| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics |
Departments of Clinical Investigation and Leukemia [V.G.], The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, and The Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas 77030
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Metabolically, nucleoside analogues, including ara-G, must be phosphorylated to their triphosphate forms to exert cytotoxicity (4 , 5) . Nucleoside analogue triphosphates then compete with native deoxynucleotides for incorporation into DNA. Once incorporated, the fraudulent nucleoside monophosphate stops DNA synthesis and causes cell death, usually by apoptosis. This incorporation into DNA and subsequent apoptosis is essential for the cytotoxic actions of clinically tested and effective nucleoside analogues, such as gemcitabine (6) , cytarabine (7) , fludarabine (8 , 9) , and cladribine (10) . However, how ara-G and ara-GTP kill cells remains speculative.
In contrast to other nucleoside analogues but similar to deoxyguanosine, ara-G appears to be selectively toxic to immature T cells (4 , 11, 12, 13) . This has been demonstrated in cell lines (4 , 12 , 13) , freshly isolated leukemia cells (14) , and leukemia cells from patients treated with 506U78 (2) , the prodrug of ara-G (1) . B-Lymphoblastoid and myeloid lineage cells, on the other hand, did not respond to ara-G during in vitro incubations (13 , 14) or in the clinic with 506U78 therapy (2 , 3) . The exact mechanism for this differential sensitivity is not known, but it has been postulated that immature T-cells have biochemical properties that result in increased accumulation and decreased elimination of ara-GTP (4 , 12 , 13) .
We hypothesized that, in immature T-lymphoblasts, the mechanism of action of ara-G, like other purine and pyrimidine analogues, is directly related to its incorporation into DNA. Specifically, the incorporation of ara-GTP may result in chain termination and the cessation of DNA synthesis, which may, in turn, trigger the signaling pathways involved in the execution of apoptosis. Hence, if the incorporation of ara-GMP into DNA were prevented, the apoptosis program would not be triggered, despite the presence of intracellular ara-GTP. Our study tested this hypothesis in an experimental system in which T cells are allowed to accumulate intracellular ara-GTP but incorporation into DNA is prohibited.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Culture.
CCRF-CEM cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). The cells were cultured in RPMI supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY) and maintained at 37°C in 5% CO2 in a fully humidified incubator. The cell doubling time was 24 h under these conditions. Cells were routinely tested for Mycoplasma by using a commercially available kit and following the manufacturers recommendations (Gen-Probe Inc., San Diego, CA).
Cell Synchronization and Experimental Plan.
The cells were synchronized by double aphidicolin block, as described previously (9)
. Briefly, CCRF-CEM cells were incubated with 2 µM aphidicolin for 24 h, washed, and incubated in fresh aphidicolin-free medium for 12 h and then incubated with 2 µM aphidicolin for an additional 24 h. This 60-h double-aphidicolin treatment blocked the cells at the G1-S boundary (Fig. 1)
. These synchronized cells were then washed and resuspended in either fresh medium without aphidicolin for cell cycle progression or fresh medium containing 2 µM aphidicolin for continued inhibition of DNA synthesis. The latter cultures that were incubated continuously with aphidicolin served as controls, and the first time point was designated Pre. The first time point for the other culture, which was released from aphidicolin block was designated 0 h. As shown in Fig. 1
, at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 h, aliquots of cells were taken from both these cultures. These cells were analyzed for various end points without any further treatment or after a 3-h incubation with 100 µM ara-G (Fig. 1)
. Preliminary experiments demonstrated that this concentration of aphidicolin used for synchronization of cells was not cytotoxic, even after 48 h of continuous incubation (9)
.
|
Measurement of Intracellular Nucleoside Triphosphates by HPLC.
To quantitate ara-GTP accumulation, we incubated exponentially growing CEM cells with 100 µM ara-G for the indicated times. This concentration was chosen because our recent Phase I trial indicated that at the maximally tolerated dose of the ara-G prodrug 506U78, the median peak level of ara-G in plasma was
100 µM (2)
. After incubation with ara-G, aliquots of cells (5 x 106-1 x 107) were removed at various times. Table 1
shows data from cells that were synchronized as described above (Fig. 1)
and then incubated with 100 µM ara-G. Nucleotides were extracted with perchloric acid, neutralized with KOH, and stored at -20°C until analysis. The neutralized extracts were applied to a 10-SAX Partisil anion exchange column (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA) and eluted at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min with a 50-min concave gradient (curve 8, Alliance HPLC equipped with a model 486 variable wavelength absorbance detector and Millenium software; Waters) from 60% 5 mM NH4H2PO4 (pH 2.8) plus 40% 0.75 M NH4H2PO4 (pH 3.6) to 100% 0.75 M NH4H2PO4 (pH 3.6). The column eluate was monitored for UV absorption at 256 nm, and the nucleoside triphosphates were quantitated by electronic integration with reference to external standards. ara-GTP was identified by comparing its retention profile and its absorption spectrum with that of the authentic sample. The intracellular concentrations of ribonucleotides and ara-GTP in the extracts were calculated from a given number of cells of a determined mean volume (Coulter Channelyzer; Coulter Electronics). This calculation assumes that these nucleotides are uniformly distributed in total cell volume. The lower limit of sensitivity of this assay is 10 pmol in an extract of 5 x 106 cells, corresponding to a cellular concentration of 1 µM.
|
Determination of ara-GMP Incorporation into DNA.
The cells were synchronized as described above (Fig. 1)
and then incubated with 100 µM [8,3H]ara-G for 3 h. After the incubation, the cells were pelleted, washed twice with ice-cold PBS, resuspended in lysis buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 10 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS, and 2 mg/ml proteinase K], and incubated at 65°C overnight. The nucleic acids were extracted with one volume of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1, v/v/v) and then precipitated in three volumes of 100% ice-cold ethanol. The nucleic acid pellet was washed twice with 70% ethanol, allowed to air-dry, and then resuspended in water. Contaminating RNA was digested with DNase-free RNase (2 µg/ml) for 2 h at 65°C. The DNA was extracted, precipitated with ethanol, washed, and finally resuspended in water as described above. The concentration (µg/ml) and purity (A260 nm:A280 nm ratio) of the DNA in solution was determined with an Ultraspec 3000 spectrophotometer (Pharmacia Biotech, Cambridge, England). In all cases, the A260 nm:A280 nm value was greater than 1.9. The amount of ara-GMP incorporated into DNA was determined by scintillation counting (Packard Instrument Co., Meriden, CT).
High Molecular Weight DNA Fragmentation.
Cells were prelabeled with [14C]thymidine as described above. At various times after release from aphidicolin, [14C]thymidine-prelabeled cells were incubated with 100 µM ara-G for 3 h. The cells were then embedded in 0.6% agarose plugs [75 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, and 5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8)]. The agarose plugs were allowed to solidify at room temperature for 5 min and then incubated overnight at 45°C in plug lysis buffer [1% sarkosyl, 50 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8), and 0.2 mg/ml proteinase K]. The agarose plugs were analyzed by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (CHEF-DR II; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA) at 200 V with an initial switch time of 50 s and a final switch time of 100 s for 16 h at 7°C in 0.5x TBE. The gel was stained with ethidium bromide and photographed. The radioactivity associated with the
50-kb fragments was quantitated with a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) or Betascope 603 analyzer after the gel was dried at 60°C under vacuum as described previously (15)
. The results were normalized with respect to total radioactivity in each lane and expressed as a percentage of radioactivity associated with the high molecular weight DNA fragments in aphidicolin-blocked cells (Pre).
Cellular Morphology.
Aliquots of cultures (7 x 104 cells) were centrifuged onto glass slides using a Cytospin 2 (Shandon, Cambridge, England) fixed with methanol, and stained with Wright-Giemsa stain. Cellular morphology was examined by light microscopy with a Nikon H-III microscope. A minimum of 200 intact cells in randomly selected fields were scored by an investigator who was blinded to the experimental conditions. Cells were considered apoptotic if they displayed nuclear condensation and membrane blebbing.
Statistical Analysis.
All statistical analyses were performed with Microsoft Excel 97. All graphs, linear regression lines, and curves were generated with GraphPad Prism (Version 2.01) using formulas supplied by the manufacturer (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). Both programs were run on a Compaq personal computer using a Windows 95 platform.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Incorporation of ara-GTP into DNA.
Synchronized cells were incubated with 100 µM ara-G for 3 h in the presence of 2 µM aphidicolin (Pre; Table 1
). Because similar levels of intracellular ara-GTP accumulated in different phases of the cell cycle, in these same cultures, we analyzed the incorporation of ara-GMP into DNA (Table 1)
. We hypothesized that ara-GMP would be incorporated into DNA only during periods of DNA synthesis and that the greatest incorporation into DNA would occur in the cultures that had the most cells in S phase. After double aphidicolin block,
80% of the cells were at G1-S, and 9% of the synchronized population was in S phase. The level of DNA incorporation in this population maintained in the continuous presence of aphidicolin (Pre) was 5 ± 2 pmol ara-GMP/mg DNA after a 3-h incubation with 100 µM ara-G. Immediately after release from aphidicolin (time 0), there was little change in the population cell cycle distribution (8% S phase) or in the quantity of ara-GMP incorporated into DNA (8 ± 4 pmol ara-GMP/mg DNA) after a 3-h incubation with 100 µM ara-G. In contrast, when 80% of the cells had entered S phase (6 h), the level was 24 ± 4 pmol ara-GMP/mg DNA. Twelve h after release from aphidicolin, 20% of the cells remained in S phase, and the amount of ara-GMP incorporated into DNA was 3 ± 1 pmol ara-GMP/mg DNA. The quantity of ara-GMP incorporated into DNA was not different before (Pre), immediately after (0 h), or 12 h after release from double block (P > 0.05). In contrast, the quantity of ara-GMP incorporated into DNA was significantly different at 6 h after release (P < 0.001). These data demonstrate that the quantity of ara-GMP incorporated into DNA was maximal when the greatest number of cells were in S phase at the start of a 3-h incubation with ara-G.
Inhibition of DNA Synthesis by ara-G.
We hypothesized that incorporation of ara-GMP into DNA would inhibit DNA synthesis and subsequently stimulate apoptosis. To test this postulate, we first measured the DNA synthesis in cells before and after a 3-h incubation with 100 µM ara-G, before and at various times after release from double aphidicolin block (Fig. 4)
. The cells began actively synthesizing DNA immediately after release from aphidicolin. The level of DNA synthesis peaked by 6 h, returned to baseline values by 9 h, remained at baseline levels until 18 h, and began to rise 24 h after release from aphidicolin (Fig. 4
,
). The changes in DNA synthesis levels (compared with the prerelease value) were significant at 3, 6, and 24 h (P = 0.001). In contrast, in cells maintained in the presence of aphidicolin, there was no significant change (P = 1.0) in the levels of DNA synthesis in the absence (Fig. 4
,
or presence (Fig. 4
,
) of ara-G at any time tested.
|
) and after (data not shown) a 3-h incubation with 100 µM ara-G at 0, 6, 12, and 24 h after release of cells from double aphidicolin block. Incubation of cells with ara-G in the absence of aphidicolin (released) reduced thymidine incorporation to background levels at all times tested. This was significantly lower than in the ara-G-untreated aphidicolin-released cells (Fig. 4
) at 6 and 24 h (P = 0.001).
To determine whether the inhibition of DNA synthesis by ara-G was directly dependent on the percentage of cells in S phase, we analyzed and plotted the data in Figs. 2
and 4
(Fig. 5A)
. There was a direct linear relationship between ara-GTP-mediated inhibition of DNA synthesis and number of cells in S phase (r = 0.94, P = 0.0001). Similarly, a strong linear relationship (r = 0.92, P = 0.0002) was observed between the number of molecules of ara-GMP incorporated into DNA and the percentage of S-phase cells in the population (Fig. 5B)
.
|
|
|
50-kb fragments (Fig. 6
) had basal levels of high molecular weight DNA fragmentation. This level was similar to that seen in cells incubated with aphidicolin alone (Fig. 6B
). These data suggested that, although cells had accumulated potentially lethal concentrations of ara-GTP (Table 1)
The changes in cellular morphology were consistent with the high molecular weight DNA fragmentation data (Fig. 7)
. Immediately after release from aphidicolin, the percentage of ara-G-treated cells with condensed chromatin, pyknotic nuclei, and membrane blebbing increased. The percentage of apoptotic cells peaked at 3 h (70 ± 5%), returned to baseline by 9 h, and began to increase again as the cells entered the next cell cycle (Fig. 7)
. These data clearly demonstrate that the cells most sensitive to the effects of ara-GTP were those actively synthesizing DNA. In contrast, the cells that contained ara-GTP but remained blocked by aphidicolin did not show morphological characteristics of apoptosis.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An additional manipulation in our experimental setting was the presence of aphidicolin during ara-GTP accumulation. To rule out the possibility that aphidicolin affected the accumulation of ara-GTP, we compared ara-GTP concentrations in cells incubated with and without aphidicolin. Whereas aphidicolin reversibly inhibits DNA polymerases (33)
, blocks DNA synthesis (Fig. 3)
, and reduces thymidine kinase activity (34)
, it has no known interactions with either dCK (34)
or dGK. As mentioned above, cell cycle perturbation by aphidicolin also did not affect ara-GTP accumulation. Consistent with these observations, our data (Fig. 3
and Table 1
) indicate that the presence of aphidicolin did not influence the accumulation of ara-GTP.
This study demonstrated that ara-G exerts its cytotoxic action by inducing apoptosis and that incorporation of ara-G into DNA is required for this action. For example, by inhibiting ara-G incorporation into DNA with aphidicolin, we were able to prevent high molecular weight DNA fragmentation and morphological changes characteristic of apoptosis, despite the presence of intracellular free analogue triphosphate (Figs. 6
and 7
). Therefore, the incorporation of ara-GMP into DNA appears to be the critical event in triggering apoptosis. Furthermore, these experiments appear to rule out alternative potentially toxic mechanisms of G-nucleotide action, which do not require DNA incorporation.
Several lines of evidence support this postulate. (a) Aphidicolin alone does not reduce clonogenic survival of CCRF-CEM cells, despite its ability to inhibit DNA synthesis (8)
. Therefore, it is clear that inhibition of DNA synthesis alone is not cytotoxic to CCRF-CEM cells. (b) When cells were coincubated with aphidicolin and ara-G, DNA synthesis was inhibited, and therefore, no analogue was incorporated into DNA. Under these experimental conditions, neither high molecular weight DNA fragmentation nor apoptotic morphology was observed. These results suggested that presence of toxic intracellular concentration of ara-GTP in the absence of ara-GMP incorporation into DNA was not sufficient to stimulate programmed cell death in CCRF-CEM cells. (c) In marked contrast to the previous two experimental conditions, when the cells were released from aphidicolin double block and then incubated with ara-G, they incorporated ara-GTP (Table 1)
. S-phase cells were most sensitive to the inhibition of DNA synthesis by ara-G and the induction of apoptosis. In this phase of the cell cycle, the cells actively synthesized DNA (Figs. 2
and 4
) and when treated with ara-G, they incorporated ara-GMP during DNA replication (Table 1)
. This is further substantiated by a strong linear relationship (r = 0.94; Fig. 5
) between the percentage of S-phase cells in the population and inhibition of DNA synthesis by ara-G. In addition, there was biochemical and morphological evidence that the maximum induction of apoptosis occurred when there was the maximum number of S-phase cells (Figs. 6
and 7
). Taken together, these observations demonstrate that intracellular ara-GTP incorporates into DNA, inhibits DNA synthesis, and induces programmed cell death.
Similar scenarios have been proposed for other nucleoside analogues such as gemcitabine (6) , cytarabine (7) , fludarabine (8) , and cladribine (10) . Unlike these analogues, however, it appears that in CCRF-CEM cells the actions of ara-G are directed only to DNA. Fludarabine, for example, has been shown to inhibit RNA synthesis (35) , and gemcitabine, fludarabine, and cladribine inhibit other targets, such as ribonucleotide reductase (36) . Inhibition of this enzyme perturbs DNA precursor pools (37) , which may subsequently inhibit DNA synthesis (6 , 8) . Even though cytarabine does not inhibit ribonucleotide reductase, other nonnuclear targets, such as the cell membrane, have been suggested for the biological effect of ara-CTP (38) . Although we do not rule out the possibility that ara-G or its phosphorylated metabolites interact with nonnuclear targets, our data suggest that, in CCRF-CEM cells, the cytotoxic actions of ara-GTP are induced only after its incorporation into DNA.
Ara-GTP competes effectively with its native nucleotide, dGTP, for incorporation into DNA (39)
. In a DNA primer extension assay system designed to model in vitro DNA synthesis by using purified DNA polymerase
, the Km values for incorporation into DNA for dGTP and ara-GTP were 0.02 and 0.2 µM, respectively (40)
. Although there is a 10-fold difference in Km values, ara-GTP is a good substrate for incorporation into DNA. In a calf thymus DNA assay system using either dATP (Km = 1 µM) or dGTP (Km = 2.9 µM) as substrates, the Ki values of ara-GTP were 20 and 0.5 µM, respectively (39)
. These results suggest that ara-GTP competes effectively with dGTP for incorporation into DNA. In whole CCRF-CEM cells, the dGTP concentration is <20 µM (26)
, whereas the ara-GTP concentration was
100 µM (Table 1)
. On the basis of the above kinetic values, we would expect efficient incorporation of ara-GTP into DNA and inhibition of DNA synthesis in CCRF-CEM cells, a conclusion that is consistent with our data (Fig. 3
and Table 1
). Once incorporated, ara-GTP behaves as a frank chain terminator (40)
. This was shown using an in vitro DNA primer extension assay and is due to the inability of DNA polymerase
to extend a primer with a 3'-terminal ara-GMP. This suggests that, in whole cells, ara-GTP incorporation may result in chain termination and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Experiments are underway to test this hypothesis by determining whether ara-G incorporation into DNA is internal or terminal in CCRF-CEM cells.
The cytotoxicity to leukemia cell lines and primary leukemia cells during in vitro incubation of other clinically relevant nucleoside analogues, such as cytarabine, has been related to the amount of analogue monophosphate incorporated into DNA (41) . An attempt was made to relate cytoreductiveness by formation of ara-C(DNA) during therapy of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (42) , but such a relationship could not be shown because of technical limitations. Our data from a recently published Phase I trial (3) demonstrated that the clinical response to 506U78 (the ara-G prodrug) is directly related to the intracellular accumulation of ara-GTP in circulating leukemia cells (2) . To evaluate whether the response to ara-G seen in the Phase I trial is directly related to the ara-GMP accumulation in DNA, it will be necessary to develop the technical capability to quantitate ara-GMP incorporation into the DNA of leukemia cells isolated from patients treated with ara-G prodrug. Presently, this goal has not been achieved; however, in an in vitro leukemia-cell model system, we found there was a direct relationship between the intracellular accumulation of ara-GTP and the amount of ara-GMP incorporated into DNA (43) . If a similar relationship exists in circulating leukemia cells during 506U78 therapy, then increased ara-GTP accumulation indirectly predicts incorporation of ara-GMP in DNA.
Phase I investigations of 506U78 in indolent leukemias established the clinical utility of ara-G in B-CLL diseases that were refractory to other purine analogues (44) . Because of the quiescent nature of these leukemia cells, other mechanisms of action, different from that proposed in the present study, may exist. Studies are underway to identify factor(s) that are involved in drug-induced apoptosis in these noncycling leukemia lymphocytes.
In conclusion, our data demonstrated that the accumulation of ara-GTP was cell cycle independent and was not affected by aphidicolin. During S phase, cells maximally incorporated ara-GMP molecules into DNA and were sensitive to ara-G-induced apoptosis. Furthermore, despite the presence of ara-GTP, cells in other phases of the cell cycle did not undergo apoptosis. Because our data demonstrated that the incorporation of ara-GTP into DNA is the critical event that mediates cytotoxicity, developing strategies to increase the incorporation of ara-GTP into DNA might increase the clinical utility of this promising new guanine nucleoside analogue.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 This work was supported in part by National Cancer Institute Grants CA 57629, CA 32839, and P30 CA16672 from the Department of Health and Human Services. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Clinical Investigation, Box 71, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: (713) 792-2989; Fax: (713) 794-4316; E-mail: vgandhi{at}notes.mdacc.tmc.edu ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: ara-G, 9-ß-D-arabinosylguanine; ara-GTP, ara-G triphosphate; ara-GMP, ara-G monophosphate; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; dCK, deoxycytidine kinase; dGK, deoxyguanosine kinase. ![]()
Received 5/ 4/99. Accepted 8/ 6/99.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. F Kisor Nelarabine: A Nucleoside Analog with Efficacy in T-Cell and Other Leukemias Ann. Pharmacother., June 1, 2005; 39(6): 1056 - 1063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. O. Rodriguez Jr, C. M. Stellrecht, and V. Gandhi Mechanisms for T-cell selective cytotoxicity of arabinosylguanine Blood, September 1, 2003; 102(5): 1842 - 1848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. O. Rodriguez Jr., B. S. Mitchell, M. Ayres, S. Eriksson, and V. Gandhi Arabinosylguanine Is Phosphorylated by Both Cytoplasmic Deoxycytidine Kinase and Mitochondrial Deoxyguanosine Kinase Cancer Res., June 1, 2002; 62(11): 3100 - 3105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Gandhi, W. Plunkett, S. Weller, M. Du, M. Ayres, C. O. Rodriguez Jr, P. Ramakrishna, G. L. Rosner, J. P. Hodge, S. O'Brien, et al. Evaluation of the Combination of Nelarabine and Fludarabine in Leukemias: Clinical Response, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics in Leukemia Cells J. Clin. Oncol., April 15, 2001; 19(8): 2142 - 2152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |