| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Priority Reports |
1 Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, 2 Department of Pathology, 3 Department of Urology, 4 Bioinformatics Program, and 5 Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School; and 6 Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Requests for reprints: Arul M. Chinnaiyan, University of Michigan Medical School, 1400 East Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0602. Phone: 734-615-4062; Fax: 734-615-4498; E-mail: arul{at}umich.edu.
Key Words: prostate cancer biomarker urine detection serum PSA PCA3
Although prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum level is currently the standard of care for prostate cancer screening in the United States, it lacks ideal specificity and additional biomarkers are needed to supplement or potentially replace serum PSA testing. Emerging evidence suggests that monitoring the noncoding RNA transcript PCA3 in urine may be useful in detecting prostate cancer in patients with elevated PSA levels. Here, we show that a multiplex panel of urine transcripts outperforms PCA3 transcript alone for the detection of prostate cancer. We measured the expression of seven putative prostate cancer biomarkers, including PCA3, in sedimented urine using quantitative PCR on a cohort of 234 patients presenting for biopsy or radical prostatectomy. By univariate analysis, we found that increased GOLPH2, SPINK1, and PCA3 transcript expression and TMPRSS2:ERG fusion status were significant predictors of prostate cancer. Multivariate regression analysis showed that a multiplexed model, including these biomarkers, outperformed serum PSA or PCA3 alone in detecting prostate cancer. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.758 for the multiplexed model versus 0.662 for PCA3 alone (P = 0.003). The sensitivity and specificity for the multiplexed model were 65.9% and 76.0%, respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 79.8% and 60.8%, respectively. Taken together, these results provide the framework for the development of highly optimized, multiplex urine biomarker tests for more accurate detection of prostate cancer. [Cancer Res 2008;68(3):645–9]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-M. Mosquera, R. Mehra, M. M. Regan, S. Perner, E. M. Genega, G. Bueti, R. B. Shah, S. Gaston, S. A. Tomlins, J. T. Wei, et al. Prevalence of TMPRSS2-ERG Fusion Prostate Cancer among Men Undergoing Prostate Biopsy in the United States Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2009; 15(14): 4706 - 4711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. STEPHAN, H. RITTENHOUSE, H. CAMMANN, M. LEIN, M. SCHRADER, S. DEGER, K. MILLER, and K. JUNG New Markers and Multivariate Models for Prostate Cancer Detection Anticancer Res, July 1, 2009; 29(7): 2589 - 2600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Russo, K. Jedlicka, M. Wernick, D. McNally, M. Kirk, M. Sproull, S. Smith, U. Shankavaram, A. Kaushal, W. D. Figg, et al. Urine Analysis and Protein Networking Identify Met as a Marker of Metastatic Prostate Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2009; 15(13): 4292 - 4298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Rickman, D. Pflueger, B. Moss, V. E. VanDoren, C. X. Chen, A. de la Taille, R. Kuefer, A. K. Tewari, S. R. Setlur, F. Demichelis, et al. SLC45A3-ELK4 Is a Novel and Frequent Erythroblast Transformation-Specific Fusion Transcript in Prostate Cancer Cancer Res., April 1, 2009; 69(7): 2734 - 2738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Sardana, B. Dowell, and E. P. Diamandis Emerging Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer Clin. Chem., December 1, 2008; 54(12): 1951 - 1960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Clark, K. W. Munson, J. W. Gu, K. Lamparska-Kupsik, K. G. Chan, J. S. Yoshida, M. H. Kawachi, L. E. Crocitto, T. G. Wilson, Z. Feng, et al. Performance of a Single Assay for Both Type III and Type VI TMPRSS2:ERG Fusions in Noninvasive Prediction of Prostate Biopsy Outcome Clin. Chem., December 1, 2008; 54(12): 2007 - 2017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Frohling and H. Dohner Chromosomal Abnormalities in Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., August 14, 2008; 359(7): 722 - 734. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |