Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 9, 741-746, December 1, 1949]
© 1949 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boutwell, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rusch, H. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boutwell, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rusch, H. P.

The Stimulating Effect of Dietary Fat on Carcinogenesis*

R. K. Boutwell, Ph.D., Miriam K. Brush, Ph.D. and H. P. Rusch, M.D.

(From the McArdle Memorial Laboratory, Medical School, University of Wisconsin, Madison 6, Wisconsin)

1. The relationship of dietary fat to the incidence of carcinomas induced in mice with carcinogenic hydrocarbons was investigated. Synthetic type diets were fed in which caloric intake was varied by removing glucose from the ration and the level of fat was increased from 2 per cent to 27 per cent or to 61 per cent by isocaloric substitution for glucose.
2. The diet containing 61 per cent fat and no carbohydrate stimulated carcinogenesis about the same as diets containing 27 per cent fat. This suggested that dietary fat per se does not promote the formation of skin carcinomas induced with benzpyrene.
3. When the tumor promoting action of diets containing 2 per cent and 27 per cent fat were compared at two calorie levels it was shown that the greater net energy value of the higher fat diet was sufficient to account for all of the stimulating effect of the 27 per cent fat diet on tumor formation.
4. For a true appraisal of the effect of the three major dietary components on the induction of tumors, the diets should be fed on the basis of an equal net energy value rather than isocaloric allowances calculated from the gross caloric values of the dietary components.
5. Mice that were fed a diet containing 61 per cent of fat and no carbohydrate for 254 days gained weight and appeared normal.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
Z. Zhu, W. Jiang, and H. J. Thompson
Mechanisms by which energy restriction inhibits rat mammary carcinogenesis: in vivo effects of corticosterone on cell cycle machinery in mammary carcinomas
Carcinogenesis, July 1, 2003; 24(7): 1225 - 1231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1949 by the American Association for Cancer Research.