This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Data Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dalton, W. B. Articles by Yang, V. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dalton, W. B. Articles by Yang, V. W.

Human Cancer Cells Commonly Acquire DNA Damage during Mitotic Arrest

¹ Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, ² Biochemistry, Cell and Developmental Biology Graduate Program, and ³ Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; and ⁴ Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Requests for reprints: Vincent W. Yang, Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 201 Whitehead Research Building, 615 Michael Street, Atlanta, GA 30322. Phone: 404-727-5638; Fax: 404-727-5767; E-mail: vyang{at}emory.edu.

The mitotic checkpoint is a mechanism that arrests the progression to anaphase until all chromosomes have achieved proper attachment to mitotic spindles. In cancer cells, satisfaction of this checkpoint is frequently delayed or prevented by various defects, some of which have been causally implicated in tumorigenesis. At the same time, deliberate induction of mitotic arrest has proved clinically useful, as antimitotic drugs that interfere with proper chromosome-spindle interactions are effective anticancer agents. However, how mitotic arrest contributes to tumorigenesis or antimitotic drug toxicity is not well defined. Here, we report that mitotic chromosomes can acquire DNA breaks during both pharmacologic and genetic induction of mitotic arrest in human cancer cells. These breaks activate a DNA damage response, occur independently of cell death, and subsequently manifest as karyotype alterations. Such breaks can also occur spontaneously, particularly in cancer cells containing mitotic spindle abnormalities. Moreover, we observed evidence of some breakage in primary human cells. Our findings thus describe a novel source of DNA damage in human cells. They also suggest that mitotic arrest may promote tumorigenesis and antimitotic toxicity by provoking DNA damage. [Cancer Res 2007;67(24):11487–92]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Swanton, B. Nicke, M. Schuett, A. C. Eklund, C. Ng, Q. Li, T. Hardcastle, A. Lee, R. Roy, P. East, et al. Chromosomal instability determines taxane response PNAS, May 26, 2009; 106(21): 8671 - 8676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Storchova and C. Kuffer The consequences of tetraploidy and aneuploidy J. Cell Sci., December 1, 2008; 121(23): 3859 - 3866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Olmos, C. Swanton, and J. de Bono Targeting Polo-Like Kinase: Learning Too Little Too Late? J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2008; 26(34): 5497 - 5499. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Agarwal and G. Deep Kava, a Tonic for Relieving the Irrational Development of Natural Preventive Agents Cancer Prevention Research, November 1, 2008; 1(6): 409 - 412. [Full Text] [PDF]