). Fine needle aspiration biopsy of tumors was done at baseline and after 14 days of therapy for c-fos assessment. In addition, we tested the feasibility of analyzing this marker in five paired tumor samples from a clinical trial of gefitinib in patients with solid tumors. In culture, gefitinib and erlotinib decreased c-fos mRNA levels in the susceptible cell lines A431, CAL27, and HN11; however, both drugs failed to achieve c-fos inhibition in resistant cells. Gefitinib or erlotinib abrogated the increase in c-fos expression in vivo in EGFR-sensitive A431, CAL27, and HN11 tumors but not in resistant strains. Ex vivo evaluation was feasible and predicted in vivo effects. The feasibility study in paired human tumor biopsies showed that this biomarker can be reliably measured in clinical materials. In summary, variations in c-fos expression reflect the pharmacologic actions of EGFR inhibitors in in vitro and in vivo models. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(4): 2385-90)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Jimeno, A. C. Tan, J. Coffa, N.V. Rajeshkumar, P. Kulesza, B. Rubio-Viqueira, J. Wheelhouse, B. Diosdado, W. A. Messersmith, C. Iacobuzio-Donahue, et al. Coordinated Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Pathway Gene Overexpression Predicts Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Sensitivity in Pancreatic Cancer Cancer Res., April 15, 2008; 68(8): 2841 - 2849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Buck, A. Eyzaguirre, S. Barr, S. Thompson, R. Sennello, D. Young, K. K. Iwata, N. W. Gibson, P. Cagnoni, and J. D. Haley Loss of homotypic cell adhesion by epithelial-mesenchymal transition or mutation limits sensitivity to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2007; 6(2): 532 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hidalgo, M. L. Amador, A. Jimeno, H. Mezzadra, P. Patel, A. Chan, M. E. Nielsen, A. Maitra, and S. Altiok Assessment of gefitinib- and CI-1040-mediated changes in epidermal growth factor receptor signaling in HuCCT-1 human cholangiocarcinoma by serial fine needle aspiration. Mol. Cancer Ther., July 1, 2006; 5(7): 1895 - 1903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |