| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Advances in Brief |
Immunotherapy Research Group, Department of Urology, Medical University of Lübeck, D-23538 Lübeck; and Department of Immunology and Cell Biology, Borstel Research Center, D-23845 Borstel, Germany
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
25% of the animals (8, 9, 10, 11)
. Low tumor take rates impair the evaluation of experimental results and lead to higher numbers of animals in the experimental groups. To solve this problem, we developed a modification of the tumor implantation technique. We hypothesized that a short retention time of instilled cells was a reason for unreliable tumor implantation and tried to increase tumor take rates by prolonging dwell time. Because the orthotopic model is frequently used in the evaluation of intravesical immunotherapy, we confirmed the sensitivity of the modified model to topical BCG3
immunotherapy using an unusually high tumor load. | Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
17 g, were purchased from Charles River (Sulzfeld, Germany) and maintained at our animal care facility for 1 week prior to use. The mice were housed five per cage in a limited access area at a room temperature of 20 ± 1°C and a humidity of 50 ± 10%, with food and water ad libitum. All experiments were approved by the Ministry of Environment, Nature and Forestry of Schleswig-Holstein, Germany.
Tumor.
Tumor cells used in this study were derived from the 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene-induced murine bladder cancer MB49 (12)
. The cells were maintained in in vitro culture (DMEM, 10% FCS, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37°C and 5% CO2). Tumor cells were harvested by trypsinization and suspended in DMEM without L-glutamine, FCS, and antibiotics. Viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion, and only tumor cell suspensions with >90% viable cells were used for tumor implantation. The concentrations of the tumor cell suspensions that we used for implantation were adjusted to 106, 4 x 105, and 2 x 105 cells/ml for groups I, II, and III (see below), respectively, in the first experiment and to 2 x 106 cells/ml in the second set of experiments.
Tumor Implantation.
Intravesical tumor implantation was performed according to a modification of the methods described by Soloway and Masters (8
, 13)
and Shapiro et al. (14)
for the MBT-2 model and by Hudson et al. (7)
for the MB49 model. Briefly, after a short ether inhalation anesthesia, the mice received an i.p. injection of diluted sodium pentobarbital (6 mg/ml) for general anesthesia of a single dose of 0.06 mg/g body weight. After shaving areas of
1 cm2 on the backs of the mice, we inserted a 24-gauge Teflon i.v. catheter (Insyte-W; Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) transurethrally into the bladder using a lubricant (Instilla Gel; Farco-Pharma, Köln, Germany). Mice were placed with their backs on the ground plate of the cautery unit. To optimize contact, we used electrocardiogram electrode contact gel. The soft-tipped end of a spring-wire guide of a 24-gauge central venous catheter (Arrow, Erding, Germany) was inserted into the bladder via the Teflon catheter and gently pushed forward until it reached the bladder wall. The guide wire was attached to the cautery unit (Elektrotom 500; Gebrüder Martin, Tuttlingen, Germany), and a monopolar coagulation was applied for 5 s at the lowest setting (5 W). After removal of the guide wire, 0.05 ml of the tumor cell suspension was instilled. Unlike the conventional procedure, in which catheters are removed after instillation, the catheters were pinched off with a clamp, kept locked with a Luer-Lock closing cone, and left in place until the mice awakened. Using this method, we ensured a dwell time of
3 h. In contrast to others (1
, 8
, 14)
, we used DMEM as solvent for instilled tumor cells as a means for improving viability.
Drugs.
For intravesical immunotherapy, lyophilized BCG strain Connaught strain was kindly provided by Cytochemia (Ihringen, Germany). Each vial contained 81 mg of lyophilized BCG Connaught with at least 1.8 x 108 colony-forming units. BCG was reconstituted with 3 ml of solvent, according to the manufacturers recommendation.
Optimization of Intravesical Tumor Implantation.
Thirty mice were assigned to three groups, and intravesical bladder tumors were implanted by intravesical instillation of MB49 tumor cells, according to the method described above. Group I mice received 10,000 cells, group II mice received 20,000 cells, and group III mice received 50,000 tumor cells. The animals received no further treatment and were sacrificed after 35 days.
Mice were visited daily to check their viability status and to examine for gross hematuria. Tumor incidence and bladder weights were determined after sacrifice. The presence of intravesical tumors was verified histologically (H&E staining). All animals underwent complete dissection so that manifestations of extravesical tumor growth and pulmonary metastasis could be recorded.
Sensitivity to Intravesical Immunotherapy.
Intravesical tumors were implanted into 30 mice using 100,000 tumor cells. The animals were randomized to two groups with 15 animals each: PBS control and BCG therapy. Intravesical instillations were performed on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 after tumor implantation by the technique described above. Considering the catheters death space, the instilled volume was 0.05 ml in both groups. The BCG dose of a single instillation was 1.35 mg (minimum of 3 x 106 colony-forming units). Due to rapid tumor growth, the animals were sacrificed on day 28 and evaluated in the same way as described for the first experiment.
Statistical Analysis.
To compare survival, we used the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Comparison of bladder weight and body weight was performed with the Mann-Whitney U test. Statistical significance was determined at P < 0.05. Results are given in boxplots, in which the upper and lower boundaries of the boxes represent the upper and lower quartiles, respectively. The box length represents the interquartile distance, so the box contains 50% of the values falling between the 25th and 75th percentile of a group. The black line inside the box identifies the group median, whereas the lines extending from each box extend to the smallest and largest observations in the groups. To compare tumor take rates, the
2 test was used. For statistical analysis we used SPSS for Microsoft Windows.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 test). One group II mouse and two group III mice showed pyelonephritis. Upper urinary tract tumor growth in the kidney could be demonstrated in one animal from group III.
Tumor Outgrowth.
All mice developed intravesical tumors, indicating a tumor take rate of 100%, independent of the number of instilled tumor cells.
Bladder Weight.
A correlation between number of instilled tumor cells and bladder weight was found. Mice receiving 50,000 MB49 cells had the highest average bladder weight (251.6 ± 39.0 mg), whereas mice instilled with 20,000 and 10,000 tumor cells had average bladder weights of 202 ± 54.2 and 172 ± 61.9 mg, respectively (P = 0.04 and 0.0039, respectively, Mann-Whitney U test; Fig. 1
).
|
|
General Findings.
Gross hematuria was demonstrable before day 8 in 90% of the animals. The average body weight of all mice increased from 17.6 g on day 1 up to 18.9 g on day 12, and a reduction of body weight was observed thereafter. No significant differences were seen between the PBS and BCG therapy groups.
We found pulmonary metastases in 66.6% of the mice receiving PBS and 53.3% of the mice treated with BCG (not significant,
2 test). Two mice of the PBS and one mouse of the BCG group had hydronephrosis due to extensive intravesical tumor growth. Two mice in each group suffered from suppurative pyelonephritis, which is most probably due to ascending urinary infection.
Tumor Outgrowth.
Mice receiving PBS instillations had a tumor take rate of 100%, whereas the animals treated with BCG had tumor outgrowth in 93.3% (not significant,
2 test).
Effect of BCG Instillations on Average Bladder Weight.
The animals of the control group receiving PBS instillations had an average bladder weight of 248 mg. Weekly BCG instillations reduced average bladder weight to 140 mg (P = 0.0009, Mann-Whitney U test; Fig. 3
).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
70%, even after instillation of 5 x 105 MBT-2 cells (9, 10, 11)
. Such low tumor take rates can compromise the evaluation of experimental results and may increase the number of animals needed for investigation. Successful tumor implantation is also dependent on adequate traumatization of bladder surface. Instillation of tumor cells in a nontraumatized bladder induces intravesical tumor growth in <10% of the instilled animals (17) . Traumatization of the bladder surface is usually performed with electrocautery after catheterization and transurethral insertion of the cautery wire (7 , 10 , 15) . Traumatization is also achieved by instillations of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (8) or hydrochloric acid (18) .
Tumor outgrowth, detected by abdominal palpation, tumor take rate, and bladder weight, are the most common used response variables in this tumor model (7 , 10 , 15) . We do not consider mere bladder palpation and tumor take rate to be reliable parameters for assessing treatment effects on tumor growth. Only large tumors (>200 mg) were clearly detectable by abdominal palpation. Using the tumor take as a response variable may give inadequate results because a reduced take rate in one group may be the result of successful treatment or may simply reflect failure of tumor implantation. To overcome these difficulties, other authors tried to monitor intravesical tumor growth and treatment effects by imaging methods like transrectal ultrasound (16) or magnetic resonance (18 , 19) . These methods proved to be a suitable means for monitoring intravesical tumor growth, but each imaging procedure required anesthesia and catheterization. Almost 20% of the animals died prior to the completion of the treatment protocol due to procedural mishaps (18 , 19) . Apart from this, imaging methods, especially magnetic resonance imaging, are expensive. Recently a new, invasive technique of intravesical tumor implantation was described, which uses direct submucosal injection of tumor cells after exposing the bladder by a low midline incision. This technique enables tumor take rates of 100% but requires an open surgical procedure and postoperative antibiotic treatment (20) . The use of antibiotics might further impair the efficacy of immunotherapies such as BCG.
In our study, we used a different approach and tried to achieve a maximum tumor take rate by a simple modification of the "traditional" procedure. We hypothesized that a prolonged contact time of instilled tumor cells and bladder wall may increase tumor take. This was achieved by leaving locked catheters in the animals bladder until the animal awakened. Efflux of tumor cells or premature bladder evacuation by voiding could be prevented for
3 h. We evaluated the response variables survival and bladder weight determined after dissection to describe the treatment effects on existing intravesical tumors.
In our first set of experiments, we investigated whether tumor take was dependent on number of instilled cells or on dwell time. Instillation of 50,000, 20,000, and 10,000 tumor cells each led to tumor take rates of 100%, showing clearly that dwell time was the relevant variable for successful tumor take. On the other hand, the course of the malignant disease was significantly influenced by the number of instilled cells because survival, bladder weight, and rate of pulmonary metastasis were dependent on the number of instilled tumor cells. This opens the possibility of "tailoring" the model to the requirements of different therapeutic approaches. The time slot for therapeutic intervention and the aggressiveness of the disease might be influenced by instillation of different number of tumor cells.
The efficacy of intravesical BCG in murine bladder cancer has been demonstrated in several investigations (8 , 10 , 11) . To confirm that our modified tumor model is still sensitive to BCG, we performed a further set of experiments, using a very high number of tumor cells for instillation. We confirmed the sensitivity of the modified model to intravesical BCG immunotherapy using average bladder weight and survival as response variables. As expected, we saw a rapid progression of tumor growth, indicated by early onset of gross hematuria and early begin of weight loss and death of >85% of the animals of the control group within the observation period. Even with this aggressive course of disease, BCG immunotherapy significantly reduced average bladder weights and could prolong survival as compared to control. Therefore, with these experimental settings, BCG therapy clearly interferes with survival and bladder weight but not with tumor implantation. Our modification is easy to handle and does not need imaging methods or open surgical tumor implantation. Furthermore, the response variables survival and bladder weight are easily determined. Finally, reliably inducing tumor take rates of 100% certainly contributes to a significant reduction in the number of animals per group needed for statistical reliability.
We conclude that our modification is a simple, cheap, and useful method to improve the orthotopic murine bladder cancer model.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grant SFB 367, project C7-Böhle). ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Immunotherapy Research Group, Department of Urology, Medical University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany. Phone: 49 451 5006112; Fax: 49 451 5006112. ![]()
3 The abbreviation used is: BCG, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin. ![]()
Received 3/ 1/99. Accepted 4/28/99.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Pfost, C. Seidl, M. Autenrieth, D. Saur, F. Bruchertseifer, A. Morgenstern, M. Schwaiger, and R. Senekowitsch-Schmidtke Intravesical {alpha}-Radioimmunotherapy with 213Bi-Anti-EGFR-mAb Defeats Human Bladder Carcinoma in Xenografted Nude Mice J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2009; 50(10): 1700 - 1708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Zaharoff, B. S. Hoffman, H. B. Hooper, C. J. Benjamin Jr., K. K. Khurana, K. W. Hance, C. J. Rogers, P. A. Pinto, J. Schlom, and J. W. Greiner Intravesical Immunotherapy of Superficial Bladder Cancer with Chitosan/Interleukin-12 Cancer Res., August 1, 2009; 69(15): 6192 - 6199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. BLIETZ, B. THODE, M. HAUSES, R. PRIES, A. J. MEYER, C. DOEHN, D. JOCHAM, and I. KAUSCH In Vivo Studies on the Availability and Toxicity of Antisense Oligonucleotides in Bladder Cancer In Vivo, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 13 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Suttmann, J. Riemensberger, G. Bentien, D. Schmaltz, M. Stockle, D. Jocham, A. Bohle, and S. Brandau Neutrophil Granulocytes Are Required for Effective Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Immunotherapy of Bladder Cancer and Orchestrate Local Immune Responses Cancer Res., August 15, 2006; 66(16): 8250 - 8257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.A. Crallan, N.T. Georgopoulos, and J. Southgate Experimental models of human bladder carcinogenesis Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2006; 27(3): 374 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Wu, K. Esuvaranathan, and R. Mahendran Monitoring the Response of Orthotopic Bladder Tumors to Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Therapy Using the Prostate-Specific Antigen Gene as a Reporter Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2004; 10(20): 6977 - 6984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Wu, R. Mahendran, and K. Esuvaranathan Nonviral Cytokine Gene Therapy on an Orthotopic Bladder Cancer Model Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2003; 9(12): 4522 - 4528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |