Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 59, 3340-3345, July 1, 1999]
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eggert, A. A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Adema, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eggert, A. A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Adema, G. J.
[Cancer Research 59, 3340-3345, July 15, 1999]
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research


Advances in Brief

Biodistribution and Vaccine Efficiency of Murine Dendritic Cells Are Dependent on the Route of Administration1

Andreas A. O. Eggert, Marco W. J. Schreurs, Otto C. Boerman, Wim J. C. Oyen, Annemiek J. de Boer, Cornelis J. A. Punt, Carl G. Figdor and Gosse J. Adema2

Tumor Immunology Laboratory [A. A. O. E., M. W. J. S., A. J. d. B., C. G. F., G. J. A.] and Departments of Nuclear Medicine [O. C. B., W. J. C. O.] and Medical Oncology [C. J. A. P.], University Hospital Nijmegen St. Radboud, 6525 EX Nijmegen, the Netherlands


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Dendritic cells (DCs) are professional antigen-presenting cells, well equipped to initiate an immune response. Currently, tumor antigen-derived peptide loaded DCs are used in clinical vaccination in cancer patients. However, the optimal dose and route of administration of a DC vaccine still remain to be determined. Using indium-111-labeled DCs, we investigated whether the route of administration does affect the biodistribution of DCs in lymphoid organs and whether it influences the outcome of DC vaccination in the B16 mouse melanoma tumor model. The results demonstrate that i.v. injected DCs mainly accumulate in the spleen, whereas s.c. injected DCs preferentially home to the T-cell areas of the draining lymph nodes. Using tyrosinase-related protein-2-derived peptide-loaded DC vaccination in a fully autologous B16 melanoma tumor model, we observed a delay in tumor growth, improved survival as well as increased antitumor cytotoxic T-cell reactivity after s.c. vaccination as compared to i.v. vaccination. These data demonstrate that optimal induction of antitumor reactivity against the autologous melanocyte differentiation antigen tyrosinase-related protein-2-derived peptitde occurs after s.c. vaccination and correlates with the preferential accumulation of DCs in the T-cell areas of lymph nodes.


    Introduction
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
DCs3 constitute a family of APCs defined by their morphology and their unique capacity to initiate a primary immune response (1 , 2) . They originate from bone marrow and are present as immature APCs in nonlymphoid tissues. On activation by antigenic challenge and/or inflammation, the DCs mature and migrate to the secondary lymphoid tissues where they present the processed antigen to T cells. There they interact with T cells and present the processed antigen in MHC molecules (3) . Because of these properties, mature DCs are thought to be ideal for generating a primary immune response against cancer, viral infections, and other diseases. In recent years, techniques have been developed to generate large numbers of functionally potent DCs by culturing bone marrow (4 , 5) or peripheral blood monocytes in the presence of GM-CSF and/or other cytokines, such as IL-4 (6) , tumor necrosis factor, stem cell factor, and FLT3 ligand (7 , 2) . The availability of class I-restricted peptides derived from tumor-associated antigens, such as tyrosinase, TRPs, gp100, and MART-1/Melan-A offered the possibility to use the DCs as APCs to generate tumor-reactive CTLs in vitro (8) . Similarly, DCs are now also used in vivo in antimelanoma vaccinations (9) . In the murine B16 melanoma, the homologous of the melanocyte differentiation antigens are identified and can now be used to investigate DC vaccination strategies in more detail (10 , 11) . In these DC vaccination models, one of the crucial functions of the DCs is their ability to migrate specifically into T-cell areas of secondary lymphoid organs. Herein, we compared the biodistribution of 111In-labeled DCs after different routes of administration in time. Besides major differences in biodistribution, we also provide evidence that the efficiency of DC vaccination is dependent on the route of DC administration. The implications of these findings for DC vaccination will be discussed.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Mice.
Male C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice were purchased from Charles River Wiga (Sulzfeld, Germany) and held under specified pathogen-free conditions in the Central Animal Laboratory, Nijmegen University (Nijmegen, the Netherlands). For experimental purposes, mice 6–8 weeks of age were used.

Reagents.
Cells are cultured in Iscove’s modified DMEM with glutamax supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS (Life Technologies, Inc., Breda, the Netherlands), 50 ßM ß-mercaptoethanol, antibiotics, and antimycotics (Life Technologies, Inc.), unless mentioned otherwise. Murine recombinant GM-CSF (rmGM-CSF) and murine recombinant IL-4 (rmIL-4) were kindly provided by Dr. G. Zurawski (DNAX Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA). The following monoclonal antibodies were used: CD45R/B220 (RA3–6B2), CD4 (MT-4), CD8 (LYT-2), I-Ab (17/227), and the activating anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody FGK-45 (kindly provided by Dr. Rolink, Basel Institute for Immunology, Basel, Switzerland; Ref. 12 ). The mTRP2 (VYDFFVWL) peptide and irrelevant peptide OVA (SIINFEKL) were synthesized with a free COOH terminus by F-moc peptide chemistry using ABIMED Multiple Synthesizer or by T-boc chemistry on a Biosearch SAM2 peptide synthesizer. The peptides were >90% pure, as indicated by high-performance liquid chromatography. Peptides were dissolved in DMSO and stored at - 20°C.

DC Culture.
DCs were generated according to Inaba et al. (4) , with modifications. Briefly, femurs were dissected, placed in 70% alcohol for 1 min, and washed with PBS. Marrow was flushed and passed through nylon mesh to remove debris. After washing, lymphocytes, granulocytes, and I-A-positive cells were removed by immunomagnetic depletion against the CD45R, CD4, CD8, and I-A-antigens. Remaining cells were cultured overnight, and the nonadherent cells were seeded at 2 x 105 cells/ml and 4 ml/well in the presence of 20 ng/ml rmGM-CSF and rmIL-4 in 6-well plates (Costar, Badhoevedorp, the Netherlands). On day 4, the cultures were refreshed by adding 1 ml of culture medium supplemented with GM-CSF and IL-4 (10 ng/ml). At day 7, nonadherent and loosely adherent proliferating DC aggregates were collected and replated in fresh medium, cytokines (1 x 106 cells/ml), and 500 ßl of hybridoma supernatant of activating anti-CD40 antibody FGK 45.

[111In]oxinate Labeling, Administration, Gamma Camera Imaging and Biodistribution Analysis.
Bone marrow DCs were labeled with [111In] oxinate (Mallinckrodt Medical, Petten, the Netherlands) in 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) for 20 min at room temperature. Cells were washed three times with PBS, and the labeling efficiency was calculated as the percentage of the activity that remained associated with the cell pellet. To determine the stability in vitro, DC samples were kept in medium without cytokines at 37°C. After different time periods, cells were spun down, the supernatant was transferred to other tubes, cell pellets were resuspended in the same volume, and the emitted radioactivity was counted in the gamma counter. The percentage of cell-associated radioactivity was calculated. For the in vivo studies, mice, five per experimental group, were given injections either s.c. (abdomen or thighs), i.p., or i.v. in the lateral tail vein with 1 x 106 DC (30–50 ßCi) in 200 ßl of PBS/mouse. At different time points, mice were anesthetized with oxygen/nitrous oxide/ethrane (ICI Farma, Rotterdam, The Netherlands), and images were recorded with a gamma camera (Siemens Orbiter; Siemens Inc., Hoffmann Estate, IL) equipped with parallel-hole medium-energy collimator. Images were obtained (minimum of 100.000 acquired counts) and were digitally stored in a 256 x 256 matrix. For tissue biodistribution, groups of five mice were analyzed at different time points after injection of the 111In-labeled DCs. Blood samples, lungs, liver, kidneys, spleen, thymus, small intestine, mediastinal tissue, and lymph nodes (brachial, lumbal, inguinal, popliteal, and mesenterial) were collected, weighed, and counted in the gamma counter. To correct for radioactivity decay, injection standards were counted simultaneously. The measured activity in tissues and samples was expressed as the percentage of ID or as percentage of ID/0.1 gram tissue (%ID/0.1 g). All values are expressed as mean ± SE.

Microscopic Autoradiography.
Lymphoid organs were dissected 24 h after i.v. and s.c. injection of living or gluteraldehyde-fixed (0.1%; 10 min at room temperature) [111In]oxinate-labeled DCs (250–300 ß Ci/1 x 106 DC), fixed in Unifix and embedded in paraffin. Deparaffinized sections were dipped in LM1 photographic emulsion (Amersham, Buck, United Kingdom) and exposed for 2–3 weeks at 4°C. After exposure, the sections were developed and poststained with hematoxylin. Parallel series of sections stained directly with H&E were included for better appreciation of morphology.

Vaccination with Peptide-pulsed DCs.
On days 8 or 9, DCs were harvested and loaded with 10–20 ßM peptide and 5 ßg/ml ß2microglobuline (Cymbus Biotechnology LTD, Canpro Scientific, Veenendaal, the Netherlands) in Optimem (Life Technologies, Inc.; 2–3 x 106cells/ml). After loading, DCs were washed in saline, and 3–4 x 105 DC/0.1 ml of saline were injected. Peptide-pulsed DCs were injected twice with a 2-week interval. Two weeks after the second vaccination, mice were challenged s.c. with 1 x 105 live B16 melanoma cells in 0.1 ml of saline in each flank. The size of growing tumors was measured every 2–3 days using microcalipers. The murine melanoma cell line B16 (subline F10) was grown as described by Fidler (13) . The murine thymoma cell line EL-4 (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) was cultured in Iscove’s medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 5% FCS and 50 ßl ß-mercaptoethanol.

CTL Culture and Chromium Release Assay.
After tumor challenge, spleens were isolated from tumor-bearing and protected mice, and 3 x 106 single-cell splenocytes were restimulated in an upright T25 flask (10 ml; Costar) with 1 x 106 irradiated (25 Gy) peptide-loaded lipopolysaccharide blasts [1 x 106/ml splenocytes cultured for 3 days in the presence of 25 ßg/ml lipopolysaccharide (Salmonella typhosa; Sigma) and 7 ßg/ml Dextran-sulfate in a T75-flask (Costar), and loaded with 100 ß M peptide + 5 ßg/ml human ß2m (Cymbus)]. Bulk CTLs were isolated after a 7-day restimulation by density gradient centrifugation (Lympholite-M; Cedarlane Laboratories, Sanbio, Uden, the Netherlands) and were used as effectors in a chromium release assay, performed as described previously (14) . When used in a chromium release assay, B16 tumor cells were pretreated with recombinant rat IFN-{gamma}, 50–100 units/ml, for 48 h.


    Results
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Bone Marrow-derived DCs can be Efficiently Labeled with [111In]oxinate.
To investigate the routing and tissue distribution of DCs in a vaccination setting, we generated mouse bone marrow-derived DCs using GM-CSF and IL-4 in vitro (4) and determined their labeling efficiency using different radionuclides. To obtain a homogeneous DC population with a mature phenotype, DCs were cultured for one additional day in the presence of an activating anti-CD40 antibody. Analysis of the nonadherent fraction demonstrates that >80% of the DCs now express the characteristic DC markers MHC class II and B7 at high levels. Because initial experiments indicated that the labeling efficiency of DCs with [111In]oxinate was far superior to 125I, we further optimized the DC labeling with [111In]oxinate and obtained a labeling efficiency of 85–90% (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 1ACitation , the percentage of cell-associated radioactivity is still >75% after 8 h, 50% after 20 h, and is decreased to 25% after 48 h. As shown in Fig. 1BCitation , the observed decrease in cell-associated radioactivity in time corresponds to the loss of viable DCs. This loss of viable cells is likely due to apoptosis of the mature DC in vitro and does not occur as a consequence of the 111In-labeling (Fig. 1B)Citation . These findings demonstrate that in vitro-generated bone marrow-derived DCs can be efficiently labeled with [111In]oxinate (85–90%), which is in line with the previous observation that freshly isolated spleen-derived DCs can be labeled with [111In] chloride (>65% efficiency; 15). The observation that the radioactivity stays associated with viable cells for up to 48 h allows usage of 111In-labeled DCs to study migration and homing in vivo.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. In vitro analysis of radiolabeled DCs. The percentage of cell-associated label (A) and the percentage of viable radiolabeled and unlabeled DCs (B) are indicated in time (hours).

 
Biodistribution of i.v.-injected 111In-labeled DCs.
As in most animal tumor models DCs are administered by i.v. injection (16 , 17 , 18) , we investigated the in vivo biodistribution of bone marrow-derived DCs after i.v. administration by measuring the radioactivity present in dissected organs (Fig. 2B-D)Citation , as well as by total body imaging in time (Fig. 2A)Citation .



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Biodistribution of i.v.-injected 111In-labeled DCs in time. The biodistribution in living animals as determined by gamma camera imaging (A) and in dissected organs (B-D) is shown at the time points indicated. The total amount of radioactivity in the dissected organs (B) is expressed as the percentage of the ID. The amount of radioactivity per dissected organ is indicated as percentage of the ID (C) and as the percentage of the ID per 0.1 gram of tissue (D). Each value represents mean (± SE) from five mice.

 
As shown by body imaging (Fig. 2A)Citation , i.v. injection of 111In-labeled DCs resulted in the immediate accumulation in capillary rich, well perfused organs like the liver, lung, spleen, and kidneys. As expected, a rapid decrease in the amount of radioactivity was observed in the lungs in time. After 48 h, most of the detectable dose was located in the liver, spleen, and kidneys, resulting in a "dome-shaped" area, as shown in Fig. 2ACitation . To determine the DC biodistribution more precisely, different organs (five mice/group) were dissected and the emitted radioactivity was measured at each time point. As shown in Fig. 2BCitation , 50–60% of the ID could be recovered from the dissected organs and is similar at each time point. The results further confirmed the bioimage data, revealing the decrease of radioactivity in the lungs and the accumulation in the liver, spleen, and kidneys (Fig. 2C)Citation . To correct for weight differences (liver, {approx} 1 g; popliteal lymph node, {approx} 0.001 g) and to visualize the accumulation of DCs in small organs, like lymph nodes, the obtained values were also adjusted to 0.1 g of tissue. As shown in Fig. 2DCitation , the highest amount of radioactivity relative to tissue weight is present in the spleen. However, still hardly any radioactivity is contained in the small lymph nodes. Collectively, the data indicate that 111In-labeled DCs are well suited to follow DC migration in vivo and that, after i.v. injection, DCs accumulate preferentially in the spleen, whereas the amount of radioactivity recovered from lymph nodes is very low, even 48 h after injection.

The Route of Administration Affects the Accumulation of DCs in T-cell Areas of Lymph Nodes.
Because of their capacity to induce immune responses, DCs loaded with tumor antigens are used to vaccinate against tumors in mice, as well as in man. However, it is not clear which route of administration of DCs is preferred. Therefore, we investigated the biodistribution of DCs in relation to the route of administration (e.g., i.v., s.c., and i.p. injection of 111In-labeled DCs). This analysis revealed (Fig. 3A)Citation , that the amount of radioactivity present in the lungs, spleen, and liver at 48 h after s.c. and i.p. injection was low in comparison to i.v. administration, whereas the amount of radioactivity present in kidneys seemed to be relatively independent of the route of administration and constant in time. The relatively low amount of radioactivity recovered from the dissected organs was due to the fact that a substantial amount of radioactivity (55– 35%) is contained at the injection site after i.p. and s.c. application. Analysis of the s.c. injection site by H&E staining and by autoradiography revealed that the radioactivity containing cells were located in the s.c. fat tissue and were >90% viable (Fig. 3FCitation and data not shown). However, in time, a marked accumulation of radioactivity (%ID) in the draining lymph nodes was observed after s.c. application (Fig. 3B)Citation , whereas intermediate amounts could be detected after i.p. application (Fig. 3B)Citation .



View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Biodistribution of i.v.-, i.p.-, and s.c.-injected 111In-labeled DCs in time. The biodistribution in dissected large (A) and small (B) organs at the times indicated are expressed as percentage of the ID and percentage of the ID per 0.1 gram of tissue, respectively. Each value represents mean (± SE) from five mice. C-F, ultrastructural localization of s.c-injected living (C) or gluteraldehyde-fixed (D) radiolabeled DCs in the draining lymph node 24 h after injection, as determined by autoradiography. E, H&E staining of a sequential section of the draining lymph node. F, a section of the s.c. injection site with the injected DC located in the s.c. fat tissue (top left). Magnification, x100.

 
To investigate the localization of the anti-CD40-activated 111In-labeled DCs after s.c. administration, the draining lymph nodes were removed 24 h after injection and analyzed by histology (Fig. 3E)Citation and autoradiography (Fig. 3, C and D)Citation . As shown in Fig. 3CCitation , the 111In-labeled DCs specifically home to the paracortical area of the lymph node. In contrast, s.c.-injected gluteraldehyde-fixed 111In-labeled DCs (Fig. 3D)Citation did not reach the T-cell areas, indicating that the observed migration into the T-cell areas (Fig. 3C)Citation is specific.

Collectively, these data demonstrate that in contrast to i.v.-injected DCs, s.c.-administrated DCs specifically accumulate in the draining lymph node and migrate into the T-cell area where they are known to interact with T cells to initiate an immune response.

s.c. DC Vaccination Leads to Improved Survival in the B16 Tumor Model.
It has been well established that i.v. administration of antigen-pulsed DCs can protect mice from a subsequent lethal challenge with relatively immunogenic tumors, like in the B16-OVA tumor model (19) . To study the effect of the route of DC administration in other models, we used the poorly immunogenic and fully autologous B16 tumor model and compared i.v. and s.c. vaccination with DCs loaded with the recently identified mouse melanocyte differentiation antigen TRP-2-derived T-cell epitope VYDFFVWL, which is endogenously presented by the B16 tumor cells (11) . As shown in Fig. 4, A and CCitation , after a lethal B16 tumor challenge, no difference was observed in tumor growth (Fig. 4A)Citation and survival (Fig. 4C)Citation between mice vaccinated via the i.v. route with DCs loaded with either the mTRP-2 peptide or an irrelevant peptide. However, after s.c. DC administration, a minor but reproducible delay in tumor outgrowth (Fig. 4B)Citation was observed. In the same experiment, one of four mice was protected against the B16 tumor challenge (Fig. 4D)Citation . In a total of three independent experiments, 5 of 15 mice remained tumor-free after s.c. DC vaccination for more than 50 days, whereas 0 of 10 mice survived after i.v. vaccination. Subsequent CTL analysis of i.v.-vaccinated tumor-bearing mice (Fig. 4E)Citation versus s.c.-vaccinated tumor-free mice (Fig. 4F)Citation further confirmed the presence of strong anti-TRP-2 CTL reactivity in s.c.-, but not i.v.-, vaccinated mice. Collectively, these data implicate that in the fully autologous B16/mTRP2 DC vaccination model, delivery of DCs via the s.c. route is preferred over i.v. administration and that the observed difference correlates with more efficient accumulation of DCs in lymph nodes as well as increased CTL reactivity in vitro after s.c. vaccination.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Tumor growth, survival, and CTL reactivity in i.v. DC- versus s.c. DC-vaccinated mice. DCs were pulsed either with mTRP-2 peptide (•) or with an irrelevant peptide ({circ}) and used to vaccinate mice either i.v. (A, C, and E) or s.c. (B, D, and F). After challenge with a lethal dose of B16 F10, the mean (± SE) tumor size (A and B) and survival (C and D) in time are indicated for a representative experiment with five mice/experimental group. Cytotoxicity of bulk CTLs, obtained after a single restimulation of splenocytes isolated from i.v.-vaccinated tumor-bearing mice (E) and s.c.-vaccinated tumor-free mice (F), against EL-4 target cells loaded with an irrelevant peptide ({circ}) or TRP-2 peptide(•) and B16 tumor cells ({blacksquare}). Specific lysis (%) at different E:T ratios performed in triplicate are depicted.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
DCs are professional APCs that are capable of initiating an immune response. The identification of tumor-derived antigens recognized by tumor-reactive CTLs (20 , 21) has opened the possibility to specifically target the immune system toward the tumor by vaccination approaches. One approach, which is currently applied in mouse model systems (22 , 18 , 19) as well as in man (23 , 24 , 9) , is vaccination with antigen-pulsed DCs. A number of murine tumor vaccination studies have shown that peptide-pulsed DCs induce tumor protection and, in some cases, even cure of established tumors (22) . However, crucial questions concerning the optimal dose, frequency, and route of administration of a DC vaccine are still unanswered. In this study, we have used 111In-labeled DCs to investigate the effect of the route of DC administration on DC biodistribution and their capacity to induce an antitumor immune response. After s.c. administration and, to a lesser extent, after i.p. injection, DCs preferentially accumulate in the T-cell areas of the draining lymph nodes. The finding that fixed DCs do not enter the T-cell areas indicates that the observed homing is specific. Moreover, a comparison between injection of 111In-labeled living and freeze/thawed DCs demonstrated that the radioactivity is cleared from the injection side twice as fast, but the amount present in the draining lymph node is <10% of that found with living cells. In contrast, i.v. injection of DCs merely leads to accumulation in the spleen, and only minor amounts of DCs can be detected in lymph nodes. Interestingly, we noted that after s.c. and i.p. application, a relatively large amount of DCs (55–35%) remained at the injection site. Microscopic analysis of the s.c. vaccination site indicated that the remaining DCs were viable. Similar observations have been reported recently in men using monocyte-derived 111In-labeled DCs (25) . Interestingly, in the latter report, most efficient loading of the draining lymph node was observed after intradermal injection, but also in this case 65–70% remained at the injection site. These findings are in contrast to the recent data obtained using a chimpanzee model in which GM-CSF/IL-4 generated monocyte-derived DCs labeled with a fluorescent dye rapidly leave the s.c. injection site and are virtually absent at 48 h after injection (26) . Possibly, this discrepancy could be explained by the origin of the DCs used (mouse bone marrow-derived versus chimpanzee monocyte-derived DCs), the difference in DC maturation stage, or the differences in the sensitivity of the detection methods used.

Because lymph nodes are believed to be the location where DCs encounter naive T cells to efficiently induce an immune response, we investigated whether the observed homing patterns do influence the outcome of vaccinations in the poorly immunogenic B16 mouse melanoma tumor model. Whereas all i.v.-vaccinated mice developed tumors at the same rate as control mice, a delay in tumor growth and an enhanced survival were observed in s.c.-vaccinated mice. Analysis of the CTL response in tumor-free, s.c.-vaccinated mice versus i.v.-vaccinated mice demonstrated a highly increased reactivity of anti-TRP-2 CTLs in s.c.-vaccinated mice. Therefore, these data suggest that the s.c. route of DC vaccination results in the induction of a more efficient antitumor immune response in the fully autologous B16 melanoma model.

We would like to note, however, that in more immunogenic tumor models, the i.v. route of DC administration can also result in tumor protection (19) . Similarly, we did not observe differences between s.c. and i.v. injection in the B16-OVA-model (data not shown). One major difference between the aforementioned model is usage of a highly immunogenic foreign antigen that is artificially expressed in the tumor cells versus the differentiation antigen TRP-2, which is endogenously expressed by melanocytes and the B16 tumor cells. In addition, the T-cell epitope derived from foreign antigens like OVA bind with high affinity to the presenting MHC class I molecule, whereas the self-mouse TRP-2-derived epitope has an intermediate to low affinity as has been observed previously for the peptide epitopes identified in human melanocyte differentiation antigens (11) . The difference between the models might be explained by the stability of the MHC-peptide complex in combination with the time required for the DCs to migrate to the lymph nodes. As s.c. vaccination leads to a rapid accumulation of DCs in the lymph nodes, the magnitude of the immune response induced by DCs carrying low-affinity binding peptides may be higher after s.c. vaccination, relative to i.v. vaccination. As peptide-pulsed DCs are currently used in clinical trials, it may be considered, especially in vaccination studies in which peptides with moderately MHC binding are used, to administer DC s.c. Alternatively, peptide-loaded DCs may be injected directly into the lymph node, which has been demonstrated to initiate a potent antimelanoma immune response (9) . Whether optimal vaccination with DCs expressing a tumor antigen for a longer period (e.g., after protein loading or transfection) is also critically dependent on the route of administration remains to be established.

In summary, our findings show that the distribution of DCs to lymphoid tissues is dependent on the route of vaccination. The efficiency of DCs administered s.c. to induce an immune response is higher when compared with i.v.-injected DCs in the autologous B16 model and correlates with the preferential accumulation of DCs in lymph nodes after s.c. injection. This tumor model, in combination with 111In-labeled DCs, will provide a valuable tool to further investigate the in vivo behavior of DCs in vaccination systems. It allows semiquantitative analysis of the amount of labeled cells that accumulate in tissues and to find ways to efficiently target DCs into secondary lymphoid tissues.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank G. Grutters (Central Animal Laboratory, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands) for technical assistance, C. Diepenbroek (Department of Pathology, University of Nijmegen) and M. G. Steffens (Department of Urology, University of Nijmegen) for technical assistance in the microscopic autoradiography studies, and Dr. G. Zurawski (DNAX, Palo Alto, CA) for kindly providing rm-GMCSF and rm-IL-4.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by the European Community, ERB FMRX CT960053. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Tumor Immunology, University Hospital Nijmegen St. Radboud, Philips van Leydenlaan 25, 6525 EX Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Phone: 31-24-3617600; Fax: 31-24-3540339; E-mail: g.adema{at}dent.kun.nl Back

3 The abbreviations used are: DC, dendritic cell; TRP, tyrosinase-related protein; p.i., postinjection; In, indium; APC, antigen-presenting cell; GM-CSF, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor; ID, injected dose; IL, interleukin. Back

Received 2/15/99. Accepted 6/ 1/99.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Steinman R. M. The dendritic cell system and its role in immunogenicity. Annu. Rev. Immunol., 9: 271-296, 1991.[Medline]
  2. Hart D. N. J. Dendritic cells: unique leukocyte populations which control the primary immune response. Blood, 90: 3245-3287, 1997.[Free Full Text]
  3. Inaba K., Metlay J. P., Crowely M. T., Steinman R. M. Dendritic cells pulsed with protein antigen in vitro can prime antigen-specific, MHC-restricted T cells in situ. J. Exp. Med., 172: 631-640, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Inaba K., Inaba M., Romani N., Aya H, Deguchi M., Ikehara S., Muramatsu S., Steinman R. M. Generation of large numbers of dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow cultures supplemented with granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J. Exp. Med., 176: 1693-1702, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Reid C. D., Stackpoole A., Meager A., Tikerpae J. Interactions of tumor necrosis factor with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and other cytokines in the regulation of dendritic cell growth in vitro from early bipotent CD34+ progenitors in human bone marrow. J. Immunol., 149: 2681-2688, 1992.[Abstract]
  6. Sallusto F., Lanzavecchia A. Efficient presentation of soluble antigen by cultured human dendritic cells is maintained by granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus interleukin4 and down-regulated by tumor necrosis factor {alpha}. J. Exp. Med., 179: 1109-1118, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Siena S., Di Nivola M., Bregni M., Motarini R., Anichini A., Lombardi L., Ravagnani F., Parmiani G., Gianni A. M. Massive ex vivo generation of functional dendritic cells from mobilized CD34+ blood progenitors for anticancer therapy. Exp. Hematol., 23: 1463-1471, 1995.[Medline]
  8. Bakker A. B. H., Marland G., de Boer A. J., Huijbens R. J., Danen E. H., Adema G. J., Figdor C. G. Generation of antimelanoma cytotoxic T lymphocytes from healthy donors after presentation of melanoma-associated antigen-derived epitopes by dendritic cells in vitro. Cancer Res., 55: 5330-5334, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Nestle F. O., Alijagic S., Gilliet M., Sun Y., Grabbe S., Dummer R., Burg G., Schadendorf D. Vaccination of melanoma patients with peptide- or tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cells. Nat. Med., 4: 328-332, 1998.[Medline]
  10. Schreurs M. W. J., de Boer A. J., Schmidt A., Figdor C. F., Adema G. J. Cloning, expression and tissue distribution of the murine homologue of the melanocyte lineage-specific antigen gp100. Melanoma Res., 7: 463-470, 1997.[Medline]
  11. Bloom M. B., Perry-Lalley D., Robbins P. F., Li Y., el-Gamil M., Rosenberg S. A., Yang J. C. Identification of tyrosinase-related protein 2 as a tumor rejection antigen for the B16 melanoma. J. Exp. Med., 185: 453-459, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Rolink A., Melchers F., Andersson J. The SCID but the RAG-2 gene product is required for Sß-S{epsilon} heavy chain class switching. Immunity, 5: 319-330, 1996.[Medline]
  13. Fidler I. J. Selection of successive tumor lines for metastasis. Nature (Lond.), 242: 148-149, 1973.
  14. Schreurs M. W. J., de Boer A. J., Figdor C. G., Adema G. J. Genetic vaccination against the melanocyte lineage-specific antigen gp100 induces cytotoxic T lymphocyte-mediated tumor protection. Cancer Res., 58: 2509-2514, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kupiec-Weglinski J. W., Austyn J. M., Morris P. Migration patterns of dendritic cells in the mouse. J. Exp. Med., 167: 632-645, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Pargador A., Gilboa E. Bone marrow generated dendritic cells pulsed with a class I-restricted peptide are potent inducers of cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med., 182: 255-260, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Mayordomo J. I., Zorina T., Storkus W. J., Zitvogel L., Celluzi C., Falo L. D., Melief C. J., Ildstadt S. T., Kast W. M., DeLeo A. B., Lotze M. T. Bone marrow-derived dendritic cells pulsed with synthetic tumor peptides elicit protective and therapeutic antitumor immunity. Nat. Med., 1: 1297-1302, 1995.[Medline]
  18. Flamand V., Sornasse T., Thielemans K., Demanet C., Bakkus M., Bazin H., Tielemans F., Leo O., Urbain J., Moser M. Murine dendritic cells pulsed in vitro with tumor antigen induce tumor resistance in vivo. Eur. J. Immunol., 24: 605-610, 1994.[Medline]
  19. Celluzi C. M., Mayordomo J. I., Storkus W. J., Lotze M. T., Falo L. D., Jr. Peptide-pulsed dendritic cells induce antigen-specific, CTL-mediated protective tumor immunity. J. Exp. Med., 183: 283-287, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. van den Eynde B. J., van der Bruggen P. T cell defined tumor antigens. Curr. Opin. Immunol., 9: 684-693, 1997.[Medline]
  21. Kawakami Y., Rosenberg S. A. Immunobiology of human melanoma antigens MART-1 and gp100 and their use for immunogene therapy. Int. Rev. Immunol., 14: 173-192, 1997.[Medline]
  22. Zitvogel L., Mayordomo J. I., Tjandrawan T., DeLeo A. B., Clarke M. R., Lotze M. T., Storkus W. J. Therapy of murine tumors with peptide-pulsed dendritic cells: dependence on T cells, B7 costimulation, and T helper cell 1-associated cytokines. J. Exp. Med., 183: 87-97, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Hsu F. J., Benike C., Fagnoni F., Liles T. M., Czerwinski D., Taidi B., Engelman E. G., Levy R. Vaccination of patients with B-cell lymphoma using autologous antigen-pulsed dendritic cells. Nat. Med., 2: 52-58, 1996.[Medline]
  24. Murphy G., Tjoa B., Ragde H., Kenny G., Boynton A. Phase I clinical trail: T-cell therapy for prostate cancer using autologous dendritic cells pulsed with HLA-A0201-specific peptides from prostate-specific membrane antigen. Prostate, 29: 371-380, 1996.[Medline]
  25. Morse M. A., Coleman R. E., Akabani G., Niehaus N., Coleman D., Lyerly H. K. Migration of human dendritic cells after injection in patients with metastatic malignancies. Cancer Res., 59: 56-58, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Barratt-Boyes S. M., Watkins S. C., Finn O. J. In vivo migration of dendritic cells differentiated in vitro. J. Immunol., 158: 4543-4547, 1997.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. C. Brinkman, S. L. Sheasley-O'Neill, A. R. Ferguson, and V. H. Engelhard
Activated CD8 T Cells Redistribute to Antigen-Free Lymph Nodes and Exhibit Effector and Memory Characteristics
J. Immunol., August 1, 2008; 181(3): 1814 - 1824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. L. Sheasley-O'Neill, C. C. Brinkman, A. R. Ferguson, M. C. Dispenza, and V. H. Engelhard
Dendritic Cell Immunization Route Determines Integrin Expression and Lymphoid and Nonlymphoid Tissue Distribution of CD8 T Cells
J. Immunol., February 1, 2007; 178(3): 1512 - 1522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Liu, B. A. Foster, T. Chen, G. Zheng, and A. Chen
Modifying Dendritic Cells via Protein Transfer for Antitumor Therapeutics
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2007; 13(1): 283 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
S. Gorantla, H. Dou, M. Boska, C. J. Destache, J. Nelson, L. Poluektova, B. E. Rabinow, H. E. Gendelman, and R. L. Mosley
Quantitative magnetic resonance and SPECT imaging for macrophage tissue migration and nanoformulated drug delivery
J. Leukoc. Biol., November 1, 2006; 80(5): 1165 - 1174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H.-R. Jiang, D. E. Gilham, K. Mulryan, N. Kirillova, R. E. Hawkins, and P. L. Stern
Combination of Vaccination and Chimeric Receptor Expressing T Cells Provides Improved Active Therapy of Tumors
J. Immunol., October 1, 2006; 177(7): 4288 - 4298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
S Nagaraj, C Ziske, J Strehl, D Messmer, T Sauerbruch, and I. Schmidt-Wolf
Dendritic cells pulsed with alpha-galactosylceramide induce anti-tumor immunity against pancreatic cancer in vivo
Int. Immunol., August 1, 2006; 18(8): 1279 - 1283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Kovar, O. Boyman, X. Shen, I. Hwang, R. Kohler, and J. Sprent
Direct stimulation of T cells by membrane vesicles from antigen-presenting cells
PNAS, August 1, 2006; 103(31): 11671 - 11676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. W. Mullins and V. H. Engelhard
Limited infiltration of exogenous dendritic cells and naive T cells restricts immune responses in peripheral lymph nodes.
J. Immunol., April 15, 2006; 176(8): 4535 - 4542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
J. L. M. Vissers, B. C. A. M. van Esch, G. A. Hofman, and A. J. M. van Oosterhout
Macrophages induce an allergen-specific and long-term suppression in a mouse asthma model
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2005; 26(6): 1040 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
R. van der Voort, M. Kramer, E. Lindhout, R. Torensma, D. Eleveld, A. W. T. van Lieshout, M. Looman, T. Ruers, T. R. D. J. Radstake, C. G. Figdor, et al.
Novel monoclonal antibodies detect elevated levels of the chemokine CCL18/DC-CK1 in serum and body fluids in pathological conditions
J. Leukoc. Biol., May 1, 2005; 77(5): 739 - 747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
D. Dieckmann, E. S. Schultz, B. Ring, P. Chames, G. Held, H. R. Hoogenboom, and G. Schuler
Optimizing the exogenous antigen loading of monocyte-derived dendritic cells
Int. Immunol., May 1, 2005; 17(5): 621 - 635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Junt, E. Scandella, R. Forster, P. Krebs, S. Krautwald, M. Lipp, H. Hengartner, and B. Ludewig
Impact of CCR7 on Priming and Distribution of Antiviral Effector and Memory CTL
J. Immunol., December 1, 2004; 173(11): 6684 - 6693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C.-J. Chang, K.-F. Tai, S. Roffler, and L.-H. Hwang
The Immunization Site of Cytokine-Secreting Tumor Cell Vaccines Influences the Trafficking of Tumor-Specific T Lymphocytes and Antitumor Efficacy against Regional Tumors
J. Immunol., November 15, 2004; 173(10): 6025 - 6032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
U. A. Duffner, Y. Maeda, K. R. Cooke, P. Reddy, R. Ordemann, C. Liu, J. L. M. Ferrara, and T. Teshima
Host Dendritic Cells Alone Are Sufficient to Initiate Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease
J. Immunol., June 15, 2004; 172(12): 7393 - 7398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
W. Brenner, A. Aicher, T. Eckey, S. Massoudi, M. Zuhayra, U. Koehl, C. Heeschen, W. U. Kampen, A. M. Zeiher, S. Dimmeler, et al.
111In-Labeled CD34+ Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells in a Rat Myocardial Infarction Model
J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2004; 45(3): 512 - 518.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. Matsuyoshi, S. Senju, S. Hirata, Y. Yoshitake, Y. Uemura, and Y. Nishimura
Enhanced Priming of Antigen-Specific CTLs In Vivo by Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Dendritic Cells Expressing Chemokine Along with Antigenic Protein: Application to Antitumor Vaccination
J. Immunol., January 15, 2004; 172(2): 776 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. A. O'Mara and P. M. Allen
Pulmonary Tumors Inefficiently Prime Tumor-Specific T Cells
J. Immunol., January 1, 2004; 172(1): 310 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
K. Brandt, S. Bulfone-Paus, D. C. Foster, and R. Ruckert
Interleukin-21 inhibits dendritic cell activation and maturation
Blood, December 1, 2003; 102(12): 4090 - 4098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
I. J. M. de Vries, W. J. Lesterhuis, N. M. Scharenborg, L. P. H. Engelen, D. J. Ruiter, M.-J. P. Gerritsen, S. Croockewit, C. M. Britten, R. Torensma, G. J. Adema, et al.
Maturation of Dendritic Cells Is a Prerequisite for Inducing Immune Responses in Advanced Melanoma Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2003; 9(14): 5091 - 5100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
D. W. Mullins, S. L. Sheasley, R. M. Ream, T. N.J. Bullock, Y.-X. Fu, and V. H. Engelhard
Route of Immunization with Peptide-pulsed Dendritic Cells Controls the Distribution of Memory and Effector T Cells in Lymphoid Tissues and Determines the Pattern of Regional Tumor Control
J. Exp. Med., October 6, 2003; 198(7): 1023 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. L. Thakur, R. Coss, R. Howell, D. Vassileva-Belnikolovska, J. Liu, S. P. Rao, G. Spana, P. Wachsberger, and D. L. Leeper
Role of Lipid-Soluble Complexes in Targeted Tumor Therapy
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2003; 44(8): 1293 - 1300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
M. Sato, K. Chamoto, and T. Nishimura
A novel tumor-vaccine cell therapy using bone marrow-derived dendritic cell type 1 and antigen-specific Th1 cells
Int. Immunol., July 1, 2003; 15(7): 837 - 843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Aicher, W. Brenner, M. Zuhayra, C. Badorff, S. Massoudi, B. Assmus, T. Eckey, E. Henze, A. M. Zeiher, and S. Dimmeler
Assessment of the Tissue Distribution of Transplanted Human Endothelial Progenitor Cells by Radioactive Labeling
Circulation, April 29, 2003; 107(16): 2134 - 2139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. J. Kobie, R. S. Wu, R. A. Kurt, S. Lou, M. K. Adelman, L. J. Whitesell, L. V. Ramanathapuram, C. L. Arteaga, and E. T. Akporiaye
Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Inhibits the Antigen-Presenting Functions and Antitumor Activity of Dendritic Cell Vaccines
Cancer Res., April 15, 2003; 63(8): 1860 - 1864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
W. Hou, Y. Wu, S. Sun, M. Shi, Y. Sun, C. Yang, G. Pei, Y. Gu, C. Zhong, and B. Sun
Pertussis Toxin Enhances Th1 Responses by Stimulation of Dendritic Cells
J. Immunol., February 15, 2003; 170(4): 1728 - 1736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
I. J. M. de Vries, D. J. E. B. Krooshoop, N. M. Scharenborg, W. J. Lesterhuis, J. H. S. Diepstra, G. N. P. van Muijen, S. P. Strijk, T. J. Ruers, O. C. Boerman, W. J. G. Oyen, et al.
Effective Migration of Antigen-pulsed Dendritic Cells to Lymph Nodes in Melanoma Patients Is Determined by Their Maturation State
Cancer Res., January 1, 2003; 63(1): 12 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
G. Parmiani, C. Castelli, P. Dalerba, R. Mortarini, L. Rivoltini, F. M. Marincola, and A. Anichini