| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Clinical Research |
1 The Gade Institute, Section for Pathology and 2 Department of Clinical Medicine, Section for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Bergen, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Requests for reprints: Lars A. Akslen, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Vascular Biology Program (Folkman Lab), Karp Family Research Labs 12.125, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115-5737. Phone: 617-919-2426; Fax: 617-739-5891; E-mail: lars.akslen{at}childrens.harvard.edu or lars.akslen{at}gades.uib.no.
Angiogenesis is essential for tumor growth, invasion, and metastatic spread. Whereas microvessel density (MVD) has been widely used as a measure of tumor-associated angiogenesis, we now wanted to examine the significance of other angiogenic markers, especially vascular proliferation (by Ki-67/factor VIII staining) and the degree of pericyte coverage [by
-smooth muscle actin (
-SMA)/factor VIII staining], in a large and population-based series of endometrial carcinoma with complete follow-up. Due to limited information on the role of lymphangiogenesis in these tumors, lymphatic vessel density (LVD) by LYVE-1 staining was also determined, as well as selected angiogenic factors [vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-D and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF)], which could possibly be related to vascular proliferation and lymphangiogenesis. The information on angiogenic phenotype was related to clinicopathologic features and disease progress. Median vascular proliferation, as estimated by vascular proliferation index (VPI), was 3.9% and high VPI was associated with features of aggressive tumors and decreased survival. The prognostic effect of VPI was superior to that of MVD. Presence of pericyte coverage, as estimated by the
-SMA index (SMAI), was 35% and low SMAI was significantly associated with vascular invasion by tumor cells and impaired prognosis. Peritumoral lymphatic vessels (LVD-pt) were found in 39.5% of the cases and high LVD-pt was significantly associated with aggressive tumor features and decreased survival. In multivariate survival analysis, only the extent of vascular proliferation had independent prognostic effect, in addition to well-known clinicopathologic factors, whereas MVD did not have significant prognostic value. In conclusion, our study indicates that vascular proliferation is a meaningful variable in assessing the angiogenic phenotype of endometrial carcinoma. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(6): 3303-9)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Gravdal, O. J. Halvorsen, S. A. Haukaas, and L. A. Akslen Proliferation of Immature Tumor Vessels Is a Novel Marker of Clinical Progression in Prostate Cancer Cancer Res., June 1, 2009; 69(11): 4708 - 4715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. N. Naumov, M. B. Nilsson, T. Cascone, A. Briggs, O. Straume, L. A. Akslen, E. Lifshits, L. A. Byers, L. Xu, H.-k. Wu, et al. Combined Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Blockade Inhibits Tumor Growth in Xenograft Models of EGFR Inhibitor Resistance Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2009; 15(10): 3484 - 3494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Kamat, W. M. Merritt, D. Coffey, Y. G. Lin, P. R. Patel, R. Broaddus, E. Nugent, L. Y. Han, C. N. Landen Jr., W. A. Spannuth, et al. Clinical and Biological Significance of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Endometrial Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2007; 13(24): 7487 - 7495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Donoghue, F. L. Lederman, B. J. Susil, and P. A.W. Rogers Lymphangiogensis of normal endometrium and endometrial adenocarcinoma Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1705 - 1713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Takahashi, Y. Akishima-Fukasawa, N. Kobayashi, T. Sano, T. Kosuge, Y. Nimura, Y. Kanai, and N. Hiraoka Prognostic Value of Tumor Architecture, Tumor-Associated Vascular Characteristics, and Expression of Angiogenic Molecules in Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2007; 13(1): 187 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |