| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Advances in Brief |
and Variant Isoforms in Human Breast Cancer1
Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030 [S. A. W. F., R. S., I. P., W. E. F.], and Departments of Molecular Sciences, Molecular Endocrinology and Medicinal Chemistry, Glaxo Wellcome Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-3398 [J-L. S., D. D. M., K. S-K., L. B. M., T. M. W., J. T. M.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
mRNA transcripts are expressed in human breast cancer cell lines and tumors. To complement the RNA expression studies, we have developed ER-
-specific antibodies to characterize ER-
protein expression in breast cancer cell lines and tumors. Monoclonal antibodies were made against a peptide representing the first 18 amino acids of the longest ER-
open reading frame reported to date, and polyclonal antibodies were made against a peptide within the ER-
B domain. By Western blot analysis, we show that ER-
protein is expressed in all cancer cell lines tested and in three of five breast tumor samples. The breast cancer cell lines showed variation in the size of the expressed ER-
protein. The longest form detected was consistent with the 530-amino acid, full-length ER-
sequence. Shorter ER-
isoforms were detected in the ER-
-negative MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-435 breast cancer cell lines, likely corresponding to previously described COOH-terminal RNA variant isoforms. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(3)
. More recently, ER-
has been shown to be expressed in breast tumors at the RNA level, and it has been suggested that changes in the relative levels of ER-
and ER-
might be associated with tumorigenesis (4
, 5)
. Thus, the accurate determination of ER-
expression is of clinical importance.
To make an accurate clinical assessment of ER status in breast cancer cells, it is critical to determine which forms of ER are expressed and stable at the protein level. Discrepancies exist in the size of the full-length human ER-
receptor. The first human cDNA sequence published reported a length of 487 amino acids (6)
. Ogawa et al. (7)
and Moore et al. (8)
subsequently published a human cDNA sequence with an additional 53 amino acids in the NH2-terminal region, predicting a primary translation product of 530 amino acid residues. Similarly, various sizes and isoforms of rat ER-
have been reported (9, 10, 11)
. Finally, the existence of numerous COOH-terminal-truncated ER-
isoforms (8)
, along with their potential to influence ER function (12)
, emphasizes the need to profile ER-
protein isoform expression in breast cancer samples as well. In this report, we provide the first characterization of ER-
expression at the protein level in breast cancer cells.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Antiserum.
residues 218 (amino acid numbering was based on the longest ER-
ORFs described to date; see Ref. 7
and 8
) and conjugation of peptide to KLH using m-maleimido-benzoic acid n-hydroxysuccinimide ester via the COOH-terminal cysteine were performed by ZENECA Inc. (Wilmington, DE). Hybridomas to the peptide were produced from a SJL mouse (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME) after 3 months of immunization with ER peptide-KLH conjugates using a previously published protocol (13)
. Hybridoma supernatants were screened for their immunoreactivity by ELISA, Western blotting, BIAcore analysis, and immunocytochemistry.4
Hybridoma ER15.64, secreting IgG1 immunologlobulins, was isolated after limiting dilution cloning and used for Western blot analysis.
For synthesis of polyclonal antiserum, another synthetic peptide, GNRCASPVTGPGSK (representing ER-
residues 130143), was synthesized. After linking to KLH via an introduced NH2-terminal cysteine residue, the conjugate was used to immunize rabbits. The polyclonal antiserum obtained was also used for Western blot analysis. Neither of these two antibodies recognized in vitro translated ER-
protein in Western blot experiments (data not shown).
Western Blot Analysis.
All breast cancer cell lines and the SaOS2 osteosarcoma cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. In addition, five ER-positive primary breast tumors from the San Antonio Breast Tumor Bank were examined. These five tumors were defined as ER positive (<3 fmol/mg receptor) using a ligand binding assay. Total cell or tumor lysates were prepared as described previously (14)
. Briefly, cell pellets were homogenized in a high-salt buffer [20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 2 mM DTT, 0.4 M KCl, and 20% glycerol] containing a mixture of protease inhibitors (2.5 µg/ml aprotinin, antipain, leupeptin, and pepstatin plus 0.3 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; Sigma). Homogenates were then centrifuged at 100,000 x g for 1 h, and the supernatants were stored at -20°C until use. Extract (50100 µg) was separated by electrophoresis on 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nylon membranes (Schleicher and Schuel, Keene, NH). The blots were first stained with StainAll Dye (Alpha Diagnostic International, Inc., San Antonio, TX) to confirm uniform transfer of all samples and then incubated in blocking solution (5% nonfat dry milk in TBST). After brief washes with TBST, the filters were then reacted with ER-
antibody at a dilution of 1:20 or 1:200 (monoclonal antibody ER 15-64) or 1:2,000 (polyclonal antiserum) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by extensive washes with TBST. Blots were then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Amersham) for 1 h, washed with TBST, and developed using the enhanced chemiluminescence procedure (Amersham). In some experiments, primary antibody was omitted, and secondary antibody was incubated alone to control for background immunostaining with the secondary antibody. As positive controls, mammalian expression vectors (pSG5) containing the complete ORFs of ER-
1 and ER-
2 (8)
were translated in vitro in a 50-µl rabbit reticulocyte translation reaction (Promega, Madison, WI), and 5 µl were analyzed by Western blotting.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Is Confirmed in MCF-7 Breast Carcinoma.
(14)
. Three in vitro translated controls were also included along with the MCF-7 extract in Western blot analysis (Fig. 1)
1 corresponds to the predicted 530-amino acid product (7
, 8)
, control ER-
2 is a COOH-terminal-truncated isoform (8)
, and control 5'-truncated corresponds to the originally reported human ER-
cDNA (6)
that contains an ORF that begins at amino acid 54 relative to ER-
1. Using a polyclonal antibody that was prepared using a peptide (residues 130143) within the B domain of ER-
, we found that in vitro translated ER-
1 migrated at approximately 5860 kDa under our Western blotting gel conditions, whereas both the ER-
2 and 5'-truncated controls migrated faster. The 5860 kDa size is consistent with the size predicted (62 kDa) from the sequence of the 530-amino acid form of the receptor. For each control reaction, the polyclonal antibody also recognized a smaller minor band. It is likely that the shorter translation product (in each case, approximately 45 kDa smaller than the primary band) represents initiation from an internal methionine. This is supported by the fact that the monoclonal ER 15-64, which was directed at the extreme NH2 terminus (the first 18 amino acids) of the predicted 530-residue ER-
(7
, 8)
does not recognize the shorter in vitro translation products (see below). When the polyclonal antibody was used to analyze MCF-7 cell extracts in Western blots, we detected one band migrating at the same position as the longest product in the ER-
1 in vitro translated control (Fig. 1A)
product in MCF-7 cells is the predicted 530-amino acid form. To further confirm the identity of this ER-
isoform in MCF-7 cells, we analyzed the MCF-7 extracts using monoclonal ER 15-64, an antibody specific to a stretch of amino acids present in ER-
1 and ER-
2, but not in the 5'-truncated sequence. As would be predicted, based on its specificity, ER 15-64 recognized specific products from in vitro translated ER-
1 and ER-
2, but not the 5'-truncated ER-
product (Fig. 1B)
1, the same size as the band recognized by the polyclonal antibody. Based on the antigen specificity of the antibodies and the size of the detected product, we conclude that MCF-7 cells express detectable levels of the 530-residue ER-
product.
|
Variants.
RNA variants have been reported that are potentially generated by differential splicing and differ in their COOH-terminal sequences and tissue expression patterns (8)
. We next wanted to examine whether any of these forms were stably translated in vivo in breast cancer cells using Western blot analysis (Fig. 2)
1 in vitro translated product was seen (Fig. 2A)
1, whereas ER-negative MDA-MB-435 cells expressed a doublet comigrating with the full-length protein of MCF-7 cells. Thus, along with full-length ER-
, isoforms are present as well. Because these isoforms were all detected by the ER 15-64 antibody that was made against the extreme NH2 terminus of full-length ER-
, the isoforms are likely to be the COOH-terminal isoforms already described at the RNA level (8)
.
|
Protein.
1 or ER-
RNA isoforms might occur during breast tumorigenesis and progression (5
, 14)
. We thus examined ER-
protein expression in five ER-positive breast tumors (Fig. 3)
1 signal in two of these tumors (breast tumors 1 and 4). A faint signal was also detectable in one other tumor (tumor 2) that comigrated with the in vitro translated ER-
1 product and the SaOS2 positive control extract.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in breast cancer cell lines and in breast tumors at the protein level. In addition, we show that the longest form of ER-
detected in cell lines derives from the 530-amino acid ORF, and that smaller isoforms also exist. The 530-amino acid length of the receptor was also seen in breast tumor samples. Thus, the extended NH2 terminus, as predicted by the full-length ER-
1 sequence, is expressed in vivo. Future studies aimed at a functional dissection of ER-
should include this form of the receptor in the studies because the presence of ER-
protein in breast cancer cells and tumors is potentially of clinical significance.
Most ER-
functional studies reported in the literature to date have used clones that express the short form of the receptor, corresponding to amino acids 54530, because this was the first human form of the receptor reported (6)
. For example, the recent report describing differences in AP-1 activity between ER-
and ER-
used the truncated form of ER-
in the studies (15)
. In such assays, in which the complete molecular details involved in determining the assay read-out are unknown, differences might be noted if the full-length receptor is not used in the study. For example, the contributions of the NH2 terminus, a region in ER-
known to contain the autonomous transactivation function AF-1 (16)
, may be critical. This is especially hard to assess at the present time because of the plethora of genomic (such as interactions with the estrogen response element in various promoter contexts in vivo) and nongenomic interactions involving the ERs. For example, Bhat et al. (17)
have found that only the 530-amino acid form of ER-
is functional in a nuclear factor
B promoter inhibition assay. A large effort is ongoing in many laboratories to determine the differences in functional profiles between ER-
and ER-
; hence, it is critical that the correct in vivo expressed form of the receptor be used in these studies. Defining the correct translational start site of ER-
is an important first step toward defining the exact molecular mechanisms involving ER-
function.
In breast tumors, ER-
RNA expression has been detected in both ER-
-positive and -negative tumors (18)
. RNA-based ER-
studies have raised the possibility that the presence of ER-
in breast tumors may be a marker of endocrine therapy responsiveness (14)
. RNA studies have also indicated that the dual presence of ER-
and ER-
RNA may correlate with a poor clinical prognosis (19)
. Furthermore, ER-
RNA expression has been shown to be inversely correlated to levels of the progesterone receptor (19)
. Our data indicate that, in fact, full-length ER-
is expressed in breast tumor cell lines and in breast cancer biopsy tissue.
In addition to full-length ER-
, we also detected truncated forms of ER-
in breast cancer cell lines. Because these ER-
translated products were detected with the ER-
antibody 15-64 (which recognizes amino acids 217 of the predicted long form of ER-
), the shorter length of these receptors is not due to downstream translation initiation but is most likely due to COOH-terminal truncations. RNA isoforms representing COOH-terminal-truncated receptors have also been reported, including ER-
2, ER-
4, and ER-
5 (6)
as well as an exon 5-deleted product (20)
, but it was not previously known whether any of these altered proteins were translated into stable products in cells. The sizes of these receptor forms are consistent with the sizes predicted from primary sequences of ER-
isoforms (6)
. Future studies using isoform-specific antibodies will be necessary to confirm and extend the details of specific isoform expression.
The presence of ER-
isoforms is potentially of clinical significance. Multiple studies have detected the presence of RNA isoforms in cancer cell lines and tumors, and more recently, it has been shown that the ratios of ER-
2:ER-
1 and ER-
5:ER-
1 RNAs correlate positively with tumor inflammation and nuclear grade, respectively (19)
. However, these RNA changes and ratios have not yet been correlated with alterations in protein isoform profiles. It will be important to determine whether a particular protein isoform overexpression is correlated with specific tumor characteristics, such as the antiestrogen-resistant phenotype.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported in part by NIH Grant CA30195 (to S. A. W. F.). ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Alkek N-550, Houston, TX 77030. ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: ER, estrogen receptor; KLH, keyhole limpet hemocyanin; TBST, Tris buffered saline + Tween [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20]; ORF, open reading frame. ![]()
4 J-L. Su, D. McKee, S. A. W. Fuqua, G. B. Wisely, S. Kadwell, J. Stimmel, and J. T. Moore. Production and characterization of ER-
-specific monoclonal antibodies, manuscript in preparation. ![]()
Received 8/ 3/99. Accepted 9/20/99.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and -
messenger RNAs as a potential marker of ovarian carcinogenesis. Cancer Res., 58: 5367-5373, 1998.
and
messenger RNA expression during human breast tumorigenesis. Cancer Res., 58: 3197-3201, 1998.
: identification and characterization of a novel human estrogen receptor. FEBS Lett., 392: 49-53, 1996.[Medline]
(hER
) and its heterodimerization with ER
in vivo and in vitro. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 243: 122-126, 1998.[Medline]
isoforms. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 247: 75-78, 1998.[Medline]
with 18 amino acid insertion in the ligand binding domain as a putative dominant negative regulator of estrogen action. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 246: 142-147, 1998.[Medline]
cx: a potential inhibitor of estrogen action in human. Nucleic Acids Res., 26: 3505-3512, 1998.
1,
2, and
5 messenger RNAs in human breast tissue. Cancer Res., 59: 1175-1179, 1999.
and ER
at AP-1 sites. Science, (Washington DC), 277: 1508-1510, 1998.
: identification and functional analysis of additional N-terminal amino acids. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol., 67: 233-240, 1998.[Medline]
in human breast tumors. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 82: 2371-2374, 1996.
messenger RNA expression in human breast tumor biopsies: relationship to steroid receptor status and regulation by progestins. Cancer Res., 59: 529-532, 1999.
messenger RNA variant in breast cancer. Cancer Res., 58: 210-214, 1998.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. A. Mattingly, M. M. Ivanova, K. A. Riggs, N. S. Wickramasinghe, M. J. Barch, and C. M. Klinge Estradiol Stimulates Transcription of Nuclear Respiratory Factor-1 and Increases Mitochondrial Biogenesis Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2008; 22(3): 609 - 622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Borgquist, C Holm, M Stendahl, L Anagnostaki, G Landberg, and K Jirstrom Oestrogen receptors {alpha} and show different associations to clinicopathological parameters and their co-expression might predict a better response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer J. Clin. Pathol., February 1, 2008; 61(2): 197 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Sugiura, T. Toyama, Y. Hara, Z. Zhang, S. Kobayashi, Y. Fujii, H. Iwase, and H. Yamashita Expression of Estrogen Receptor Wild-type and its Variant ER cx/ 2 is Correlated with Better Prognosis in Breast Cancer Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2007; 37(11): 820 - 828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Heldring, A. Pike, S. Andersson, J. Matthews, G. Cheng, J. Hartman, M. Tujague, A. Strom, E. Treuter, M. Warner, et al. Estrogen Receptors: How Do They Signal and What Are Their Targets Physiol Rev, July 1, 2007; 87(3): 905 - 931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zhao, J. Matthews, M. Tujague, J. Wan, A. Strom, G. Toresson, E. W-F. Lam, G. Cheng, J.-A. Gustafsson, and K. Dahlman-Wright Estrogen Receptor {beta}2 Negatively Regulates the Transactivation of Estrogen Receptor {alpha} in Human Breast Cancer Cells Cancer Res., April 15, 2007; 67(8): 3955 - 3962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Dahlman-Wright, V. Cavailles, S. A. Fuqua, V. C. Jordan, J. A. Katzenellenbogen, K. S. Korach, A. Maggi, M. Muramatsu, M. G. Parker, and J.-A. Gustafsson International Union of Pharmacology. LXIV. Estrogen Receptors Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2006; 58(4): 773 - 781. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Riggs, N. S. Wickramasinghe, R. K. Cochrum, M. B. Watts, and C. M. Klinge Decreased Chicken Ovalbumin Upstream Promoter Transcription Factor II Expression in Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Cancer Cells. Cancer Res., October 15, 2006; 66(20): 10188 - 10198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C Murphy and P. H Watson Is oestrogen receptor- {beta} a predictor of endocrine therapy responsiveness in human breast cancer? Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2006; 13(2): 327 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Y. Savinov, A. G. Remacle, V. S. Golubkov, M. Krajewska, S. Kennedy, M. J. Duffy, D. V. Rozanov, S. Krajewski, and A. Y. Strongin Matrix Metalloproteinase 26 Proteolysis of the NH2-Terminal Domain of the Estrogen Receptor {beta} Correlates with the Survival of Breast Cancer Patients. Cancer Res., March 1, 2006; 66(5): 2716 - 2724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Poola, S. A.W. Fuqua, R. L. De Witty, J. Abraham, J. J. Marshallack, and A. Liu Estrogen Receptor {alpha}-Negative Breast Cancer Tissues Express Significant Levels of Estrogen-Independent Transcription Factors, ER{beta}1 and ER{beta}5: Potential Molecular Targets for Chemoprevention Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 11(20): 7579 - 7585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. C. Peterson, M. D. Servinsky, A. Christian, Z. Peng, W. Qiu, J. Mann, J. Dicello, and D. L. Huso Tamoxifen resistance and Her2/neu expression in an aged, irradiated rat breast carcinoma model Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2005; 26(9): 1542 - 1552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Esslimani-Sahla, A. Kramar, J. Simony-Lafontaine, M. Warner, J.-A. Gustafsson, and H. Rochefort Increased Estrogen Receptor {beta}cx Expression during Mammary Carcinogenesis Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2005; 11(9): 3170 - 3174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L C Murphy, B Peng, A Lewis, J R Davie, E Leygue, A Kemp, K Ung, M Vendetti, and R Shiu Inducible upregulation of oestrogen receptor-{beta}1 affects oestrogen and tamoxifen responsiveness in MCF7 human breast cancer cells J. Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2005; 34(2): 553 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Klinge, K. A. Blankenship, K. E. Risinger, S. Bhatnagar, E. L. Noisin, W. K. Sumanasekera, L. Zhao, D. M. Brey, and R. S. Keynton Resveratrol and Estradiol Rapidly Activate MAPK Signaling through Estrogen Receptors {alpha} and {beta} in Endothelial Cells J. Biol. Chem., March 4, 2005; 280(9): 7460 - 7468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ring and M. Dowsett Mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2004; 11(4): 643 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Hopp, H. L. Weiss, I. S. Parra, Y. Cui, C. K. Osborne, and S. A. W. Fuqua Low Levels of Estrogen Receptor {beta} Protein Predict Resistance to Tamoxifen Therapy in Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2004; 10(22): 7490 - 7499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Martin de las Mulas, J. Ordas, M. Y. Millan, F. Chacon, M. De Lara, A. Espinosa de los Monteros, C. Reymundo, and A. Jover Immunohistochemical Expression of Estrogen Receptor {beta} in Normal and Tumoral Canine Mammary Glands Vet. Pathol., May 1, 2004; 41(3): 269 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Ramsey, K. E. Risinger, S. C. Jernigan, K. A. Mattingly, and C. M. Klinge Estrogen Receptor {beta} Isoforms Exhibit Differences in Ligand-Activated Transcriptional Activity in an Estrogen Response Element Sequence-Dependent Manner Endocrinology, January 1, 2004; 145(1): 149 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Patrone, T. N. Cassel, K. Pettersson, Y.-S. Piao, G. Cheng, P. Ciana, A. Maggi, M. Warner, J.-A. Gustafsson, and M. Nord Regulation of Postnatal Lung Development and Homeostasis by Estrogen Receptor {beta} Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2003; 23(23): 8542 - 8552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sapino, P. Cassoni, E. Ferrero, M. Bongiovanni, L. Righi, N. Fortunati, P. Crafa, R. Chiarle, and G. Bussolati Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Is a Novel Marker Expressed by Follicular Dendritic Cells in Lymph Nodes and Tumor-Associated Lymphoid Infiltrates Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2003; 163(4): 1313 - 1320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Matthews and J.-A. Gustafsson Estrogen Signaling: A Subtle Balance Between ER{alpha} and ER{beta} Mol. Interv., August 1, 2003; 3(5): 281 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. R. Bianco, G. Perry, M. A. Smith, D. J. Templeton, and M. M. Montano Functional Implications of Antiestrogen Induction of Quinone Reductase: Inhibition of Estrogen-Induced Deoxyribonucleic Acid Damage Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2003; 17(7): 1344 - 1355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. W. Fuqua, R. Schiff, I. Parra, J. T. Moore, S. K. Mohsin, C. K. Osborne, G. M. Clark, and D. C. Allred Estrogen Receptor {beta} Protein in Human Breast Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Tumor Parameters Cancer Res., May 15, 2003; 63(10): 2434 - 2439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wu, Y. Wu, B. Gathings, M. Wan, X. Li, W. Grizzle, Z. Liu, C. Lu, Z. Mao, and X. Cao Smad4 as a Transcription Corepressor for Estrogen Receptor alpha J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2003; 278(17): 15192 - 15200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. D. Johnston, J. Head, S. Pancholi, S. Detre, L.-A. Martin, I. E. Smith, and M. Dowsett Integration of Signal Transduction Inhibitors with Endocrine Therapy: An Approach to Overcoming Hormone Resistance in Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2003; 9(1): 524S - 532S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Brownson, N. G. Azios, B. K. Fuqua, S. F. Dharmawardhane, and T. J. Mabry Flavonoid Effects Relevant to Cancer J. Nutr., November 1, 2002; 132(11): 3482S - 3489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. T. K. Saunders, M. R. Millar, S. Macpherson, D. S. Irvine, N. P. Groome, L. R. Evans, R. M. Sharpe, and G. A. Scobie ER{beta}1 and the ER{beta}2 Splice Variant (ER{beta}cx/{beta}2) Are Expressed in Distinct Cell Populations in the Adult Human Testis J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2002; 87(6): 2706 - 2715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Gadd, G. Hobbs, and M. R. Miller Acetaminophen-Induced Proliferation of Estrogen-Responsive Breast Cancer Cells Is Associated with Increases in c-myc RNA Expression and NF-{kappa}B Activity Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2002; 66(2): 233 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Pepe, R. B. Billiar, M. G. Leavitt, N. C. Zachos, J. A. Gustafsson, and E. D. Albrecht Expression of Estrogen Receptors {alpha} and {beta} in the Baboon Fetal Ovary Biol Reprod, April 1, 2002; 66(4): 1054 - 1060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. V. Jensen, G. Cheng, C. Palmieri, S. Saji, S. Makela, S. Van Noorden, T. Wahlstrom, M. Warner, R. C. Coombes, and J.-A. Gustafsson Estrogen receptors and proliferation markers in primary and recurrent breast cancer PNAS, November 29, 2001; (2001) 211556298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Saji, H. Sakaguchi, S. Andersson, M. Warner, and J.-A. Gustafsson Quantitative Analysis of Estrogen Receptor Proteins in Rat Mammary Gland Endocrinology, July 1, 2001; 142(7): 3177 - 3186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. Horvath, S. M. Henshall, C-S. Lee, D. R. Head, D. I. Quinn, S. Makela, W. Delprado, D. Golovsky, P. C. Brenner, G. O'Neill, et al. Frequent Loss of Estrogen Receptor-{beta} Expression in Prostate Cancer Cancer Res., July 1, 2001; 61(14): 5331 - 5335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |