Cancer Research Donn Young  EMT and Cancer Progression and Treatment
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Cancer Research 69, 7499, October 1, 2009. Published Online First September 14, 2009;
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1354
© 2009 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0008-5472.CAN-09-1354v1
69/19/7499    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gatenby, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vincent, T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gatenby, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vincent, T.

Perspectives in Cancer Research

Lessons from Applied Ecology: Cancer Control Using an Evolutionary Double Bind

Robert A. Gatenby1, Joel Brown2 and Thomas Vincent3

1 Departments of Radiology and Integrative Mathematical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida; 2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois; and 3 Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

Requests for reprints: Robert A. Gatenby, Department of Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612. Phone: 813-745-2843; Fax: 813-745-6070; E-mail: Robert.Gatenby{at}Moffitt.org.

Abstract

Because the metastatic cascade is largely governed by the ability of malignant cells to adapt and proliferate at the distant tissue site, we propose that disseminated cancers are analogous in many important ways to the evolutionary and ecological dynamics of exotic species. Although pests can be decimated through the application of chemical toxins, this strategy virtually never achieves robust control as evolution of resistant phenotypes typically permits population recovery to pretreatment levels. In general, biological strategies that introduce predators, parasitoids, or pathogens have achieved more durable control of pest populations even after emergence of resistant phenotypes. From this we propose that long term outcome from any treatment strategy for invasive pests, including cancer, is not limited by evolution of resistance, but rather by the phenotypic cost of that resistance. If a cancerous cell's adaptation to therapy is achieved by upregulating xenobiotic metabolism or a redundant signaling pathway, the required investment in resources is small, and the original malignant phenotype remains essentially intact. As a result, the cancer cells' initial high level of fitness is little changed and unconstrained proliferation will resume once resistance evolves. Robust population control is possible if resistance to therapy requires a substantial and costly phenotypic adaptation that also significantly reduces the organism's fitness in its original niche: an evolutionary double bind. [Cancer Res 2009;69(19):7499–502]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2009 by the American Association for Cancer Research.