Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention  Susan G. Komen for the Cure-AACR Outstanding Investigator Award for Breast Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

[Cancer Research 59, 4204-4207, September 1, 1999]
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goan, Y.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Yen, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goan, Y.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Yen, Y.
[Cancer Research 59, 4204-4207, September 1, 1999]
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research


Advances in Brief

Overexpression of Ribonucleotide Reductase as a Mechanism of Resistance to 2,2-Difluorodeoxycytidine in the Human KB Cancer Cell Line1

Yih-Gang Goan, Bingsen Zhou, Edward Hu, Shu Mi and Yun Yen2

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Veterans General Hospital-Kaohsiung, and National Yang-Ming University, Taiwan, Republic of China [Y-G. G.]; and Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California 91010 [B. Z., E. H., S. M., Y. Y.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
In this study, human oropharyngeal epidermoid carcinoma KB cells that were resistant to 2,2-difluorodeoxycytidine (dFdCyd) were selected and designated the KB-Gem clone. The KB parental cell line IC50 was 0.3 µM dFdCyd, as compared with the KB-Gem clone IC50 of 32 µM dFdCyd. The KB-Gem clone demonstrated overexpression of ribonucleotide reductase (RR) M2 subunit mRNA (9-fold) and overexpression of M2 protein (2-fold); RR activity was 2.3-fold higher than the KB parental cell line. Both the dATP and dCTP pools of the KB-Gem clone increased 2-fold over the parental cell line, with no change in the dGTP and dTTP pools. Reverse transcriptase-PCR was used to clone the cDNA of deoxycytidine kinase (DCK). Resulting sequences revealed two silent mutations in the KB-Gem clone. The amino acid sequence of the DCK protein and mRNA expression remained unchanged. The KB-Gem clone’s DCK enzyme activity was 56% of that of the parental cell line. After the endogenous dNTPs were removed with a G-25 column, no difference was evident between the enzyme activities of the KB-Gem clone and parental cells. Thus, contrary to previous hypotheses, DCK deficiency does not play the primary role in the resistance mechanism of dFdCyd, accepting a secondary role to the overexpression of the target gene, RR, and pool expansion.


    Introduction
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
dFdCyd3 (gemcitabine) is a novel deoxycytidine analogue with antitumor activity that bears a resemblance, structurally and metabolically, to Ara-C (1) . Pharmacologically, DCK phosphorylates dFdCyd to dFdCMP, and other kinases phosphorylate dFdCMP intracellularly to its di- and triphosphate forms (2 , 3) . RR is inhibited by dFdCDP. The incorporation of the active metabolite dFdCTP triphosphate molecule into the DNA strand halts DNA elongation because only one more dNTP molecule can be joined to the DNA strand (1, 2, 3) . Gemcitabine diphosphate reduces competition with deoxycytidine by directly inhibiting RR, thereby lowering deoxynucleotide production (1, 2, 3) . RR is an S phase-specific, rate-limiting enzyme of the DNA synthesis pathway (4) . RR is mainly responsible for the conversion of ribonucleoside diphosphate to deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate, which is essential for DNA synthesis (4 , 5) . RR consists of two subunits, M1 and M2. The M1 subunit possesses a binding site for enzyme regulation, and the M2 subunit is involved with RR activity, as it is related to DNA synthesis and cell proliferation and metastatic potential (6 , 7) . Gemcitabine has been used widely in the treatment of lung, pancreatic, and head and neck cancer (8 , 9) . Understanding the mechanism of resistance to gemcitabine is important because of its potentially widespread clinical applications. Previous reports cited the DCK mutation/deficiency as the main mechanism for gemcitabine resistance (2 , 10, 11, 12, 13) . These observations were based mainly on studies performed on Ara-C-resistant clones. Because gemcitabine has different targets than Ara-C, the resistance mechanisms to gemcitabine may differ from those to Ara-C. Moreover, because gemcitabine targets RR as a mechanism of cytotoxicity, we believe the alteration of RR may play a role in gemcitabine resistance. In this study, gemcitabine resistance in a human oropharyngeal cancer KB cell line was induced, and the expressions of RR and DCK were analyzed. The molecular properties of the gemcitabine-resistant clones confirmed our hypothesis.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Cells.
Human oropharyngeal carcinoma KB cells (American Tissue Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) were incubated in plastic tissue culture plates in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 5% CO2 and 37°C. HU-resistant clones (HURS) were incubated and maintained in the presence of 1 mM HU as a control for this study. A gemcitabine-resistant clone (KB-Gem) was selected from stepwise exposure to increasing concentrations of gemcitabine. This cloned cell line was selected and maintained in the presence of 8 µM gemcitabine.

IC50 Determination.
Cells in logarithmic growth were plated at a density of 25,000 cells/ml in 24-well plates to determine the effects of drugs delivered in varying dosages. Methylene blue assays were performed, and IC50 values were determined by interpolation of the plotted data to show the drug concentration that produced 50% cell death (14) .

Probes, Primers, and RT-PCR.
The human cDNA sequences of DCK and the M1 and M2 subunits of RR have been published (14 , 15) . To construct a probe of human DCK, we performed RT-PCR technique on total RNA taken from wild-type KB cells. Primers were designed from the cDNA sequences of two enzymes, as described previously (14 , 15) .

mRNA and Northern Blot Analyses.
Total RNA was extracted from logarithmically grown cells, as described previously. The RNA was electrophoresed in a formaldehyde-agarose gel and blotted onto a Hybond-N membrane (Amersham, Arlington, IL). Radioactive probes of DCK, M1, and M2 were prepared as described previously (14 , 15) . Hybridizations were performed under stringent conditions.

Protein and Western Blot Analyses.
Protein extracts were separated by 7.5% SDS-PAGE, loaded with equal amounts of protein. Following electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Life Sciences). Antirat M2 polyclonal and antimouse M1 monoclonal antibodies purchased from Accurate Chemical and Scientific Co. (Westbury, NY) were used for Western blot analysis (14 , 15) .

RR Enzyme Assay.
RR activity was measured using the [14C]CDP-assay method published previously (16 , 17) . The assay mixture had a final volume of 75 µl. The [14C]CDP was converted to [14C] dCDP by RR. The incubation time for the reaction was 20 min. The amount of [14C]dCDP was determined after enzymatic dephosphorylation by high-performance liquid chromatography with the use of a C18 ion exchange column.

Determination of dNTP Pools.
This assay was conducted according to a previously described method (16) . The total reaction volume was 50 µl. The mixture was allowed to react at room temperature for 20 min. After incubation, 40-µl aliquots were spotted onto Whatman DE81 paper. After adequate washing, tritium-labeled dNTPs were counted by a liquid scintillation counter.

DCK Enzyme Assay.
Enzyme activity was measured according to a procedure derived from the protocol of Ivies et al. (18) . Cell extracts were prepared with a cold DCK buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0). The protein contents of the cell extracts were measured with the Bio-Rad Bradford protein assay (19) . In each assay, the reaction substrate mixture was combined with an equal volume of enzyme. The final concentrations of the DCK assay components were: 10 mM ATP, 10 mM MgCl2, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.02 mM [3H]CdR, and 15 mM NaF. This reaction mixture was incubated for 30 min at 37°C. The reaction was terminated by heating in a boiling water bath for 2 min. Adequate aliquots were pipetted onto DE-81 paper discs and allowed to stand for 10 min at room temperature. The discs were washed twice with 1 mM ammonium formate for 20 min each. Then the radioactive discs were placed into counting vials, and 1-ml aliquots of 0.1 M HCl-0.2 M KCl were added to elute labeled nucleotides from the discs. After elution, 5 ml of trito-toluene scintillation solvent were added into each vial. The samples were counted in a Beckman LS-100 scintillation counter (18 , 19) .

DCK cDNA Analysis by PCR.
Total RNAs were extracted from the KB wild-type, KB-Gem, and HURS cell lines. RT-PCR was used to yield the cDNAs of all three cell lines. The cDNA products of all cell lines were then cloned with a general contractor DNA cloning system (5 Prime->3 Prime, Inc.). After the cloned DNAs were purified, the cDNAs were sequenced at the Sequencing Facility Laboratory of the City of Hope National Medical Center (Duarte, CA).


    Results
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Establishment of a KB Gemcitabine-resistant Clone.
Resistance to gemcitabine was successfully induced in the human oropharyngeal epidermoid carcinoma KB cell line via stepwise exposure to increasing concentrations of dFdCyd. The sensitivities of the KB wild-type, HURS, and KB-Gem cells to gemcitabine, HU, and Ara-C are shown in Table 1Citation . The IC50s of gemcitabine for KB wild-type, HURS, and KB-Gem clone were 0.3, 32.3, and 44.8 µM, respectively. The KB-Gem clone was cross-resistant to both HU and Ara-C, although the clone was 5-fold more resistant to HU and 150-fold more resistant to Ara-C than the KB wild-type (Table 1)Citation . The HURS clone was used as a control and demonstrated the same range of resistance to HU, as reported previously.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Effects of gemcitabine, HU, and Ara-C on KB-Gem clones

 
Molecular Characterization of RR Expression in the KB-Gem Clone.
Total RNA was extracted from each cell line and analyzed via Northern blot to detect M1 and M2 mRNA expressions. The cDNA probes of M1 and M2 were prepared as reported previously. ß-Actin was studied as an internal control.

The Northern blot of M1 and M2 mRNA expressions is shown in Fig. 1aCitation . A 3.3-kb RNA was detected with the M1 probe, and 3.4- and 1.6-kb RNAs were detected with the M2 probe. Overall, there was no significant difference in M1 mRNA expression among the KB-Gem clone, HURS clone, and KB wild-type. The expression of M2 mRNA was higher in the KB-Gem and HURS clones than it was in the KB wild-type. The quantitative data were summarized from the means of the data gathered from the three experiments and are shown in Table 2Citation . KB-Gem demonstrated a level of M2 mRNA expression that was 9-fold higher than that of the KB wild-type. The M2 mRNA expression in HURS clone increased 10-fold, as reported previously. To determine the M1 and M2 protein quantities of the KB-Gem clone, we extracted equal amounts of total protein from the KB wild-type and HURS and KB-Gem clones and analyzed them via Western blot (Fig. 1b)Citation . The molecular weight of the M2 protein was 88,000, and that of the M1 was 85,000 (monomer). The M1 proteins from each cell demonstrated equal levels of expression (data not shown). The M2 protein in the KB-Gem clone and HURS showed 2- and 3-fold increases, respectively, as compared with the wild-type cells. The relative quantitative results from the means of the three experiments are summarized in Table 2Citation .



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. a, Northern blot of KB-Gem clone, HURS clone, and KB wild-type cells. Twenty µg of total RNA were isolated from all cell lines. Blots were hybridized with random-primed 32P-labeled RR M1 or M2 full-length cDNA probe. b, Western blot of protein extracts from the cells with M2 antibodies. Crude cell extracts (30 µg of protein) were loaded in each lane. The M2 subunit is represented by the 44,000 band (monomer of subunit).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Molecular characterization of RR expression in the KB-Gem clonea

 
Determination of RR Enzyme Activity and dNTP Pools.
The crude RR enzyme extracts from the KB wild-type and KB-Gem and HURS clones were studied to confirm enzyme activity. Table 3Citation shows the relative ratios of the RR activities of the cell lines. The RR activity of the KB-Gem clone was 2.3-fold higher than the RR activity of KB wild-type cell lines. The HURS clone exhibited a 6-fold elevated level of RR, comparable with data from previous reports. The concentrations of dNTP pools were calculated in pmol per 1 million cells and were presented as relative ratios in which KB-Gem was compared with the KB wild-type cells. The dTTP and dGTP pools revealed no significant changes and are not shown in this study. The dATP and dCTP pools of each cell line are shown in Table 3Citation . The results reveal that the dATP pool of KB-Gem cell line was 2-fold higher than that of the KB parental cell line. The dCTP pool of the KB-Gem clone was 2-fold higher than that of the parental cell line. The HURS clone demonstrated a 7-fold increase in dATP and a 15-fold increase in dCTP over that of the KB wild-type. This remarkable increase has been reported previously.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Relative changes in RR activity and dNTP pools in the KB-Gem clone

 
Molecular Characterization of DCK Expression in KB-Gem Clone.
To test whether a gemcitabine resistant phenotype of a KB-Gem clone is associated with DCK deficiency or mutation, we performed molecular characterization tests.

A Northern blot was used with a DCK probe that was obtained from the RT-PCR products of total RNAs. The DCK probe detected a 1.5-kb RNA band. The results from the Northern blot of DCK mRNA are shown in Fig. 2aCitation and reveal no difference in the expressions of DCK mRNA among the three cell lines. Primers were designed, and RT-PCR was used to study further the DCK cDNA sequences of the KB-Gem clone and KB wild-type cells (Fig. 2b)Citation . Full-length cDNAs from KB parental cells and the KB-Gem clone were sequenced, revealing 375A->G and 755A->G point mutations in the KB-Gem clone, as compared with the KB parental cells. These mutation sites were confirmed in three experiments and were not the results of PCR artifact. However, there were no changes in the amino acids (Thr and Gln, respectively).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. a, Northern blot of total RNA (20 µg) isolated from each cell. Blots were hybridized with random-primed 32P-labeled DCK full-length cDNA probes. b, comparison of amino acid sequence and cDNA sequences of DCK in KB-Gem clone and KB wild-type.

 
DCK Activity of KB-Gem Clone.
The crude enzyme extracts from KB-Gem, HURS clones, and KB wild-type were studied. The DCK activity of the KB-Gem clone was 56% of that of the KB parental cells. The DCK activity of the HURS clone was 43% of the parental KB cells (Fig. 3a)Citation . Crude extracted proteins were then passed through a G-25 column to remove the endogenous dNTP pools. The results are shown in Fig. 3bCitation . DCK enzyme activities were relatively similar among the three cell lines.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. a, DCK enzyme activity in KB-Gem, HURS clone, and KB wild-type cells in a crude extraction study. b, DCK enzyme activity after G-25 column purification.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
The mechanism of resistance to gemcitabine was previously believed to have been based on a mutation or deficiency of DCK (10) . These observations resulted from studies performed on Ara-C-resistant clones (11, 12, 13) . The first acquired gemcitabine resistant cell line was reported by Ruiz van Haperen et al. (10) . They showed that their gemcitabine-resistant cell line was cross-resistant not only to Ara-C but also to several other unrelated anticancer agents (10) . Their findings suggested that low DCK activity plays an important role in the mechanism of gemcitabine resistance. Whether DCK deficiency is secondary to inhibition by a dNTP pool or simply a partial mechanism of a larger process remained undetermined. Moreover, studies of the murine colon 26-A cell in animal models have failed to show that DCK deficiency is the mechanism of gemcitabine resistance. In these studies, thymidine kinase or other enzymes were suggested as the mechanisms of gemcitabine resistance (20) . Because gemcitabine targets RR, we hypothesized that the resistance mechanism may be based on RR alteration.

Our current findings support the possibility that increased RR activity plays an important role in the mechanism of gemcitabine resistance of the KB-Gem clone (Fig. 4)Citation . Still, other mechanisms of gemcitabine resistance should be considered, such as: increased deoxycytidine deaminase levels, which metabolize the gemcitabine; increased CTP synthetase, which increases endogenous CTP pools; and further alterations of the binding site of the DNA polymerase (10) . Other resistance phenotypes, such as decreased membrane transport or altered DNA excision/repair, also need to be considered (10) .



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. a, the schematic diagram of the metabolism of gemcitabine (modified from Peters et al. Semin. Oncol., 23: 16–24, 1996). b, the hypothesis of the role of ribonucleotide reductase in gemcitabine resistance.

 
In this study, the HURS clone was used as a positive control. The characteristics of our HURS clone was thoroughly reported in a previous paper (6 , 14, 15, 16) . Interestingly, the M2 mRNA expression of the KB-Gem clone was 9-fold higher than that of the KB wild-type cells, but with only a 2-fold increase in M2 protein. This phenomenon has been demonstrated in the HURS clone as well. This finding suggests that posttranslational and posttranscriptional regulation may play a role in the RR expression of the KB-Gem clone. Therefore, the KB-Gem clone may be a useful tool in studying the regulation of RR expression.

In summary, we reported the overexpression of RR but not DCK as a mechanism of resistance to gemcitabine. Increased RR activity expands the size of the dNTP pools, which competitively inhibits the incorporation of dFdCTP into DNA. The expanded dNTP pools further down-regulate the activity of DCK via negative feedback pathways, reducing the phosphorylation of gemcitabine. Finally, excess dCTP may be a positive feedback mechanism of dCMP deaminase that results in increased gemcitabine metabolism. However, other mechanisms may be involved, and further study is required.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by NIH Grant CA 72767-01. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010-3000. Phone: (626) 359-8111 ext. 2867; Fax: (626) 301-8233; E-mail: yyen{at}coh.org Back

3 The abbreviations used are: dFdCyd, 2,2-difluorodeoxycytidine; Ara-C, cytarabine; DCK, deoxycytidine kinase; RR, ribonucleotide reductase; HU, hydroxyurea; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-PCR. Back

Received 5/21/99. Accepted 7/19/99.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Guchelaar H. J., Richel D. J., van Knapen A. Clinical, toxicological and pharmacological aspects of gemcitabine. Cancer Treat. Rev., 22: 15-31, 1983.
  2. Plunkett W., Huang P., Xu Y. Z., Heinemann V., Grunewald R., Gandhi V. Gemcitabine: metabolism, mechanisms of action, and self-potentiation. Semin. Oncol., 22 (Suppl. 11): 3-10, 1995.[Medline]
  3. Heinemann V., Hertel L. W., Grindey G. B., Plunkett W. Comparison of the cellular pharmacokinetics and toxicity of 2,2-difluorodeoxycytidine and 1-ß -D-arabinofuranosylcytosine. Cancer Res., 48: 4024-4031, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Cory J. G., Sato A. Regulation of ribonucleotide reductase activity in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biochem., 53: 257-266, 1983.
  5. Thelander L., Berg P. Isolation and characterization of expressible cDNA clones encoding the M1 and M2 subunits of mouse ribonucleotide reductase. Mol. Cell. Biol., 6: 3433-3422, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Zhou B. S., Tsai P., Ker R., Tsai J., Ho R., Yu J., Shih J., Yen Y. Overexpression of transfected human ribonucleotide reductase M2 subunit in human cancer cells enhance their invasion potential. Clin. Exp. Metastasis, 16: 43-49, 1998.[Medline]
  7. Fan H., Villegas C., Wright J. A. Ribonucleotide reductase R2 component is a novel malignancy determination that cooperates with activated oncogenes to determine transformation and malignant potential. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93: 14036-14040, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Hertel L. W., Boder G. B., Kroin J. S., Rinzel S. M., Poore G. A., Todd G. C., Grindey G. B. Evaluation of the antitumor activity of gemcitabine (2,2-difluoro-2-deoxycytidine). Cancer Res., 50: 4417-4422, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Braakhuis B. J. M., Van Dongen G. A. M. S., Vermorken J. B., Snow G. B. Preclinical in vivo activity of 2,2-difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine) against human head and neck cancer. Cancer Res., 51: 211-214, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ruiz van Haperen V. W. T., Veerman G., Eriksson S., Boven E., Stegmann A. P. A., Hermsen M., Vermorken J. B., Pinedo H. M., Peters G. J. Development and molecular characterization of a 2, 2-difluorodeoxycytidine resistant variant of the human ovarian carcinoma cell line A2780. Cancer Res., 54: 4138-4143, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Bhalla K., Nayak R., Grant S. Isolation and characterization of a deoxycytidine kinase-deficient human promyelocytic leukemic cell line highly resistant to 1-ß -D-arabinofuranosylcytosine. Cancer Res., 44: 5029-5037, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Wiley J. S., Jones S. P., Sawyer W. H., Paterson A. R. P. 1-ß-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine influx and nucleoside transport sites in acute leukemia. J. Clin. Invest., 69: 479-489, 1982.
  13. Chan T. C. K. Augmentation of 1-ß-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine cytotoxicity in human tumor cells by inhibiting drug efflux. Cancer Res., 49: 2656-2660, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Yen Y., Grill S. P., Dutschman G. E., Chang C. N., Zhou B. S., Cheng Y. C. Characterization of a hydroxyurea-resistant human KB cell line with supersensitivity to 6-thioguanine. Cancer Res., 54: 3686-3691, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Zhou B. S., Hsu N. Y., Pan B. C., Doroshow J. H., Yen Y. Overexpression of ribonucleotide reductase in transfected human KB cells increases their resistance to hydroxyurea: M2 but not M1 is sufficient to increase resistance to hydroxyurea in transfected cells. Cancer Res., 55: 1328-1333, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Zhou B. S., Ker R., Ho R., Yu J., Zhao Y. R., Shih J., Yen Y. Determination of deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate pool size in ribonucleotide reductase cDNA transfected human KB cells. Biochem. Pharmacol., 55: 1657-1665, 1998.[Medline]
  17. Steeper J. P., Stuart C. D. A rapid assay for CDP reductase activity in mammalian cell extracts. Anal. Biochem., 34: 123-130, 1970.[Medline]
  18. Ivies D. H., Durhan J. P., Tucker V. S. Rapid determination of nucleoside kinase and nucleotidase activities with tritium-labeled substrates. Anal. Biochem., 28: 192-205, 1968.
  19. Bradford M. A. A rapid and sensitive method for the qualification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem., 72: 248-254, 1976.[Medline]
  20. Ruiz van Haperen V. M. T., Veerman G., van Moorsel C. T. A., Peters G. J. Induction of in vivo resistance against gemcitabine. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 431: 637-640, 1998.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
S. Y. Rha, H. C. Jeung, Y. H. Choi, W. I. Yang, J. H. Yoo, B. S. Kim, J. K. Roh, and H. C. Chung
An Association Between RRM1 Haplotype and Gemcitabine-Induced Neutropenia in Breast Cancer Patients
Oncologist, June 1, 2007; 12(6): 622 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
P Ceppi, M Volante, S Novello, I Rapa, K. Danenberg, P. Danenberg, A Cambieri, G Selvaggi, S Saviozzi, R Calogero, et al.
ERCC1 and RRM1 gene expressions but not EGFR are predictive of shorter survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with cisplatin and gemcitabine
Ann. Onc., December 1, 2006; 17(12): 1818 - 1825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
T. Oguri, H. Achiwa, S. Sato, Y. Bessho, Y. Takano, M. Miyazaki, H. Muramatsu, H. Maeda, T. Niimi, and R. Ueda
The determinants of sensitivity and acquired resistance to gemcitabine differ in non-small cell lung cancer: a role of ABCC5 in gemcitabine sensitivity.
Mol. Cancer Ther., July 1, 2006; 5(7): 1800 - 1806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
E. Giovannetti, V. Mey, S. Nannizzi, G. Pasqualetti, M. Del Tacca, and R. Danesi
Pharmacogenetics of anticancer drug sensitivity in pancreatic cancer.
Mol. Cancer Ther., June 1, 2006; 5(6): 1387 - 1395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. Giovannetti, M. Del Tacca, V. Mey, N. Funel, S. Nannizzi, S. Ricci, C. Orlandini, U. Boggi, D. Campani, M. Del Chiaro, et al.
Transcription analysis of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 predicts survival in pancreas cancer patients treated with gemcitabine.
Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 66(7): 3928 - 3935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. Aghi, S. Rabkin, and R. L. Martuza
Effect of Chemotherapy-Induced DNA Repair on Oncolytic Herpes Simplex Viral Replication
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 4, 2006; 98(1): 38 - 50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. A. van de Wiel, J. L. Costa, K. Smid, C. B.M. Oudejans, A. M. Bergman, G. A. Meijer, G. J. Peters, and B. Ylstra
Expression Microarray Analysis and Oligo Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization of Acquired Gemcitabine Resistance in Mouse Colon Reveals Selection for Chromosomal Aberrations
Cancer Res., November 15, 2005; 65(22): 10208 - 10213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. M. Bergman, P. P. Eijk, V. W.T. Ruiz van Haperen, K. Smid, G. Veerman, I. Hubeek, P. van den IJssel, B. Ylstra, and G. J. Peters
In vivo Induction of Resistance to Gemcitabine Results in Increased Expression of Ribonucleotide Reductase Subunit M1 as the Major Determinant
Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 65(20): 9510 - 9516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
L. P. Jordheim, O. Guittet, M. Lepoivre, C. M. Galmarini, and C. Dumontet
Increased expression of the large subunit of ribonucleotide reductase is involved in resistance to gemcitabine in human mammary adenocarcinoma cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2005; 4(8): 1268 - 1276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
A. A. Desai, R. L. Schilsky, A. Young, L. Janisch, W. M. Stadler, N. J. Vogelzang, S. Cadden, J. A. Wright, and M. J. Ratain
A phase I study of antisense oligonucleotide GTI-2040 given by continuous intravenous infusion in patients with advanced solid tumors
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2005; 16(6): 958 - 965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Ogawa, H. Hori, T. Ohta, K. Onozato, M. Miyahara, and Y. Komada
Sensitivity to Gemcitabine and Its Metabolizing Enzymes in Neuroblastoma
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2005; 11(9): 3485 - 3493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Akada, T. Crnogorac-Jurcevic, S. Lattimore, P. Mahon, R. Lopes, M. Sunamura, S. Matsuno, and N. R. Lemoine
Intrinsic Chemoresistance to Gemcitabine Is Associated with Decreased Expression of BNIP3 in Pancreatic Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2005; 11(8): 3094 - 3101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. Rosell, E. Felip, M. Taron, J. Majo, P. Mendez, M. Sanchez-Ronco, C. Queralt, J. J. Sanchez, and J. Maestre
Gene Expression as a Predictive Marker of Outcome in Stage IIB-IIIA-IIIB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Induction Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy Followed By Resectional Surgery
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2004; 10(12): 4215S - 4219S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Grant and P. Dent
Kinase Inhibitors and Cytotoxic Drug Resistance
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2004; 10(7): 2205 - 2207.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. S. Duxbury, H. Ito, M. J. Zinner, S. W. Ashley, and E. E. Whang
Inhibition of Src Tyrosine Kinase Impairs Inherent and Acquired Gemcitabine Resistance in Human Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Cells
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2004; 10(7): 2307 - 2318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. Rosell, K. D. Danenberg, V. Alberola, G. Bepler, J. J. Sanchez, C. Camps, M. Provencio, D. Isla, M. Taron, P. Diz, et al.
Ribonucleotide Reductase Messenger RNA Expression and Survival in Gemcitabine/Cisplatin-Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2004; 10(4): 1318 - 1325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Shao, B. Zhou, L. Zhu, W. Qiu, Y.-C. Yuan, B. Xi, and Y. Yen
In Vitro Characterization of Enzymatic Properties and Inhibition of the p53R2 Subunit of Human Ribonucleotide Reductase
Cancer Res., January 1, 2004; 64(1): 1 - 6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Yen
Ribonucleotide Reductase Subunit One as Gene Therapy Target: Commentary re: M-Y. Cao et al., Adenovirus-mediated Ribonucleotide Reductase R1 Gene Therapy of Human Colon Adenocarcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res., 9: 4304-4308, 2003.
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2003; 9(12): 4304 - 4308.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. Murren, M. Modiano, C. Clairmont, P. Lambert, N. Savaraj, T. Doyle, and M. Sznol
Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Triapine, a Potent Ribonucleotide Reductase Inhibitor, Administered Daily for Five Days in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2003; 9(11): 4092 - 4100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Lee, A. Vassilakos, N. Feng, V. Lam, H. Xie, M. Wang, H. Jin, K. Xiong, C. Liu, J. Wright, et al.
GTI-2040, an Antisense Agent Targeting the Small Subunit Component (R2) of Human Ribonucleotide Reductase, Shows Potent Antitumor Activity against a Variety of Tumors
Cancer Res., June 1, 2003; 63(11): 2802 - 2811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
L. Xue, B. Zhou, X. Liu, W. Qiu, Z. Jin, and Y. Yen
Wild-Type p53 Regulates Human Ribonucleotide Reductase by Protein-Protein Interaction with p53R2 as well as hRRM2 Subunits
Cancer Res., March 1, 2003; 63(5): 980 - 986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. K. Nowak, B. W. S. Robinson, and R. A. Lake
Gemcitabine Exerts a Selective Effect on the Humoral Immune Response: Implications for Combination Chemo-immunotherapy
Cancer Res., April 1, 2002; 62(8): 2353 - 2358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. B. Matranga and G. I. Shapiro
Selective Sensitization of Transformed Cells to Flavopiridol-induced Apoptosis following Recruitment to S-Phase
Cancer Res., March 1, 2002; 62(6): 1707 - 1717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. P. Jung, M. V. Motwani, and G. K. Schwartz
Flavopiridol Increases Sensitization to Gemcitabine in Human Gastrointestinal Cancer Cell Lines and Correlates with Down-Regulation of Ribonucleotide Reductase M2 Subunit
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2001; 7(8): 2527 - 2536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goan, Y.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Yen, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goan, Y.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Yen, Y.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation