| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Immunology |
Departments of 1 Microbiology and Immunology and 2 Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, Virginia; 3 Immunogenetics Laboratory, Department of Transfusion Medicine, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland; 4 Genelux Corp., San Diego Science Center, San Diego, California; 5 Institute for Biochemistry and 6 Virchow Center for Experimental Biomedicine, Institute for Biochemistry and Institute for Molecular Infection Biology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany; and 7 Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
Requests for reprints: Masoud H. Manjili, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Massey Cancer Center, Box 980035, 401 College Street, Richmond, VA 23298. Phone: 804-828-8779; Fax: 804-845-8453; E-mail: mmanjili{at}vcu.edu.
Key Words: HER-2/neu FVBN202 breast cancer tumor escape IFN-stimulated genes
We have previously shown T-cell–mediated rejection of the neu-overexpressing mammary carcinoma cells (MMC) in wild-type FVB mice. However, following rejection of primary tumors, a fraction of animals experienced a recurrence of a neu antigen-negative variant (ANV) of MMC (tumor evasion model) after a long latency period. In the present study, we determined that T cells derived from wild-type FVB mice can specifically recognize MMC by secreting IFN-
and can induce apoptosis of MMC in vitro. Neu transgenic (FVBN202) mice develop spontaneous tumors and cannot reject it (tumor tolerance model). To dissect the mechanisms associated with rejection or tolerance of MMC tumors, we compared transcriptional patterns within the tumor microenvironment of MMC undergoing rejection with those that resisted it either because of tumor evasion/antigen loss recurrence (ANV tumors) or because of intrinsic tolerance mechanisms displayed by the transgenic mice. Gene profiling confirmed that immune rejection is primarily mediated through activation of IFN-stimulated genes and T-cell effector mechanisms. The tumor evasion model showed combined activation of Th1 and Th2 with a deviation toward Th2 and humoral immune responses that failed to achieve rejection likely because of lack of target antigen. Interestingly, the tumor tolerance model instead displayed immune suppression pathways through activation of regulatory mechanisms that included in particular the overexpression of interleukin-10 (IL-10), IL-10 receptor, and suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS)-1 and SOCS-3. These data provide a road map for the identification of novel biomarkers of immune responsiveness in clinical trials. [Cancer Res 2008;68(7):2436–46]
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |