Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 59, 3968-3971, August 1, 1999]
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reardon, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Sancar, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reardon, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Sancar, A.
[Cancer Research 59, 3968-3971, August 15, 1999]
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research


Biochemistry

Efficient Nucleotide Excision Repair of Cisplatin, Oxaliplatin, and Bis-aceto-ammine-dichloro-cyclohexylamine-platinum(IV) (JM216) PlatinumIntrastrand DNA Diadducts1

Joyce T. Reardon, Alexandra Vaisman, Stephen G. Chaney and Aziz Sancar2

Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7260


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Tumors exhibit a spectrum of cellular responses to chemotherapy ranging from extreme sensitivity to resistance, either intrinsic or acquired. These variable responses are both patient and tumor specific. For platinum DNA-damaging agents, drug resistance depends on the carrier ligand of the platinum complex and is due to a combination of mechanisms including DNA repair. Nucleotide excision repair is the only known mechanism by which bulky adducts, including those generated by platinum chemotherapeutic agents, are removed from DNA in human cells. In this report, we show that the types of DNA lesions generated by three platinum drugs, cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and (Bis-aceto-ammine-dichloro-cyclohexylamine-platinum(IV) (JM216), are repaired in vitro with similar kinetics by the mammalian nucleotide excision repair pathway.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Nucleotide excision repair is a major pathway used by human cells for the removal of damaged or inappropriate bases from DNA (1 , 2) . In mammalian cells, this repair pathway is the only known mechanism for the removal of bulky, helix-distorting DNA adducts, such as those generated by certain chemotherapeutic agents, and it serves as a backup repair system for the removal of other lesions from DNA (3) . XP3 is a human disease caused by mutations in any of seven genes, XP-A through XP-G, and patients are predisposed to cancer due to specific defects in nucleotide excision repair (4) . Cell lines derived from XP patients are sensitive to UV light and to treatment with cisplatin (5) . The human nucleotide excision repair pathway uses 14 polypeptides purified as six repair factors for the initial steps of repair: XPA, RPA, XPC·HR23B, TFIIH, XPG, and XPF·ERCC1 (1, 2, 3) . These initial steps include: (a) damage recognition; (b) dual incisions both 5' and 3' to the damaged base(s); and (c) excision of 22–32 nucleotide-long oligomers containing the damage. Subsequent steps include resynthesis of DNA to fill-in the gap generated by damage excision and ligation of the newly synthesized DNA to the parental molecule.

Cisplatin is an effective chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of testicular cancer and is used in combination regimens for a variety of other tumors, including ovarian, cervical, bladder, lung, and those of the head and neck (6) . Although many patients initially respond to treatment, a common problem is acquired resistance. This, as well as the intrinsic resistance observed in some patients, is multifactorial in nature and includes contributions from differential drug uptake, cellular detoxification systems, and DNA repair mechanisms (7 , 8) . The need for improved clinical protocols has prompted a search for new chemotherapeutic agents as well as a more complete understanding of the cellular mechanisms underlying resistance. Two new platinum compounds, oxaliplatin and JM216, show promise for the treatment of cisplatin-resistant tumors and are presently in clinical trials (6) . A recent report correlated the loss of DNA mismatch repair activity with enhanced sensitivity to cisplatin but not oxaliplatin or JM216 (9) . Nucleotide excision repair is also a major mechanism contributing to cisplatin resistance, and so we were curious as to whether this pathway discriminates between cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and JM216 adducts.

Several reports, using uniquely damaged circular or linear DNA as substrate and CFEs or highly purified proteins as the source of repair factors, have demonstrated that cisplatin adducts are removed from DNA during in vitro repair reactions (10, 11, 12) . In this study, we wanted to directly compare the in vitro repair of cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and JM216 lesions. To this end, we used a 140-bp linear duplex with a centrally located diadduct as substrate, CFE prepared from either human or rodent cell lines, and the excision assay to examine the repair of cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and JM216 diadducts. Excision assay substrate DNA has a 32P label near the lesion, and following incubation with the full complement of repair factors, damage-containing oligomers are released as radiolabeled DNA fragments that are visualized after gel electrophoresis and autoradiography. The results presented here demonstrate that both the kinetics of repair and the mechanistic details of excision are similar for all three platinum lesions.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Materials.
Cisplatin was obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO), Pt(dach)Cl2 was provided by Dr. S. D. Wyrick (School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina), and JM118 was provided by Dr. C. F. J. Barnard (Johnson Matthey Technology Center, London, United Kingdom). Oligonucleotides for excision repair substrate preparation were obtained from Operon Technologies (Alameda, CA) or the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Nucleic Acids Core Facility (Chapel Hill, NC). T4 polynucleotide kinase and T4 DNA ligase were purchased from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA), T4 DNA polymerase was from Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Indianapolis, IN), ATP and deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Piscataway, NJ), and [{gamma}-32P]ATP (7000 Ci/mmol; 1Ci = 37 GBq) was obtained from ICN (Irvine, CA).

CFEs.
The HeLa S3 cell line was from the stock of Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (Chapel Hill, NC). CHO cell lines were from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA): CRL 1859 (AA8, wild-type, parental); CRL 1860 (UV41, ERCC4, XP-F); and CRL 1867 (UV135, ERCC5, XP-G). CFEs (10–20 mg/ml) were prepared as described (13) from two to three liters of cultured cells in exponential growth phase and kept at -80°C in storage buffer [25 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.9), 100 mM KCl, 12 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, and 12.5% (v/v) glycerol].

DNA Substrates.
Oxaliplatin and JM216 react poorly with DNA in vitro, but their biotransformation products, Pt(dach)Cl2 and JM118 (Fig. 1)Citation , react more readily with DNA in vitro and form adducts with the same carrier ligands as those formed by oxaliplatin and JM216 in vivo. To further facilitate their reaction with DNA, cisplatin, Pt(dach)Cl2, and JM118 were converted to their aquated derivatives (Fig. 1)Citation by overnight stirring with a 2:1 ratio of AgNO3 at room temperature in the dark. A 12-mer (5'-TCTAGGCCTTCT) was incubated for 2 h at 37°C in the dark with aquated derivatives of cisplatin, Pt(dach)Cl2, or JM118 at a 10:1 drug:nucleotide ratio. Under these conditions, the major reaction product formed with all three platinum complexes contained a single Pt adduct located at the GG sequence. Complete details of platination reactions and purification of oligonucleotides containing a single Pt adduct will be presented elsewhere.4 These singly platinated oligomers were used for preparation of linear 140-bp duplexes with centrally located diadducts at nucleotides 69–70 (14) . Uniquely modified 12-mers were end-labeled with T4 polynucleotide kinase and [{gamma}-32P]ATP to introduce a radiolabel at the fifth phosphodiester bond 5' to the GG diadduct, annealed with a set of five complementary and partially overlapping oligomers, and ligated with T4 DNA ligase. Full-length substrate was separated from unligated products in a 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel, purified by electroelution, reannealed, and stored in annealing buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM DTT] at -20°C.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Structures of the drugs, biotransformation products and aquated derivatives for the platinum compounds used in this study. Pt(dach)Cl2 and JM118 are thought to be the active metabolites of oxaliplatin and JM216, respectively. Aquated derivatives of these complexes and cisplatin were used to modify oligonucleotides used in the preparation of in vitro excision repair substrates.

 
Excision Assay.
In vitro repair of platinum lesions was measured with the excision assay using linear DNA substrates and whole-cell extracts as described (15) , except the reaction mixtures contained 10 fmol of radiolabeled DNA, 12.6 fmol of pBR322, and 50 µg of CFE in 25 µl of reaction buffer [17 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.9), 12 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 35 mM KCl, 44 mM NaCl, 5.8 mM MgCl2, 0.3 mM EDTA, 0.34 mM DTT, 4 mM ATP, 20 µM each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and TTP, and 2.5% glycerol with BSA at 200 µg/ml] and were incubated at 30°C for 30 min, except where indicated otherwise. For complementation assays, 25 µg of each repair-deficient CFE was premixed on ice and used in the reaction. For kinetic experiments, the reaction mixture components were increased proportionately, and 25-µl aliquots were removed at the indicated time points. Deproteinized DNA was precipitated with ethanol, resuspended in formamide/dye mixture, and resolved in 10% denaturing polyacrylamide gels. After autoradiography, the level of excision was quantified by scanning dried gels with an AMBIS systems scanner.

Mapping of Incision Sites.
T4 DNA polymerase 3'->5' exonuclease activity was used to map the primary sites of incision. If a DNA adduct is a block to the exonuclease activity, limited digestion with T4 DNA polymerase serves two purposes: (a) it demonstrates that the damaged base(s) is in the excised oligomer; and (b) it is used to map the 3' incision site. Excision assays were conducted with 50–150 fmol of radiolabeled DNA and 125 µg of CHO AA8 CFE in 25 µl of reaction buffer for 45 min at 30°C. Gel-purified excision products were incubated for 10 min at 30°C with T4 DNA polymerase (0.25 unit) in 10 µl of buffer provided by the manufacturer [50 mM Tris (pH 8.8), 15 mM (NH4)2SO4, 7 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 50 mM ß-mercaptoethanol, and 20 µg/ml BSA] supplemented with 0.5 µg HaeIII digested {phi}{chi} DNA and visualized by autoradiography following resolution in 10% denaturing polyacrylamide gels. Similar analyses using radiolabeled, platinated 12-mers were used to identify the nucleotide(s) at which the exonuclease activity of T4 DNA polymerase is blocked 3' to the lesion. The location of the 5' incision site made by the excinuclease was determined by comparison of the primary 3' incision site with the length of excision products observed in the absence of T4 DNA polymerase digestion.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Repair of 1,2-d(GpG) Platinum Adducts by Mammalian CFEs.
Efficient repair of 1,2-d(GpG) cisplatin diadducts has been reported (10 , 11) . The results presented here (Fig. 2)Citation confirm these reports and also demonstrate that the oxaliplatin and JM216 lesions are repaired as efficiently as cisplatin diadducts by both the human and rodent excinucleases (HeLa and AA8 CFE, respectively). The excision repair assay detects radiolabeled fragments resulting from dual incisions both 5' and 3' to the lesion, and for the platinated substrates, the excised fragments were primarily 23–28 nucleotides in length, although 22–31 nucleotide-long fragments were also observed (Fig. 2A)Citation . This range of product sizes reflects variability at both the 3' and 5' incision sites (16) ; smaller excision products are due to degradation of the primary excision products by exonucleases present in the extracts, and in this experiment, the degradation is most evident when DNA was incubated with CHO AA8 CFE (Fig. 2ACitation , Lanes 2, 5 and 8). Because the human and CHO excision repair proteins are interchangeable (1, 2, 3) , we conducted complementation experiments with CHO wild-type and mutant CFEs because of the higher quality extracts obtainable from these cells relative to human cell lines. When platinated substrates were incubated with CFEs prepared from mutant CHO cell lines belonging to complementation groups 4 and 5, equivalent to human XPF and XPG, excision products were not observed (Fig. 2BCitation , Lanes 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, and 11). Repair activity, as evidenced by the generation of radiolabeled excision products, was restored to wild-type levels (Fig. 2BCitation , Lanes 1, 5, and 9) when a mixture of CFEs from two complementation groups was incubated with substrate DNA (Fig. 2BCitation , Lanes 4, 8, and 12). Other radiolabeled fragments that appear as a DNA ladder are caused by low levels of nicking at random positions; this activity is not associated with repair. We observed this ladder with all three platinated DNA substrates, and in this experiment, it is most pronounced for the cisplatin substrate incubated with CHO-XPG CFE (Fig. 2BCitation , Lane 3) due to sample overloading.



View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Excision of 1,2-d(GpG) platinum adducts by human and rodent excinucleases. A, substrates containing cisplatin, oxaliplatin, or JM216 lesions were incubated with either AA8 or HeLa CFEs. Excision products released during the reaction are primarily 23–28 nucleotides in length and are not observed in the absence of CFEs (Lanes 1, 4, and 7). In this experiment, the percentages of excision by AA8 CFE were 7.6, 5.5, and 8.0 for cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and JM 216 diadducts, respectively; for HeLa CFEs, these values were 2.1, 1.1, and 2.3. Note that the low efficiency of excision by HeLa CFE is a property of this particular extract as, in general, HeLa and AA8 CFEs have comparable excision activities. B, dual incisions require the functional excinuclease present in wild-type AA8 CFE, and excision products are not observed when substrates are incubated with mutant CFEs from either complementation group 4, CHO-XPF, or complementation group 5, CHO-XPG. Excision is reconstituted when mutant CFEs are mixed together in the reaction (Lanes 4, 8, and 12). The percentage of excision observed with AA8 CFE or for complementation were 8.0 and 6.8 for cisplatin, 6.8 and 6.0 for oxaliplatin, and 7.1 and 9.8 for JM216. The percentage of excision was calculated by dividing the cpm in the 22–31-nucleotide region by the total cpm loaded in the lane. For both panels, the location of full-length 140-bp substrate is identified by an arrow; brackets, the major excision products. The fragments migrating immediately below the 140-mer are a combination of incomplete ligation products present in the substrate and fragments generated by nonspecific nucleases in the CFEs. Degradation of primary excision products (A, Lanes 2, 5, and 8) and the ladder generated by random nicking (B, Lane 3) are discussed in the text.

 
Kinetics of Removal of 1,2-d(GpG) Diadducts by Human CFEs.
The relative rates of excision for cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and JM216 lesions were analyzed by performing time course experiments with HeLa CFEs under substrate limiting conditions (Fig. 3)Citation . Consistent with a previous report (11) , the maximum level of in vitro repair for the 1,2-d(GpG) cisplatin diadduct by HeLa CFEs (Fig. 3A)Citation was observed between 30 and 60 min (Fig. 3D)Citation . At later time points, the primary excision products were partially degraded to smaller fragments as discussed above (Fig. 3 A–CCitation , compare 60- and 90-min time points with 15- and 30-min time points). The cisplatin diadduct was excised at an intermediate, but not significantly different (Student’s paired t test), rate relative to the oxaliplatin and JM216 lesions (Fig. 3, B, C, and D)Citation , and no significant differences were found for the repair of oxaliplatin, cisplatin, and JM216 lesions.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Kinetics of removal of 1,2-d(GpG) cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and JM216 diadducts by HeLa excinuclease. A–C, after the excision reaction, DNA was resolved in 10% denaturing polyacrylamide gels to separate excision products from substrate DNA and visualized by autoradiography. The entire autorad is shown in A for the cisplatin substrate; only the excision product regions of autorads are shown in B and C for oxaliplatin and JM216 lesions, respectively. D, quantitative analysis of the kinetic experiments. {triangleup}, cisplatin repair; {square}, oxaliplatin lesions; {circ}, JM216 lesions. Data points are the average of two independent experiments done under the same conditions; bars, range of excision; where no error bars are seen, they are smaller than the size of the symbols.

 
Incision Sites.
Incubation of platinated 12 mers with T4 DNA polymerase in the absence of dNTPs (Fig. 4)Citation was used to determine the nucleotide at which the exonuclease activity is inhibited. After incubation with T4 DNA polymerase under these conditions, platinated 12-mers migrated primarily as a species two nucleotides shorter than the starting material (Fig. 4ACitation and data not shown for cisplatin), indicating that, for all three compounds, the exonuclease activity is blocked at the fourth nucleotide 3' to the platinum diadduct. When the 28-mer excision products, generated by repair of cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and JM216 diadducts, were treated in the same manner, they were shortened by six nucleotides (Fig. 4BCitation and data not shown for cisplatin). Because the data with the 12-mer show that T4 3'->5' exonuclease stops four nucleotides 3' to the diadduct, we conclude that the 3' incision site is 10 nucleotides (or at the 11th phosphodiester bond) 3' to the diadducts. This in turn places the other incision site at the 17th phosphodiester bond 5' to each platinum diadduct.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Mapping of incision sites. A, time course analyses with T4 DNA polymerase and platinated 12-mers were used to identify sites(s) of inhibition of T4 DNA polymerase exonuclease activity. At all time points, this exonuclease activity was primarily blocked at the fourth nucleotide 3' to the diadduct, resulting in migration of platinated 12-mers as platinated 10-mers; this same pattern of exonuclease stop sites was observed for cisplatin (data not shown). B, limited (10-min) T4 DNA polymerase digestion was used to identify the 3' incision site of gel-purified oligomers released during the excision repair reaction. For both the oxaliplatin and JM216 diadducts, as well as the cisplatin adduct (data not shown), the excised 28-mer (Lanes 1 and 3) migrated as a 22-mer (Lanes 2 and 4) after treatment with T4 DNA polymerase. Thus, XPG makes the first incision at the 11th phosphodiester bond 3' to the damage and then XPF•ERCC1 incises at the 17th bond on the 5' side to generate a 28-mer excision product.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The damage recognition step of nucleotide excision repair is most likely the rate-limiting step, and XPA and RPA interact to form the initial damage recognition subunit (1, 2, 3) . Although the precise molecular mechanism for distinguishing DNA lesions from normal bp has not been established, the most convincing arguments suggest that a lesion-specific helical distortion, accompanied by localized bp denaturation, is a signal of DNA damage (17) , which then permits the damage recognition subunits to recruit other excinuclease components. When the in vitro excision assay is used to monitor DNA repair, we observed a hierarchy of substrate preference with cisplatin lesions near the top of the list (1) , and based on the results presented here, oxaliplatin and JM216 diadducts may also be classified as good substrates for the in vitro repair reaction. In this study, we observed similar kinetics for removal of cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and JM216 diadducts, which suggests a similar rate-limiting, damage-recognition step, and is consistent with the recent report that cisplatin and JM216 diadducts cause similar helical distortions in DNA (18) ; it will be interesting to see how the oxaliplatin-DNA structure compares with that reported for cisplatin and JM216.

Additional subunits are recruited to the damage site and, after enzymatic unwinding of the DNA helix in the area of the lesion, dual incisions are made by XPG and XPF·ERCC1 (1, 2, 3) . On the basis of T4 DNA polymerase mapping and other experiments (14 , 16) , we have reported that, for the majority of DNA lesions [including thymine cyclobutane dimer, (6-4) photoproduct, psoralen-thymine adduct, and acetylaminofluorene guanosine adduct], the incision made by XPG is at 6 ± 3 phosphodiester bonds 3' to DNA damage, and that the incision by XPF·ERCC1 is 20 ± 5 bonds 5' to the lesion, resulting in release of damage-containing oligomers primarily 22–32 nucleotides in length. However, in the case of the 1,3-intrastrand d(GpTpG) cisplatin diadduct, the incision sites were reported to be at the extremes of the range: the 16th phosphodiester bond 5' and the 9th phosphodiester bond 3' to the lesion (13) . The major excision product size that we report (28 mer) is generated by 5' and 3' incisions at the 17th and 11th phosphodiester bonds, respectively. This suggests that "shifted" 3' incision sites may be a common phenomenon for platinum lesions, including 1,3-intrastrand d(GpTpG) cisplatin diadducts (13) and 1,2-d(GpG)-diadducts generated by cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and JM216.

With in vitro repair assays, we typically observe maximal levels of excision within 1 h compared with 6–24 h for cultured cells, and the overall level of repair is considerably lower than that observed for cultured cells, presumably because of inactivation of the enzyme in vitro and nonspecific degradation of substrate. Our finding of similar extents of repair for cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and JM216 lesions are consistent with reports that the effectiveness of Pt-dach complexes, such as oxaliplatin, in cell lines with acquired cisplatin resistance cannot be explained by differences in overall repair of cisplatin or Pt-dach adducts (19 , 20) .

A precise molecular mechanism for primary or acquired cisplatin resistance is not known, and in most cases, the resistance is multifactorial in nature. Because DNA lesions are considered to be the main lesions that cause cellular death, the efficiency of removal of cisplatin and its analogues by nucleotide excision repair is expected to play a role in drug response. It is not likely that the modest in vitro differences that we report for both the initial kinetics and the overall rate of repair would translate into more pronounced effects in vivo. We conclude that cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and JM216 lesions are removed with similar in vitro efficiencies by the nucleotide excision repair pathway, and that the mechanism of excision, as defined by the requirement for both XPF·ERCC1 and XPG and the location of 3' and 5' incision sites, is the same for all three diadducts. Thus, the effectiveness of oxaliplatin and JM216 in cisplatin-resistant cell lines is not likely to be due to the differential removal of these lesions by nucleotide excision repair enzymes.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank P. E. Juniewicz and J. Rake for critical reading of the manuscript and useful comments, and we are grateful to S. D. Wyrick and C. F. J. Barnard for gifts of Pt(dach)Cl2 and JM118.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by NIH Grant GM32833 (to A. S.) and a research contract from Sanofi Pharmaceuticals (to S. G. C.). Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Mary Ellen Jones Building, CB # 7260, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7260. Phone: (919) 962-0115; Fax: (919) 966-2852. Back

3 The abbreviations used are: XP, xeroderma pigmentosum; cisplatin, cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II); oxaliplatin, (trans-R,R)1,2-diaminocyclohexaneoxalatoplatinum(II); Pt(dach)Cl2, (trans-R,R)1,2-diaminocyclohexanedichloroplatinum(II); JM216, bis-acetato-ammine-dichloro-cyclohexylamine-platinum(IV); JM118, cis-amminedichloro(cyclohexylamine)platinum(II); ERCC, excision-repair cross complementing; CFE, cell-free extract; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary. Back

4 A. Vaisman, S. E. Lim, S. M. Patrick, W. C. Copeland, D. C. Hinkle, J. J. Turchi, and S. G. Chaney. The effect of DNA polymerases and HMG1 on the carrier ligand specificity for translesion synthesis past Pt-DNA adducts, in press. Back

Received 3/24/99. Accepted 6/17/99.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Sancar A. DNA excision repair. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 65: 43-81, 1996.[Medline]
  2. Wood R. D. DNA repair in eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 65: 135-167, 1996.[Medline]
  3. Reardon J. T., Sancar A. Molecular mechanism of nucleotide excision repair in mammalian cells Dizdaroglu M. Karakaya A. eds. . Advances in DNA Damage and Repair, : 377-393, Plenum Publishing Corp. New York 1998.
  4. Cleaver J. E., Kraemer K. H. Xeroderma pigmentosum Scriver C. R. Beaudet A. L. Sly W. S. Valle D. eds. . The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease, 2: 2949-2971, McGraw-Hill New York 1989.
  5. Plooy A. C. M., van Dijk M., Berends F., Lohman P. H. M. Formation and repair of DNA interstrand cross-links in relation to cytotoxicity and unscheduled DNA synthesis induced in control and mutant human cells treated with cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II). Cancer Res., 45: 4178-4184, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Chaney S. G., Sancar A. DNA repair: enzymatic mechanisms and relevance to drug response. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 88: 1347-1360, 1996.
  7. Zamble D. B., Lippard S. J. Cisplatin and DNA repair in cancer chemotherapy. Trends Biochem. Sci., 20: 435-439, 1995.[Medline]
  8. Reed E., Dabholkar M., Chabner B. A. Platinum analogues Ed. 2 Chabner B. A. Longo D. L. eds. . Cancer Chemotherapy and Biotherapy: Principles and Practice, : 357-378, Lippincott-Raven Publishers Philadelphia 1996.
  9. Fink D., Nebel S., Aebi S., Zheng H., Cenni B., Nehmé A., Christen R. D., Howell S. B. The role of DNA mismatch repair in platinum drug resistance. Cancer Res., 56: 4881-4886, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Huang J-C., Zamble D. B., Reardon J. T., Lippard S. J., Sancar A. HMG-domain proteins specifically inhibit the repair of the major DNA adduct of the anticancer drug cisplatin by human excision nuclease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 91: 10394-10398, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Zamble D. B., Mu D., Reardon J. T., Sancar A., Lippard S. J. Repair of cisplatin-DNA adducts by the mammalian excision nuclease. Biochemistry, 35: 10004-10013, 1996.[Medline]
  12. Moggs J. G., Yarema K. J., Essigmann J. M., Wood R. D. Analysis of incision sites produced by human cell extracts and purified proteins during nucleotide excision repair of a 1,3-intrastrand d(GpTpG)-cisplatin adduct. J. Biol. Chem., 271: 7177-7186, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Manley J. L., Fire A., Cano A., Sharp P. A., Gefter M. L. DNA-dependent transcription of adenovirus genes in a soluble whole-cell extract. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 77: 3855-3859, 1980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Matsunaga T., Mu D., Park C-H., Reardon J. T., Sancar A. Human DNA repair excision nuclease. Analysis of the roles of the subunits involved in dual incisions by using anti-XPG and anti-ERCC1 antibodies. J. Biol. Chem., 270: 20862-20869, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Reardon J. T., Thompson L. H., Sancar A. Rodent UV-sensitive mutant cell lines in complementation groups 6–10 have normal general excision repair activity. Nucleic Acids Res., 25: 1015-1021, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Huang J-C., Svoboda D. L., Reardon J. T., Sancar A. Human nucleotide excision nuclease removes thymine dimers from DNA by incising the 22nd phosphodiester bond 5' and the 6th phosphodiester bond 3' to the photodimer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 89: 3664-3668, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Gunz D., Hess M. T., Naegeli H. Recognition of DNA adducts by human nucleotide excision repair. Evidence for a thermodynamic probing mechanism. J. Biol. Chem., 271: 25089-25098, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Dunham S. U., Dunham S. U., Turner C. J., Lippard S. J. Solution structure of a DNA duplex containing a nitroxide spin-labeled platinum d(GpG) intrastrand cross-link refined with NMR-derived long-range electron-proton distance restraints. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120: 5395-5406, 1998.
  19. Gibbons G. R., Page J. D., Mauldin S. K., Husain I., Chaney S. G. Role of carrier ligand in platinum resistance in L1210 cells. Cancer Res., 50: 6497-6501, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Schmidt W., Chaney S. G. Role of carrier ligand in platinum resistance of human carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Res., 53: 799-805, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. S. Lovejoy, R. C. Todd, S. Zhang, M. S. McCormick, J. A. D'Aquino, J. T. Reardon, A. Sancar, K. M. Giacomini, and S. J. Lippard
cis-Diammine(pyridine)chloroplatinum(II), a monofunctional platinum(II) antitumor agent: Uptake, structure, function, and prospects
PNAS, July 1, 2008; 105(26): 8902 - 8907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
H. Choy, C. Park, and M. Yao
Current Status and Future Prospects for Satraplatin, an Oral Platinum Analogue
Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2008; 14(6): 1633 - 1638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
J. Malina, O. Novakova, M. Vojtiskova, G. Natile, and V. Brabec
Conformation of DNA GG Intrastrand Cross-Link of Antitumor Oxaliplatin and Its Enantiomeric Analog
Biophys. J., December 1, 2007; 93(11): 3950 - 3962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
P. Lonning, S Knappskog, V Staalesen, R Chrisanthar, and J. Lillehaug
Breast cancer prognostication and prediction in the postgenomic era
Ann. Onc., August 1, 2007; 18(8): 1293 - 1306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
K. Chvalova, V. Brabec, and J. Kasparkova
Mechanism of the formation of DNA-protein cross-links by antitumor cisplatin
Nucleic Acids Res., March 19, 2007; 35(6): 1812 - 1821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
J Bellmunt, L Paz-Ares, M Cuello, F. Cecere, S Albiol, V Guillem, E Gallardo, J Carles, P Mendez, J. de la Cruz, et al.
Gene expression of ERCC1 as a novel prognostic marker in advanced bladder cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy
Ann. Onc., March 1, 2007; 18(3): 522 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
P Ceppi, M Volante, S Novello, I Rapa, K. Danenberg, P. Danenberg, A Cambieri, G Selvaggi, S Saviozzi, R Calogero, et al.
ERCC1 and RRM1 gene expressions but not EGFR are predictive of shorter survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with cisplatin and gemcitabine
Ann. Onc., December 1, 2006; 17(12): 1818 - 1825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
J. Kasparkova, O. Novakova, O. Vrana, F. Intini, G. Natile, and V. Brabec
Molecular Aspects of Antitumor Effects of a New Platinum(IV) Drug
Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2006; 70(5): 1708 - 1719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
P. A. Mehta, T. A. Alonzo, R. B. Gerbing, J. S. Elliott, T. A. Wilke, R. J. Kennedy, J. A. Ross, J. P. Perentesis, B. J. Lange, and S. M. Davies
XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism in the etiology and outcome of childhood acute myeloid leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group report
Blood, January 1, 2006; 107(1): 39 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. R. Albertella, C. M. Green, A. R. Lehmann, and M. J. O'Connor
A Role for Polymerase {eta} in the Cellular Tolerance to Cisplatin-Induced Damage
Cancer Res., November 1, 2005; 65(21): 9799 - 9806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
V. Marini, P. Christofis, O. Novakova, J. Kasparkova, N. Farrell, and V. Brabec
Conformation, protein recognition and repair of DNA interstrand and intrastrand cross-links of Antitumor trans-[PtCl2(NH3)(thiazole)]
Nucleic Acids Res., October 19, 2005; 33(18): 5819 - 5828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. Viguier, V. Boige, C. Miquel, M. Pocard, B. Giraudeau, J.-C. Sabourin, M. Ducreux, A. Sarasin, and F. Praz
ERCC1 Codon 118 Polymorphism Is a Predictive Factor for the Tumor Response to Oxaliplatin/5-Fluorouracil Combination Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2005; 11(17): 6212 - 6217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
W. L. Allen and P. G. Johnston
Role of Genomic Markers in Colorectal Cancer Treatment
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2005; 23(20): 4545 - 4552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
V. Bursova, J. Kasparkova, C. Hofr, and V. Brabec
Effects of Monofunctional Adducts of Platinum(II) Complexes on Thermodynamic Stability and Energetics of DNA Duplexes
Biophys. J., February 1, 2005; 88(2): 1207 - 1214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. M. Allan, A. G. Smith, K. Wheatley, R. K. Hills, L. B. Travis, D. A. Hill, D. M. Swirsky, G. J. Morgan, and C. P. Wild
Genetic variation in XPD predicts treatment outcome and risk of acute myeloid leukemia following chemotherapy
Blood, December 15, 2004; 104(13): 3872 - 3877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
W. Zhou, S. Gurubhagavatula, G. Liu, S. Park, D. S. Neuberg, J. C. Wain, T. J. Lynch, L. Su, and D. C. Christiani
Excision Repair Cross-Complementation Group 1 Polymorphism Predicts Overall Survival in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2004; 10(15): 4939 - 4943.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Kasparkova, O. Novakova, V. Marini, Y. Najajreh, D. Gibson, J.-M. Perez, and V. Brabec
Activation of Trans Geometry in Bifunctional Mononuclear Platinum Complexes by a Piperidine Ligand: MECHANISTIC STUDIES ON ANTITUMOR ACTION
J. Biol. Chem., November 28, 2003; 278(48): 47516 - 47525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
O. Novakova, J. Kasparkova, J. Malina, G. Natile, and V. Brabec
DNA-protein cross-linking by trans-[PtCl2(E-iminoether)2]. A concept for activation of the trans geometry in platinum antitumor complexes
Nucleic Acids Res., November 15, 2003; 31(22): 6450 - 6460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. Koivusalo, E. Krausz, P. Ruotsalainen, H. Helenius, and S. Hietanen
Chemoradiation of Cervical Cancer Cells: Targeting Human Papillomavirus E6 and p53 Leads to Either Augmented or Attenuated Apoptosis Depending on the Platinum Carrier Ligand
Cancer Res., December 15, 2002; 62(24): 7364 - 7371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Kasparkova, J. Zehnulova, N. Farrell, and V. Brabec
DNA Interstrand Cross-links of the Novel Antitumor Trinuclear Platinum Complex BBR3464. CONFORMATION, RECOGNITION BY HIGH MOBILITY GROUP DOMAIN PROTEINS, AND NUCLEOTIDE EXCISION REPAIR
J. Biol. Chem., December 6, 2002; 277(50): 48076 - 48086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. V. N. Lord, J. Brabender, D. Gandara, V. Alberola, C. Camps, M. Domine, F. Cardenal, J. M. Sanchez, P. H. Gumerlock, M. Taron, et al.
Low ERCC1 Expression Correlates with Prolonged Survival after Cisplatin plus Gemcitabine Chemotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2002; 8(7): 2286 - 2291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
E. Raymond, S. Faivre, S. Chaney, J. Woynarowski, and E. Cvitkovic
Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology of Oxaliplatin
Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2002; 1(3): 227 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
Y. Shirota, J. Stoehlmacher, J. Brabender, Y.-P. Xiong, H. Uetake, K. D. Danenberg, S. Groshen, D. D. Tsao-Wei, P. V. Danenberg, and H.-J. Lenz
ERCC1 and Thymidylate Synthase mRNA Levels Predict Survival for Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving Combination Oxaliplatin and Fluorouracil Chemotherapy
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2001; 19(23): 4298 - 4304.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
J. M. Woynarowski, S. Faivre, M. C.S. Herzig, B. Arnett, W. G. Chapman, A. V. Trevino, E. Raymond, S. G. Chaney, A. Vaisman, M. Varchenko, et al.
Oxaliplatin-Induced Damage of Cellular DNA
Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2000; 58(5): 920 - 927.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Shibutani, J. T. Reardon, N. Suzuki, and A. Sancar
Excision of Tamoxifen-DNA Adducts by the Human Nucleotide Excision Repair System
Cancer Res., May 1, 2000; 60(10): 2607 - 2610.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Zehnulova, J. Kasparkova, N. Farrell, and V. Brabec
Conformation, Recognition by High Mobility Group Domain Proteins, and Nucleotide Excision Repair of DNA Intrastrand Cross-links of Novel Antitumor Trinuclear Platinum Complex BBR3464
J. Biol. Chem., June 15, 2001; 276(25): 22191 - 22199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reardon, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Sancar, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reardon, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Sancar, A.


HOME