| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Molecular Targets, and Chemical Biology |
1 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and the Departments of 2 Medicine and 3 Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, and 4 Aletheon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Seattle, Washington
Requests for reprints: John Pagel, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue N, M/S D5-380, Seattle, WA 98109. Phone: 206-667-1868; Fax: 206-667-4111; E-mail: jpagel{at}fhcrc.org.
Despite the promise of radioimmunotherapy using anti-CD20 antibodies (Ab) for the treatment of relapsed patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), most patients treated with conventional doses of 131I-tositumomab or 90Y-ibritumomab eventually relapse. We did comparative assessments using conventional radioimmunotherapy targeting CD20, CD22, and HLA-DR on human Ramos, Raji, and FL-18 lymphoma xenografts in athymic mice to assess the potential for improving the efficacy of radioimmunotherapy by targeting other NHL cell surface antigens. Results of biodistribution studies showed significant differences in tumor localization consistent with variable antigenic expression on the different lymphoma cell lines. Interestingly, the radioimmunoconjugate that yielded the best tumor-to-normal organ ratios differed in each tumor model. We also explored administering all three 111In-1,4,7,10-tetra-azacylododecane N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid antibodies in combination, but discovered, surprisingly, that this approach did not augment the localization of radioactivity to tumors compared with the administration of the best single radiolabeled Ab alone. These data suggest that conventional radioimmunotherapy using anti-CD20, antiHLA-DR, or anti-CD22 Abs is effective when used singly and provides targeted uptake of radiolabel into the tumor that is dependent on the levels of antigen expression. Improvements in tumor-to-normal organ ratios of radioactivity cannot be achieved using directly labeled Abs in combination but may be afforded by novel pretargeting methods. [Cancer Res 2007;67(12):59218]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Pagel, N. Orgun, D. K. Hamlin, D. S. Wilbur, T. A. Gooley, A. K. Gopal, S. I. Park, D. J. Green, Y. Lin, and O. W. Press A comparative analysis of conventional and pretargeted radioimmunotherapy of B-cell lymphomas by targeting CD20, CD22, and HLA-DR singly and in combinations Blood, May 14, 2009; 113(20): 4903 - 4913. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Illidge, M. Bayne, N. S. Brown, S. Chilton, M. S. Cragg, M. J. Glennie, Y. Du, V. Lewington, J. Smart, J. Thom, et al. Phase 1/2 study of fractionated 131I-rituximab in low-grade B-cell lymphoma: the effect of prior rituximab dosing and tumor burden on subsequent radioimmunotherapy Blood, February 12, 2009; 113(7): 1412 - 1421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Sharkey, H. Karacay, S. Litwin, E. A. Rossi, W. J. McBride, C.-H. Chang, and D. M. Goldenberg Improved Therapeutic Results by Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma with a New Recombinant, Trivalent, Anti-CD20, Bispecific Antibody Cancer Res., July 1, 2008; 68(13): 5282 - 5290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Green, J. M. Pagel, A. Pantelias, N. Hedin, Y. Lin, D. S. Wilbur, A. Gopal, D. K. Hamlin, and O. W. Press Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy for B-Cell Lymphomas Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 13(18): 5598s - 5603s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |