| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Advances in Brief |
Departments of Clinical Cancer Prevention [J. L. C., D. G. M., M. W., S. M. L.] and Tumor Biology [R. L.], The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, retinoid X receptor
, or both. 4HPR (10 µM) treatment resulted in a rapid induction of cell death in F9 cells, which was responsible for their near elimination by 48 h. This effect occurred in the receptor-null cell lines as well. Treatment of the wild-type cells for 4 days with 1 µM 4HPR also resulted in a primitive endodermal differentiated phenotype that is normally seen upon all-trans-retinoic acid treatment and is characterized by the up-regulation of laminin B1 and type IV collagen. This differentiation response did not occur in the receptor-null cells. Therefore, two distinct effects of 4HPR were identified in this system: a rapid induction of cell death and a slower induction of differentiation, which are likely to be receptor independent and dependent, respectively. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The F9 murine embryonal carcinoma cell line, a well-established model system for the study of retinoid-induced differentiation, is highly sensitive to a variety of retinoid effects (5)
. These cells resemble the pluripotent stem cells of the inner cell mass of the early mouse embryo and, depending on the culture conditions, differentiate into three distinct endodermal cell types (primitive, parietal, and visceral) upon treatment with ATRA. In addition to differentiation, retinoids induce both antiproliferative and apoptotic responses in these cells (6
, 7) . So that RAR and RXR function can be understood in greater detail, a panel of F9 cell lines that are null for the expression of RAR
, RAR
, RXR
, and pairwise combinations of RAR
-RXR
and RAR
-RXR
by homologous recombination-mediated gene targeting has been generated (7, 8, 9, 10)
. The F9 cell receptor KO cell lines (F9 KO) have allowed a more precise determination of the degree of functional redundancy between RARs/RXRs and have demonstrated a differential requirement for RARs and RXRs in mediating retinoid-induced cell death (7)
. Another important finding from the F9 KO studies was that the loss of pairs of receptors (A
/X
-/- and A
/X
-/- lines) resulted in a more severe impairment of retinoid response than for any of the single KOs (10
, 11)
. Cells lacking expression of the most abundant RAR (RAR
) and the most abundant RXR (RXR
) in F9 cells resulted in the complete loss of measurable retinoid response (10
, 11)
. In addition to ATRA and 9C-RA, there are numerous other naturally occurring and synthetic retinoids that can bind and activate retinoid receptors. Several recent reports suggest that some of these retinoids may act through receptor-independent mechanisms (12)
. One synthetic retinoid, 4HPR, inhibited carcinogenesis in animal models for various epithelial cancers and exhibited some activity in preneoplastic oral leukoplakia patients and in patients at risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer (13)
. Several clinical chemoprevention trials targeting breast, prostate, cervix, skin, lung, ovary, and bladder are ongoing (4)
. Like other retinoids, 4HPR can up-regulate the expression of RARß (14)
and activate transcription of retinoic acid response elements by RARs (15
, 16)
. Also, RARß expression was associated with the antiproliferative action of 4HPR in ovarian cancer cells (17)
. However, the ability of 4HPR to induce apoptosis in cells that are resistant to ATRA suggests that this activity may not involve retinoid receptors in some cell types (12
, 18, 19, 20)
. To directly test the hypothesis that 4HPR can act through a receptor-independent mechanism, we have measured its activity on the F9 KO cell lines that are WT, RAR
null (RAR
-/-), and RXR
null (RXR
-/-) and, particularly, on the cells essentially lacking retinoid receptor function (A
/X
-/-). The A
/X
-/- cells also exhibit a greatly reduced up-regulation of RARß expression upon ATRA treatment compared to WT cells (10)
and should, therefore, allow determination of any strict requirement for RARß action in the antiproliferative and/or apoptotic effects of retinoids.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(RAR
-/-), RXR
(RXR
-/-), or both RAR
and RXR
(A
/X
-/-) proteins were cultured and induced to differentiate into primitive endoderm, as described previously (7
, 8)
. ATRA and 4HPR were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Stocks were made in ethanol to a concentration of 1 mM and diluted to the appropriate final concentrations in culture medium. Cells were photographed using a phase contrast microscope at a magnification of x200.
Cell Viability Assay.
A calcein AM fluorescence-based cell viability assay (21)
was performed as follows. Cells were plated in triplicate in 96-well plates and treated with 10 µM ATRA or 4HPR at varying times. To detect the relative number of viable cells versus dead cells per well, we added the fluorescent dye calcein AM to the medium (1 µM), 1 h prior to the termination of the assay. The plates were fluorometrically analyzed using a Cytofluor 2300 fluorescence plate reader (Millipore). The excitation and emission wavelengths for calcein AM were set at 485 nm and 530 nm, respectively. The intensity of fluorescence of enzymatically cleaved calcein AM was taken as a positive measure of cell number.
Apoptosis/Cell Death Assays.
The occurrence of apoptosis and necrosis was visualized using a modified PI-Hoechst 33258 double staining assay (22)
. Cells were plated at a density of 4 x 105 cells per 10-cm dish containing glass coverslips coated with CellTak (Collaborative Biomedical Products) and allowed to attach overnight, before treatment with 10 µM 4HPR for 24 h. PI was added to the growth medium to a final concentration of 20 µg/ml, 1 h prior to the end of the assay. The coverslips were placed in six-well plates containing fresh growth medium containing 5 µg/ml Hoechst 33258 dye. Coverslips were incubated at 37°C for 15 min, medium was aspirated, and the slips were fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature. After a brief period of drying, the coverslips were mounted on slides using ProLong mounting medium (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). The cells remaining in the six-well plates were trypsinized and combined with the culture supernatant, followed by resuspension in growth medium containing 5 µg/ml Hoechst 33258 dye and incubation at 37°C for 15 min. The cells were then spun and resuspended in 1 ml of PBS. Approximately 3 x 104 cells were attached to slides using a Cytospin centrifuge (Shandon and Lipshaw Inc.) and observed visually for quantitation of apoptosis and necrosis. Apoptotic cells were scored as those that exhibited the DNA condensation characteristic of apoptosing cells, visible upon Hoechst 33258 staining, but did not stain intensely with PI. Necrotic cells were scored as those staining substantially above background levels with PI. The percentage of apoptotic and necrotic cells was calculated for at least 150 cells per sample, in three or more separate fields. The cells remaining on coverslips were photographed on a fluorescence microscope sequentially using filters for both Hoechst 33258 dye and PI, at a magnification of x400.
RT-PCR.
RNA preparation, RT-PCR, and Southern blotting were performed as described previously (7)
. The PCR primers and probes for collagen IV
1, laminin B1, and 36B4 were described previously (7)
.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, RXR
, or both proteins. These cells were treated with 10 µM 4HPR for 24 and 48 h, and cell viability was measured using the calcein AM fluorescence-based viability assay (21)
. All three receptor-null cell lines exhibited a reduction in cell viability similar to the parental F9 WT cell line (Fig. 1A)
|
but not RAR
(7)
. To determine whether 4HPR-induced cell death involves apoptosis and/or necrosis, we conducted a dual-stain procedure with the fluorescent DNA-binding dyes Hoechst 33258 and PI, which are membrane permeable and impermeable, respectively. Cells undergoing apoptosis exhibit a distinct morphology, characterized by condensation and fragmentation of nuclear DNA, which can be readily detected by intense staining with Hoechst 33258. Treatment of both WT and A
/X
-/- cells with 10 µM 4HPR resulted in the appearance of apoptosing cells (Fig. 2A
/X
-/- cells undergo necrosis upon 4HPR treatment (Fig. 2A
|
or RXR
, we made an attempt to quantitate apoptotic and necrotic cells by visual inspection of the Hoechst 33258-/PI-stained slides. There was an
3-fold higher percentage of apoptosing cells for the RAR
-/- cultures, compared to the other cell lines (WT, RXR
-/-, and A
/X
-/-) after 24 h of treatment with 10 µM 4HPR (Fig. 2B)
-/- cells could be due to clonal variation in sensitivity to 4HPR, which is unrelated to receptor status. Further analysis of multiple, independently generated RAR
-/- clones would be necessary to verify whether RAR
loss is related to a higher apoptosis rate.
4HPR Induces Differentiation of WT but not A
/X
-/- Cells.
Because there is evidence in several systems that 4HPR can act in a receptor-dependent manner (14, 15, 16, 17)
, we attempted to determine whether 4HPR treatment caused any measurable effects on the WT cells that differed from effects on the receptor-null cell lines. Different 4HPR effects in WT cells would likely be due to the presence of retinoid receptors. Several cultures each of WT and receptor-null cells were maintained in the presence of 10 µM 4HPR for up to 3 weeks. A small percentage of cells of each type survived the early cell killing effects. However, only the WT cells (but not the receptor-null cells) had a differentiated morphology resembling ATRA-treated WT cells (data not shown). To better determine whether there may be a receptor-dependent induction of differentiation by 4HPR, we treated cells with 1 µM 4HPR, which does not result in appreciable apoptosis or necrosis (data not shown), to allow the observation and analysis of a sufficient number of cells. 4HPR induced a morphological differentiation of WT cells, but not A
/X
-/- cells, which was similar to PrE induction by ATRA (Fig. 3A)
. RT-PCR was then used to determine the expression of two established markers of PrE differentiation, laminin B1 and type IV collagen, to further confirm PrE differentiation by 4HPR. Treatment of the WT cells but not the A
/X
-/- cells for 4 days with either 1 µM ATRA or 1 µM 4HPR resulted in a similar induction of both markers (Fig. 3B)
.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/X
-/- cells, i.e., likely in a receptor-dependent manner, is in agreement with the former study data. It should be noted that reexpression of RAR
in the RAR
-/- cells (24)
and RXR
in the RXR
-/- cells4
results in complete restoration of ATRA response, including the up-regulation of differentiation markers. This indicates that the absence of ATRA-induced differentiation in the receptor-null cells is truly the result of receptor loss and that the absence of 4HPR-induced differentiation in these same cells is highly likely to also be the result of receptor loss. Therefore, 4HPR may be acting both through a receptor-independent mechanism, for the initial cell killing events, and through the RARs/RXRs, for the later differentiation events. Fig. 4
|
A third explanation for the differentiating effect of 4HPR suggests that it is converted in some way to a retinoid, which can act through the retinoid receptors. For cells exposed to 10 µM 4HPR for several days, the cleavage of the hydroxyphenyl moiety from the alkyl chain, even if it is inefficient, could lead to generation of sufficient quantities of ATRA or some other retinoid metabolite to induce PrE differentiation. Although there is no direct evidence for such a conversion in F9 cells, our findings are consistent with this interpretation. Further studies are required to determine which of the three explanations for the differentiating activity of 4HPR are true in F9 cells.
As for the mechanism of 4HPR cytotoxicity, much less is known. One promising area of study links this effect to the induction of ROS. It was shown that induction of apoptosis by 4HPR coincided with ROS production in C33A cervical carcinoma cells and that both ROS and apoptosis production could be inhibited by pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate, an oxygen radical scavenger (28) . However, appreciable ROS production was not observed in this study in 4HPR-treated F9 cells, using the same assay methods as used for the C33A cells (data not shown). It appears likely that a different mechanism is involved in this case. Another potential mechanism of 4HPR cytotoxicity comes from a study using PC3 prostate cancer cells, in which a rapid induction of TGF-ß1 by 4HPR coincided with apoptosis induction (29) . It is not known whether the induction of TGF-ß1 by 4HPR is dependent on the retinoid receptors in that system. Although TGF-ß1 is not expressed at high levels in F9 cells, there is a receptor-dependent induction of TGF-ß2 by ATRA in these cells (7) . Current experiments are aimed at determining whether 4HPR can regulate TGF-ß2 expression in the F9 cells and whether this regulation requires the presence of retinoid receptors.
4HPR is less toxic than other retinoids and shows great promise as a cancer-chemopreventive drug (2 , 27) . It is currently being tested in a number of chemoprevention trials for breast, prostate, cervical, skin, ovary, and lung cancer as well as transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder (2) . Although the current study was conducted with an in vitro system, we would propose that the cancer therapeutic and chemopreventive efficacy of 4HPR in cancer patients might be due to its dual role as both a chemotoxic agent (receptor independent) and as a retinoid, differentiating agent (receptor dependent). Tumor cells that can escape cytotoxic effects at initial stages of exposure to high doses of 4HPR would then be susceptible to differentiating effects of lower doses of 4HPR. Such cells would be analogous to the 4HPR-resistant F9 cells that we observed after 3 weeks of treatment with 10 µM 4HPR (data not shown). As noted above, only the WT surviving cells exhibited a differentiated morphology, whereas the receptor-deficient cells grew in a manner similar to undifferentiated F9 cell colonies. Because the WT surviving cells were terminally differentiated, they ceased to proliferate and could not be subcloned for further study. However, the 4HPR-resistant, receptor-deficient cells, because they did not differentiate in the presence of 4HPR, continued to grow in colonies and could be propagated. These cells, along with their 4HPR-sensitive parental cell lines, will provide a unique model for the study of the specifically receptor-dependent and -independent effects of 4HPR.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported in part by National Cancer Institute Core Grants CA 16672 and CA 77150-01. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Box 236, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: (713) 792-0626; Fax: (713) 792-0628; E-mail: reksohad{at}ix.netcom.com ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: RAR, retinoic acid receptor; RXR, retinoid X receptor; ATRA, all-trans-retinoic acid; 9C-RA, 9-cis-retinoic acid; KO, knockout; 4HPR, N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide; WT, wild type; PI, propidium iodide; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-PCR; PrE, primitive endodermal; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TGF-ß, transforming growth factor ß. ![]()
4 J. L. Clifford, D. Metzger, H. Chiba, and P. Chambon, unpublished observations. ![]()
5 J. L. Clifford, unpublished observations. ![]()
Received 8/28/98. Accepted 11/13/98.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-null F9 embryonal carcinoma cells are resistant to the differentiation, antiproliferative and apoptotic effects of retinoids. EMBO J., 15: 4142-4155, 1996.[Medline]
function by gene disruption results in aberrant Hoxa-1 expression and differentiation upon retinoic acid treatment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90: 9601-9605, 1993.
(RAR
) and RAR
results in receptor-specific alterations in retinoic acid-mediated differentiation and retinoic acid metabolism. Mol. Cell. Biol., 15: 843-851, 1995.[Abstract]
or overexpression of RAR
or RARß in RAR
-null F9 cells reveals a partial functional redundancy between the three RAR types. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92: 7854-7858, 1995.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Zappala, C. Elbi, J. Edwards, J. Gorenstein, M. M. Rechler, and N. Bhattacharyya Induction of Apoptosis in Human Prostate Cancer Cells by Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-3 Does Not Require Binding to Retinoid X Receptor-{alpha} Endocrinology, April 1, 2008; 149(4): 1802 - 1812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Sabichi, S. P. Lerner, E. N. Atkinson, H. B. Grossman, N. P. Caraway, C. P. Dinney, D. F. Penson, S. Matin, A. Kamat, L. L. Pisters, et al. Phase III Prevention Trial of Fenretinide in Patients with Resected Non Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 224 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Kraveka, L. Li, Z. M. Szulc, J. Bielawski, B. Ogretmen, Y. A. Hannun, L. M. Obeid, and A. Bielawska Involvement of Dihydroceramide Desaturase in Cell Cycle Progression in Human Neuroblastoma Cells J. Biol. Chem., June 8, 2007; 282(23): 16718 - 16728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Colombo, F. Formelli, M. G. Cantu, G. Parma, M. Gasco, A. Argusti, A. Santinelli, R. Montironi, E. Cavadini, L. Baglietto, et al. A Phase I-II Preoperative Biomarker Trial of Fenretinide in Ascitic Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2006; 15(10): 1914 - 1919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tiwari, A. Kumar, R. A. Sinha, A. Shrivastava, A. K. Balapure, R. Sharma, V. K. Bajpai, K. Mitra, S. Babu, and M. M. Godbole Mechanism of 4-HPR-induced apoptosis in glioma cells: evidences suggesting role of mitochondrial-mediated pathway and endoplasmic reticulum stress Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2006; 27(10): 2047 - 2058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Lippman, J. J. Lee, J. W. Martin, A. K. El-Naggar, X. Xu, D. M. Shin, M. Thomas, L. Mao, H. A. Fritsche Jr., X. Zhou, et al. Fenretinide Activity in Retinoid-Resistant Oral Leukoplakia. Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2006; 12(10): 3109 - 3114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Villani, V. Appierto, E. Cavadini, A. Bettiga, A. Prinetti, M. Clagett-Dame, R. W. Curley, and F. Formelli 4-Oxo-Fenretinide, a Recently Identified Fenretinide Metabolite, Induces Marked G2-M Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis in Fenretinide-Sensitive and Fenretinide-Resistant Cell Lines. Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 66(6): 3238 - 3247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Xu, S. Cheepala, E. McCauley, K. Coombes, L. Xiao, S. M. Fischer, and J. L. Clifford Chemoprevention of Skin Carcinogenesis by Phenylretinamides: Retinoid Receptor-Independent Tumor Suppression Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 12(3): 969 - 979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Serrano, L. Baglietto, H. Johansson, F. Mariette, R. Torrisi, M. Onetto, M. Paganuzzi, and A. Decensi Effect of the Synthetic Retinoid Fenretinide on Circulating Free Prostate-Specific Antigen, Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I, and Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-3 Levels in Men with Superficial Bladder Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 11(5): 2083 - 2088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Peng, T. Maruo, Y. Cao, V. Punj, R. Mehta, T. K. Das Gupta, and K. Christov A Novel RAR{beta} Isoform Directed by a Distinct Promoter P3 and Mediated by Retinoic Acid in Breast Cancer Cells Cancer Res., December 15, 2004; 64(24): 8911 - 8918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Georgakilas, P. V. Bennett, D. M. Wilson III, and B. M. Sutherland Processing of bistranded abasic DNA clusters in {gamma}-irradiated human hematopoietic cells Nucleic Acids Res., October 19, 2004; 32(18): 5609 - 5620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-J. Kim and R. Lotan Identification of Retinoid-Modulated Proteins in Squamous Carcinoma Cells Using High-Throughput Immunoblotting Cancer Res., April 1, 2004; 64(7): 2439 - 2448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Kalli, K. E. Devine, M. C. Cabot, C. R. Arnt, M. P. Heldebrant, P. A. Svingen, C. Erlichman, L. C. Hartmann, C. A. Conover, and S. H. Kaufmann Heterogeneous Role of Caspase-8 in Fenretinide-Induced Apoptosis in Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma Cell Lines Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2003; 64(6): 1434 - 1443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Sabichi, H. Xu, S. Fischer, C. Zou, X. Yang, V. E. Steele, G. J. Kelloff, R. Lotan, and J. L. Clifford Retinoid Receptor-Dependent and Independent Biological Activities of Novel Fenretinide Analogues and Metabolites Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2003; 9(12): 4606 - 4613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Matsushima-Nishiwaki, M. Okuno, Y. Takano, S. Kojima, S. L. Friedman, and H. Moriwaki Molecular mechanism for growth suppression of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells by acyclic retinoid Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2003; 24(8): 1353 - 1359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Sabichi, M. R. Modiano, J. J. Lee, Y.-M. Peng, M.-J. Xu, H. Villar, W. S. Dalton, and S. M. Lippman Breast Tissue Accumulation of Retinamides in a Randomized Short-term Study of Fenretinide Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2003; 9(7): 2400 - 2405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zou, A.-T. Vlastos, L. Yang, J. Wang, M. Brewer, and M. Follen Effect of 4-Hydroxyphenylretinamide on Human Cervical Epithelial and Cancer Cell Lines Reproductive Sciences, January 1, 2003; 10(1): 41 - 48. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-M. Simeone, S. Ekmekcioglu, L. D. Broemeling, E. A. Grimm, and A. M. Tari A Novel Mechanism by Which N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide Inhibits Breast Cancer Cell Growth: The Production of Nitric Oxide Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2002; 1(12): 1009 - 1017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Rizvi, J. L. Marshall, E. Ness, M. J. Hawkins, C. Kessler, H. Jacobs, W. D. Brenckman Jr, J. S. Lee, W. Petros, W. K. Hong, et al. Initial Clinical Trial of Oral TAC-101, a Novel Retinoic Acid Receptor-Alpha Selective Retinoid, in Patients With Advanced Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., August 15, 2002; 20(16): 3522 - 3532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Shin, B. S. Glisson, F. R. Khuri, J. L. Clifford, G. Clayman, S. E. Benner, A. A. Forastiere, L. Ginsberg, D. Liu, J. J. Lee, et al. Phase II and Biologic Study of Interferon Alfa, Retinoic Acid, and Cisplatin in Advanced Squamous Skin Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., January 15, 2002; 20(2): 364 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Vivat-Hannah, D. You, C. Rizzo, J.-P. Daris, P. Lapointe, F. C. Zusi, A. Marinier, M. V. Lorenzi, and M. M. Gottardis Synergistic Cytotoxicity Exhibited by Combination Treatment of Selective Retinoid Ligands with Taxol (Paclitaxel) Cancer Res., December 1, 2001; 61(24): 8703 - 8711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Smith and B. Anderson Where to Next with Retinoids for Cancer Therapy? Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2001; 7(10): 2955 - 2957. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-C. Soria, C. Moon, L. Wang, W. N. Hittelman, S. J. Jang, S.-Y. Sun, J. J. Lee, D. Liu, J. M. Kurie, R. C. Morice, et al. Effects of N-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)retinamide on hTERT Expression in the Bronchial Epithelium of Cigarette Smokers J Natl Cancer Inst, August 15, 2001; 93(16): 1257 - 1263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Shin, F. R. Khuri, B. Murphy, A. S. Garden, G. Clayman, M. Francisco, D. Liu, B. S. Glisson, L. Ginsberg, V. Papadimitrakopoulou, et al. Combined Interferon-Alfa, 13-cis-Retinoic Acid, and Alpha-Tocopherol in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Novel Bioadjuvant Phase II Trial J. Clin. Oncol., June 15, 2001; 19(12): 3010 - 3017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Lippman, J. J. Lee, D. D. Karp, E. E. Vokes, S. E. Benner, G. E. Goodman, F. R. Khuri, R. Marks, R. J. Winn, W. Fry, et al. Randomized Phase III Intergroup Trial of Isotretinoin to Prevent Second Primary Tumors in Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, April 18, 2001; 93(8): 605 - 618. [Abstract] |