This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Data Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gu, G. Articles by Kasper, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gu, G. Articles by Kasper, S.

Prostate Cancer Cells with Stem Cell Characteristics Reconstitute the Original Human Tumor In vivo

¹ Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center; ² Department of Pathology, Vanderbilt Childrens Hospital; and ³ The Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee

Requests for reprints: Susan Kasper, Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, A-1302 Medical Center North, 1161 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37232-2765. Phone: 615-343-5921; Fax: 615-322-8990; E-mail: susan.kasper{at}vanderbilt.edu.

Cancer may arise from a cancer stem/progenitor cell that shares characteristics with its normal counterpart. We report the reconstitution of the original human prostate cancer specimen from epithelial cell lines (termed HPET for human prostate epithelial/hTERT) derived from this sample. These tumors can be described in terms of Gleason score, a classification not applied to any of the transgenic mouse models currently developed to mimic human disease. Immunohistochemical and Western blot analyses indicate that they do not express androgen receptor or p63, similar to that reported for prostate stem cells. These cell lines also express embryonic stem markers (Oct4, Nanog, and Sox2) as well as early progenitor cell markers (CD44 and Nestin) in vitro. Clonally derived HPET cells reconstitute the original human tumor in vivo and differentiate into the three prostate epithelial cell lineages, indicating that they arise from a common stem/progenitor cell. Serial transplantation experiments reconstitute the tumors, suggesting that a fraction of parental or clonally derived HPET cells have self-renewal potential. Thus, this model may enhance our understanding of human tumor development and provide a mechanism for studying cancer stem/progenitor cells in differentiation, tumorigenesis, preclinical testing, and the development of drug resistance. [Cancer Res 2007;67(10):4807–15]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S.-H. Chiou, C.-C. Yu, C.-Y. Huang, S.-C. Lin, C.-J. Liu, T.-H. Tsai, S.-H. Chou, C.-S. Chien, H.-H. Ku, and J.-F. Lo Positive Correlations of Oct-4 and Nanog in Oral Cancer Stem-Like Cells and High-Grade Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2008; 14(13): 4085 - 4095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. J. Maitland and A. T. Collins Prostate Cancer Stem Cells: A New Target for Therapy J. Clin. Oncol., June 10, 2008; 26(17): 2862 - 2870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Mimeault, P. P. Mehta, R. Hauke, and S. K. Batra Functions of Normal and Malignant Prostatic Stem/Progenitor Cells in Tissue Regeneration and Cancer Progression and Novel Targeting Therapies Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2008; 29(2): 234 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. P. Hill and R. Perris "Destemming" Cancer Stem Cells J Natl Cancer Inst, October 3, 2007; 99(19): 1435 - 1440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]