| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics |
Clinical Gene Therapy Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1851
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
15 months (2)
. Suicide/prodrug gene therapy holds great promise to become an important addition to the therapy of some forms of cancer. This strategy involves the transfer and expression of nonmammalian genes encoding enzymes that convert nontoxic prodrugs into cellular toxins. The most widely used suicide gene is HSV-tk,2 which confers sensitivity to GCV (3) .
Initially, replication-incompetent retroviral vectors have been used for viral-mediated HSV-tk gene delivery (4) . Subsequently, replication-deficient adenoviral vectors have been used as suicide gene transfer vectors (5 , 6) because they offer, in contrast to retroviral vectors, higher transduction efficiency and transgene expression in a wide variety of cell types independently of their cell cycle status. Because these vectors are replication incompetent, their use for cancer gene therapy is limited by their inability to spread and infect additional cells subsequent to the initial infection event. The fundamental physics of diffusion of vector particles in tissue spaces and the high density of viral receptors in tissue largely restrict distribution of these vectors only to the close proximity of the site of injection.
The presumed need to genetically modify every tumor cell may be partially obviated by the HSV-tk/GCV system because it is often associated with a "bystander effect" (3) , i.e., the extension of toxic effects to untransduced neighboring cells by diffusion of phosphorylated GCV through cellular gap junctions (7) . Although the bystander effect increases tumor cell killing, it is nonetheless necessary to transduce a significant proportion of the tumor. In an effort to increase transduction efficiency, intratumoral replication of viral vectors has been attempted by cotransfection of replication-defective viral constructs expressing HSV-tk with wild-type virus (8 , 9) or with viral genes critical for replication (10) . Also, direct inoculation of xenogenic murine retroviral producer cells into brain tumors (11) has been performed in an effort to achieve continuous local vector production.
Exploiting the oncolytic effects of viral replication, Bischoff et al. (12) demonstrated that an E1b Mr 55,000 deleted adenovirus preferentially replicates in p53 dysfunctional tumor cells (12) . This virus, which does not express a therapeutic transgene, has entered clinical trials in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (13) . To increase its efficacy and to be able to control the replication and spread of the virus, we and others have developed E1b Mr 55,000 deleted adenoviral vectors expressing HSV-tk (14) or a cytosine deaminase/HSV-tk fusion gene (15) .
Colorectal carcinoma has been evaluated as a potential target for HSV-tk/GCV suicide gene therapy (16, 17, 18) and appears to be an excellent tumor model for evaluation of the utility of an E1b attenuated replication competent vector because of the high prevalence of p53 abnormalities, especially in metastatic lesions (19 , 20) . In this report, we describe the use of an E1b Mr 55,000-deleted, replication-competent adenovirus expressing HSV-tk in combination with GCV for the treatment of colorectal carcinoma. We compared its efficacy with those of a standard replication-deficient adenovirus expressing HSV-tk and the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan (reviewed in Ref. 21) , which has shown significant antineoplastic activity against a variety of solid tumors including colorectal carcinoma.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For comparison, we generated the replication-deficient adenoviruses Ad.GFP and Ad.TK, which carry the GFP and the HSV-tk, respectively, driven by the CMV-IE promoter.
Tissue Culture.
The colon cancer cell lines SW-620, LS180, HCT 81, WiDr, HT-29, and DLD-1 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and propagated in DMEM (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Inc.) at 37°C and 5% CO2.
Flow Cytometric Analysis of GFP Expression.
To determine the in vitro transduction efficiency of human colon carcinoma cell lines with human adenovirus type 5, subconfluent cell monolayers were exposed to Ad.GFP at a MOI of 10. Sixty h later, single-cell suspensions were analyzed by flow cytometry (FACSCalibur; Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA).
HSV-tk Bystander Assay.
We evaluated the in vitro bystander effect of different colon cancer cell lines by coculturing mixtures of different ratios of Ad.TK transduced and untransduced cells as described previously (25)
.
The median fraction of affected cells (Fa) was calculated according to the formula:
![]() |
Colony-forming Assay.
To evaluate the sensitivity of HT-29 to topotecan, 1 million subconfluent HT-29 cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of topotecan for 24 h. After drug exposure, the cells were washed, trypsinized, and counted. To assess the colony-forming ability of the cells after the treatment, 300 cells were dispersed in 100-mm tissue culture plates and incubated at 37°C for 1014 days. Surviving colonies were fixed and stained with 1% crystal violet/formaldehyde, and colonies larger than 1 mm were counted. The fraction of unaffected cells (Fu) was calculated by dividing the number of colonies present in drug-treated dishes by the number present in untreated control dishes. The concentration effect curve is represented as the fraction of affected cells (Fa = 1- Fu) versus topotecan concentration. Each experiment was performed in triplicate and was repeated twice.
Animal Experiments.
Female athymic nu/nu mice (obtained from Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc., Indianapolis, IN) were s.c. injected with 10 million LS180 or HT-29 human colon cancer cells into the right dorsal lumbar region in 100 µl of serum-free DMEM with 10% Matrigel (Collaborative Products, Bedford, MA). Blinded, bidimensional tumor measurements were performed twice a week with calipers, and tumor volume was determined using the simplified formula of a rotational ellipsoid (l x w2x 0.5; Ref. 26
). Once tumors reached a volume of 100150 mm3, animals were treated by intratumoral injection of 109 plaque-forming units of adenovirus suspended in 100 µl of buffer or 100 µl of buffer alone as a control. Animals with tumor volumes outside this range were excluded from the study prior to any treatment. GCV (Roche Laboratories, Nutley, NJ) 100 mg/kg of body weight was administered i.p. in 1 ml of saline twice daily for 5 consecutive days beginning 1 day after virus inoculation, the optimal timing for the replication defective Ad.TK, or after 3 days when the intratumoral Ad.TKRC replication reached its maximum (data not shown). Topotecan treatment (1.5 mg/kg i.p. in 1 ml of saline once daily for 5 days) alone or in combination with Ad.TKRC was initiated at the same time as GCV in the other treatment groups. Prior toxicity studies demonstrated that the topotecan dosage used was moderately toxic but not lethal. Tumors were resected by a combination of sharp and blunt dissection 3 weeks after implantation in all treatment groups and weighed on an analytical scale.
Analytical and Statistical Methods.
The effect of the treatment on the tumor weight was analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test and the survival of the animals with the Cox-Mantel test using STATISTICA release 5.1 for Windows (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
40%, whereas a minimum of 85% was achieved in all other cell lines tested. The same cell lines were also evaluated for their HSV-tk-associated bystander effect. After transduction with Ad.TK, mixtures consisting of 10% or 50% HSV-tk-positive cells were incubated with 10 mM GCV for 24 h. All cell lines, with the exception of SW-620, exhibited a significant bystander effect. These findings demonstrate that cell lines originating from the same tumor tissue can vary with respect to both their susceptibility to adenoviral gene transfer and their HSV-tk/GCV-associated bystander effect. We chose LS 180 and HT-29 cells for our in vivo studies. HT-29 cells transduce with Ad5 approximately one-half as well as LS 180, but they had a somewhat greater metabolic bystander effect.
Antitumor Effect of Ad.TK or Ad.TKRC Treatment in Combination with GCV.
To assess the antitumor effect of Ad.TK and Ad.TKRC alone or in combination with GCV, we injected 109 plaque-forming units of virus directly into the LS 180 xenografts. GCV treatment was started 1 and 3 days after Ad.TK and Ad.TKRC injection, respectively. The tumors were resected in toto and weighed 3 days after completion of the GCV course in animals receiving Ad.TK and 1 day after completion in those receiving Ad.TKRC.
Analysis of the tumor masses revealed that the combination of either Ad.TK or Ad.TKRC with GCV increased the treatment efficacy (P
0.002; Fig. 1
). The antitumor effect of Ad.TKRC alone was equal to that of Ad.TK followed by GCV. This demonstrates that Ad.TKRC has direct oncolytic activity in LS 180 cells and confirms our previous observations in a survival study using melanoma and cervical cancer xenografts (14)
. The antitumor effect in mice treated with Ad.TKRC plus GCV was significantly superior to that of Ad.TK followed by GCV (P
0.001).
|
0.005; Fig. 3
0.0005). There was no statistically significant difference in survival whether Ad.TKRC was administered alone or in combination with topotecan. By contrast, when Ad.TKRC was followed by GCV, the survival of the animals was again significantly improved (P
0.02; Table 1
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our studies in the LS180 xenograft model revealed that there was no significant difference in the antitumor effect whether animals received the replication-deficient Ad.TK in combination with GCV or Ad.TKRC alone, confirming that replicating human adenovirus has intrinsic oncolytic activity (12 , 28) . In addition, in both the LS180 and HT-29 colon cancer models, treatment with Ad.TKRC in combination with GCV starting 3 days after virus injection showed the best antineoplastic effects.
Mice bearing HT-29 tumors treated with Ad.TKRC alone or in combination with GCV survived longer than animals treated with the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan. Topotecan is active against many colon carcinoma cell lines that are resistant to other frequently used antineoplastic agents. Preclinical drug screening models using athymic nude mice have shown that topotecan is the most active agent in HT-29 tumors (27) .
The results of the experiments described here confirm our previous results obtained in human melanoma and cervical cancer models, demonstrating that the combination of direct viral oncolysis together with an increase in suicide gene distribution within the tumor results in a significant improvement of treatment efficacy (14) . Furthermore, the addition of HSV-tk to the adenovirus also provides a safety mechanism that allows the viral infection to be aborted by GCV treatment should undesired spread of the infection occur during therapy.
Previous reports indicate that the binding of adenovirus E1a proteins to the cellular pRB and p300 proteins can induce quiescent cells to enter S-phase (29) and thereby conceivably increases susceptibility to S-phase-specific antineoplastic agents, like HSV-tk/GCV or topotecan (30) . Furthermore, adenovirus E1a increases topoisomerase levels (31 , 32) and thus potentially enhances the cytotoxicity of topoisomerase I inhibitors (33) . However, we did not observe an increased survival of animals treated with Ad.TKRC followed by topotecan administration relative to those receiving Ad.TKRC alone, suggesting that the inhibition of viral replication and oncolysis by topotecan (34, 35, 36) might have counterbalanced the potential increased cytotoxicity of topotecan. In contrast, despite abolition of viral replication by GCV, we demonstrated that the combination of direct viral oncolysis together with HSV-tk/GCV mediated cell killing resulted in a striking improvement of treatment efficacy. Indeed, this combination proved to be more efficacious than a standard replication-deficient adenovirus expressing HSV-tk, as well as a single treatment cycle with one of few antineoplastic agents active against HT-29 colon cancer, topotecan. It is tempting to speculate that the efficacy of cancer treatment could be enhanced by the combined use of standard chemotherapy and gene therapy. Studies are presently in progress to verify this hypothesis.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Clinical Gene Therapy Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, 10 Center Drive, Building 10, Room 10C103, Bethesda, MD 20892-1851. Phone: (301) 402-1833; Fax: (301) 496-7184; E-mail: owildner{at}nhgri.nih.gov ![]()
2 The abbreviations used are: HSV-tk, herpes simplex virus-1 thymidine kinase; GCV, ganciclovir; E1 and E3, adenovirus early regions 1 and 3, respectively; CMV-IE, cytomegalovirus immediate-early; GFP, green fluorescent protein; Ad5, wild-type human adenovirus type 5; MOI, multiplicity of infection. ![]()
Received 8/ 9/98. Accepted 11/11/98.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H.-J. Li, M. Everts, M. Yamamoto, D. T. Curiel, and H. R. Herschman Combined Transductional Untargeting/Retargeting and Transcriptional Restriction Enhances Adenovirus Gene Targeting and Therapy for Hepatic Colorectal Cancer Tumors Cancer Res., January 15, 2009; 69(2): 554 - 564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gros, J. Martinez-Quintanilla, C. Puig, S. Guedan, D. G. Mollevi, R. Alemany, and M. Cascallo Bioselection of a Gain of Function Mutation that Enhances Adenovirus 5 Release and Improves Its Antitumoral Potency Cancer Res., November 1, 2008; 68(21): 8928 - 8937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Kuruppu, A.-L. Brownell, A. Zhu, M. Yu, X. Wang, Y. Kulu, B. C. Fuchs, H. Kawasaki, and K. K. Tanabe Positron Emission Tomography of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Oncolysis Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 67(7): 3295 - 3300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Jogler, D. Hoffmann, D. Theegarten, T. Grunwald, K. Uberla, and O. Wildner Replication properties of human adenovirus in vivo and in cultures of primary cells from different animal species. J. Virol., April 1, 2006; 80(7): 3549 - 3558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-T. Lee, Y.-J. Lee, S.-Y. Kwon, J. Lee, K. I. Kim, K.-H. Park, J. H. Kang, C.-G. Yoo, Y. W. Kim, S. K. Han, et al. In vivo Imaging of Adenovirus Transduction and Enhanced Therapeutic Efficacy of Combination Therapy with Conditionally Replicating Adenovirus and Adenovirus-p27 Cancer Res., January 1, 2006; 66(1): 372 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Seo, M. Abei, M. Wakayama, K. Fukuda, H. Ugai, T. Murata, T. Todoroki, Y. Matsuzaki, N. Tanaka, H. Hamada, et al. Effective Gene Therapy of Biliary Tract Cancers by a Conditionally Replicative Adenovirus Expressing Uracil Phosphoribosyltransferase: Significance of Timing of 5-Fluorouracil Administration Cancer Res., January 15, 2005; 65(2): 546 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. O. Kirby, A. Rivera, D. Rein, M. Wang, I. Ulasov, M. Breidenbach, M. Kataram, J. L. Contreras, C. Krumdieck, M. Yamamoto, et al. A Novel Ex vivo Model System for Evaluation of Conditionally Replicative Adenoviruses Therapeutic Efficacy and Toxicity Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2004; 10(24): 8697 - 8703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-T. Lee, K.-H. Park, K. Yanagisawa, Y. Adachi, J. E. Ohm, S. Nadaf, M. M. Dikov, D. T. Curiel, and D. P. Carbone Combination Therapy with Conditionally Replicating Adenovirus and Replication Defective Adenovirus Cancer Res., September 15, 2004; 64(18): 6660 - 6665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Chu, D. E. Post, F. R. Khuri, and E. G. Van Meir Use of Replicating Oncolytic Adenoviruses in Combination Therapy for Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2004; 10(16): 5299 - 5312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Jounaidi and D. J. Waxman Use of Replication-Conditional Adenovirus as a Helper System to Enhance Delivery of P450 Prodrug-Activation Genes for Cancer Therapy Cancer Res., January 1, 2004; 64(1): 292 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Miyagawa, T. Oku, T. Sasajima, R. Dasai, B. Beattie, R. Finn, J. G. Tjuvajev, and R. Blasberg Assessment of Treatment Response by Autoradiography with 14C-Aminocyclopentane Carboxylic Acid, 67Ga-DTPA, and 18F-FDG in a Herpes Simplex Virus Thymidine Kinase/Ganciclovir Brain Tumor Model J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 1845 - 1854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Moon, Y. Oh, and J. A. Roth Current Status of Gene Therapy for Lung Cancer and Head and Neck Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2003; 9(14): 5055 - 5067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Fukuda, M. Abei, H. Ugai, E. Seo, M. Wakayama, T. Murata, T. Todoroki, N. Tanaka, H. Hamada, and K. K. Yokoyama E1A, E1B Double-restricted Adenovirus for Oncolytic Gene Therapy of Gallbladder Cancer Cancer Res., August 1, 2003; 63(15): 4434 - 4440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H Palmer, M.-J. Chen, and D. J Kerr Gene therapy for colorectal cancer Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2002; 64(1): 201 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Suzuki, R. Alemany, M. Yamamoto, and D. T. Curiel The Presence of the Adenovirus E3 Region Improves the Oncolytic Potency of Conditionally Replicative Adenoviruses Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2002; 8(11): 3348 - 3359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Nettelbeck, A. A. Rivera, C. Balague, R. Alemany, and D. T. Curiel Novel Oncolytic Adenoviruses Targeted to Melanoma: Specific Viral Replication and Cytolysis by Expression of E1A Mutants from the Tyrosinase Enhancer/Promoter Cancer Res., August 15, 2002; 62(16): 4663 - 4670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Barnes, C. J. Coolidge, A. Hemminki, R. D. Alvarez, and D. T. Curiel Conditionally Replicative Adenoviruses for Ovarian Cancer Therapy Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2002; 1(6): 435 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Mullen and K. K. Tanabe Viral Oncolysis Oncologist, April 1, 2002; 7(2): 106 - 119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. S. Haviv, K. Takayama, J. N. Glasgow, J. L. Blackwell, M. Wang, X. Lei, and D. T. Curiel A Model System for the Design of Armed Replicating Adenoviruses Using p53 as a Candidate Transgene Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2002; 1(5): 321 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. McCart, J. M. Ward, J. Lee, Y. Hu, H. R. Alexander, S. K. Libutti, B. Moss, and D. L. Bartlett Systemic Cancer Therapy with a Tumor-selective Vaccinia Virus Mutant Lacking Thymidine Kinase and Vaccinia Growth Factor Genes Cancer Res., December 1, 2001; 61(24): 8751 - 8757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Hu, J. Lee, J. A. McCart, H. Xu, B. Moss, H. R. Alexander, and D. L. Bartlett Yaba-Like Disease Virus: an Alternative Replicating Poxvirus Vector for Cancer Gene Therapy J. Virol., November 1, 2001; 75(21): 10300 - 10308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Xu and H. L. McLeod Strategies for Enzyme/Prodrug Cancer Therapy Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2001; 7(11): 3314 - 3324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Doronin, M. Kuppuswamy, K. Toth, A. E. Tollefson, P. Krajcsi, V. Krougliak, and W. S. M. Wold Tissue-Specific, Tumor-Selective, Replication-Competent Adenovirus Vector for Cancer Gene Therapy J. Virol., April 1, 2001; 75(7): 3314 - 3324. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. T. Curiel The Development of Conditionally Replicative Adenoviruses for Cancer Therapy Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2000; 6(9): 3395 - 3399. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
O. Wildner and J. C. Morris The Role of the E1B 55 kDa Gene Product in Oncolytic Adenoviral Vectors Expressing Herpes Simplex Virus-tk: Assessment of Antitumor Efficacy and Toxicity Cancer Res., August 1, 2000; 60(15): 4167 - 4174. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Doronin, K. Toth, M. Kuppuswamy, P. Ward, A. E. Tollefson, and W. S. M. Wold Tumor-Specific, Replication-Competent Adenovirus Vectors Overexpressing the Adenovirus Death Protein J. Virol., July 1, 2000; 74(13): 6147 - 6155. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Steele Recent Developments in the Virus Therapy of Cancer Experimental Biology and Medicine, February 1, 2000; 223(2): 118 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Morris Enzyme/Prodrug-Based Tumor Vaccination: All Politics (and Immunity) Are Local J Natl Cancer Inst, December 1, 1999; 91(23): 1986 - 1989. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zheng, M. Johansson, and A. Karlsson Retroviral Transduction of Cancer Cell Lines with the Gene Encoding Drosophila melanogaster Multisubstrate Deoxyribonucleoside Kinase J. Biol. Chem., December 8, 2000; 275(50): 39125 - 39129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |