| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Molecular Targets, and Chemical Biology |
1 Center for Molecular Therapeutics, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts and 2 Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Requests for reprints: Jeffrey Settleman, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129. Phone: 617-724-9556; Fax: 617-726-7808; E-mail: settleman{at}helix.mgh.harvard.edu.
Somatic mutations within the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase domain are detected in 10% to 30% of human nonsmall cell lung cancers and are correlated with striking clinical responses in a subset of patients treated with EGFR kinase inhibitors, such as gefitinib and erlotinib. Cell-based studies suggest that these mutant EGFRs promote increased autophosphorylating activity on a subset of EGFR COOH-terminal tyrosines and the consequent engagement of a subset of downstream effectors. Because EGFR function is regulated at multiple levels in vivo, and it is therefore difficult to assess the direct consequences of these mutations on EGFR enzyme function, we measured EGFR catalytic activity in in vitro kinase assays using purified recombinant proteins corresponding to the cytoplasmic domain of wild-type and two frequently detected EGFR mutants (DelL747-P753insS and L858R). Both mutants exhibit substantially increased autophosphorylating activity relative to wild-type EGFR, and they exhibit distinct reaction kinetics. In addition, the mutant kinases are more sensitive to kinase inhibition by gefitinib, which seems to reflect their increased drug affinity. These findings suggest that the altered signaling properties and drug sensitivity of these EGFR mutants that have been observed in vivo largely result from differences in the catalytic properties of the kinase. In addition, we find that the T790M secondary "drug resistance mutation" of EGFR, which frequently arises in relapsed patients that initially responded to treatment, confers enhanced kinase activity to primary activating EGFR alleles and may, therefore, be oncogenic in some contexts. [Cancer Res 2007;67(5):232530]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. M. Rothenberg, J. A. Engelman, S. Le, D. J. Riese II, D. A. Haber, and J. Settleman Modeling oncogene addiction using RNA interference PNAS, August 26, 2008; 105(34): 12480 - 12484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shimamura, D. Li, H. Ji, H. J. Haringsma, E. Liniker, C. L. Borgman, A. M. Lowell, Y. Minami, K. McNamara, S. A. Perera, et al. Hsp90 Inhibition Suppresses Mutant EGFR-T790M Signaling and Overcomes Kinase Inhibitor Resistance Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 68(14): 5827 - 5838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G D Smith, B E Chadwick, C Willmore-Payne, and J S Bentz Detection of epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in cytology specimens from patients with non-small cell lung cancer utilising high-resolution melting amplicon analysis J. Clin. Pathol., April 1, 2008; 61(4): 487 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Peipp, T. Schneider-Merck, M. Dechant, T. Beyer, J. J. Lammerts van Bueren, W. K. Bleeker, P. W. H. I. Parren, J. G. J. van de Winkel, and T. Valerius Tumor Cell Killing Mechanisms of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Antibodies Are Not Affected by Lung Cancer-Associated EGFR Kinase Mutations J. Immunol., March 15, 2008; 180(6): 4338 - 4345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Eberhard, G. Giaccone, and B. E. Johnson Biomarkers of Response to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Working Group: Standardization for Use in the Clinical Trial Setting J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2008; 26(6): 983 - 994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Guo, J. Villen, J. Kornhauser, K. A. Lee, M. P. Stokes, K. Rikova, A. Possemato, J. Nardone, G. Innocenti, R. Wetzel, et al. Signaling networks assembled by oncogenic EGFR and c-Met PNAS, January 15, 2008; 105(2): 692 - 697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. V. Sharma and J. Settleman Oncogene addiction: setting the stage for molecularly targeted cancer therapy Genes & Dev., December 15, 2007; 21(24): 3214 - 3231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |