This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lippman, S. M. Articles by Lee, J. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lippman, S. M. Articles by Lee, J. J. Related Collections Commentary Risk Assessment: Biomarkers Clinical Intervention:Molecular Targeted Drugs Clinical Intervention: Intraepithelial Neoplasia/Premalignancy

Reducing the "Risk" of Chemoprevention: Defining and Targeting High Risk—2005 AACR Cancer Research and Prevention Foundation Award Lecture

Departments of ¹ Clinical Cancer Prevention and Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology and ² Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

Requests for reprints: Scott M. Lippman, Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 432, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030-4009. Phone: 713-792-6363; Fax: 713-745-2012; E-mail: slippman{at}mdanderson.org.

Two large-scale, phase III cancer prevention trials, the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT) of tamoxifen and Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) of finasteride, concluded with strikingly positive and simultaneously problematic results: reduced cancer risks but a major adverse finding with each agent that prevented its widespread use in the community. For most moderate-risk people, such as those studied in the BCPT and PCPT, the benefit of reduced breast or prostate cancer does not outweigh the major risk of tamoxifen (endometrial cancer in the BCPT) or apparent risk of finasteride (high-grade prostate cancer in the PCPT). Promising interventions with biologically active substances are likely to have adverse, perhaps unforeseen effects, especially with long-term preventive use. Acceptance of such agents will depend heavily on the level of cancer risk of the target population. This article outlines research in molecularly identified high-risk oral intraepithelial neoplasia that creates the clinical opportunity for optimizing the risk-benefit ratio of agents to prevent oral cancer. Two other major research efforts focused on improving preventive agent risk-benefit ratios are molecular-targeted research designed to target away from known adverse signaling pathways and multidisciplinary research based on the PCPT that will develop comprehensive models of prostate cancer risk (especially of aggressive prostate cancer) and pharmacoecogenetic models for identifying high-risk men most likely to benefit from (and not be harmed by) finasteride or similar (5-reductase inhibiting) agents. Defining and targeting high-risk populations, developing molecular-targeted approaches, and developing accurate pharmacoecogenetic models promise to reduce the risk of chemoprevention and ultimately to reduce the risk and burden of major cancers. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(6): 2893-903)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. A. Papadimitrakopoulou, W. N. William Jr., A. J. Dannenberg, S. M. Lippman, J. J. Lee, F. G. Ondrey, D. E. Peterson, L. Feng, A. Atwell, A. K. El-Naggar, et al. Pilot Randomized Phase II Study of Celecoxib in Oral Premalignant Lesions Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2008; 14(7): 2095 - 2101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. L. Meyskens Jr. Another Negative Chemoprevention Trial: What Can We Learn? Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 2 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Hoque, H. L. Parnes, M. E. Stefanek, J. V. Heymach, P. H. Brown, and S. M. Lippman Meeting Report: Fifth Annual AACR Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 67(19): 8989 - 8993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. M. Thompson, D. Pauler Ankerst, C. Chi, P. J. Goodman, C. M. Tangen, S. M. Lippman, M. S. Lucia, H. L. Parnes, and C. A. Coltman Jr Prediction of Prostate Cancer for Patients Receiving Finasteride: Results From the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2007; 25(21): 3076 - 3081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Lippman and J. V. Heymach The Convergent Development of Molecular-Targeted Drugs for Cancer Treatment and Prevention Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2007; 13(14): 4035 - 4041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. F. Poh, L. Zhang, D. W. Anderson, J. S. Durham, P. M. Williams, R. W. Priddy, K. W. Berean, S. Ng, O. L. Tseng, C. MacAulay, et al. Fluorescence Visualization Detection of Field Alterations in Tumor Margins of Oral Cancer Patients. Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2006; 12(22): 6716 - 6722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. Kelloff, S. M. Lippman, A. J. Dannenberg, C. C. Sigman, H. L. Pearce, B. J. Reid, E. Szabo, V. C. Jordan, M. R. Spitz, G. B. Mills, et al. Progress in Chemoprevention Drug Development: The Promise of Molecular Biomarkers for Prevention of Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cancer--A Plan to Move Forward Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2006; 12(12): 3661 - 3697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Lippman, J. J. Lee, J. W. Martin, A. K. El-Naggar, X. Xu, D. M. Shin, M. Thomas, L. Mao, H. A. Fritsche Jr., X. Zhou, et al. Fenretinide Activity in Retinoid-Resistant Oral Leukoplakia. Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2006; 12(10): 3109 - 3114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]