| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cell, Tumor, and Stem Cell Biology |
1 Medical Research Council-Cancer Cell Unit, Hutchison/Medical Research Council Research Center; 2 Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Requests for reprints: Nicholas Coleman, Medical Research Council-Cancer Cell Unit, Medical Research Council/Hutchison Research Center, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0XZ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1223-763285; Fax: 44-1223-763284; E-mail: nc109{at}cam.ac.uk.
Key Words: human papillomavirus cervix neoplastic progression integration common fragile site
As the high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) integrants seen in anogenital carcinomas represent the end-point of a clonal selection process, we used the W12 model to study the naturally occurring integration events that exist in HPV16-infected cervical keratinocytes before integrant selection. We performed limiting dilution cloning to identify integrants present in cells that also maintain episomes. Such integrants arise in a natural context and exist in a noncompetitive environment, as they are transcriptionally repressed by episome-derived E2. We found that integration can occur at any time during episome maintenance, providing biological support for epidemiologic observations that persistent HPV infection is a major risk factor in cervical carcinogenesis. Of 24 different integration sites isolated from a single nonclonal population of W12, 12 (50%) occurred within chromosome bands containing a common fragile site (CFS), similar to observations for selected integrants in vivo. This suggests that such regions represent relatively accessible sites for insertion of foreign DNA, rather than conferring a selective advantage when disrupted. Interestingly, however, integrants and CFSs did not accurately colocalize. We further observed that local DNA rearrangements occur frequently and rapidly after the integration event. The majority of integrants were in chromosome bands containing a cancer-associated coding gene or microRNA, indicating that integration occurs commonly in these regions, regardless of selective pressure. The cancer-associated genes were generally a considerable distance from the integration site, and there was no evidence for altered expression of nine strong candidate genes. These latter observations do not support an important role for HPV16 integration in causing insertional mutagenesis. [Cancer Res 2008;68(20):8249–59]
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |