Cancer Research Donn Young Sign up for Cancer Research eTOC's
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
[Cancer Research 59, 5662-5665, November 1, 1999]
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Qin, L.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Guan, X.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Qin, L.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Guan, X.-Y.
[Cancer Research 59, 5662-5665, November 15, 1999]
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research

Advances in Brief

The Association of Chromosome 8p Deletion and Tumor Metastasis in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma1

Lun-Xiu Qin, Zhao-You Tang, Jonathan S. T. Sham, Zeng-Chen Ma, Sheng-Long Ye, Xin-Da Zhou, Zhi-Quan Wu, Jeffrey M. Trent and Xin-Yuan Guan2

Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical University, Shanghai, Peoples Republic of China [L-X. Q., Z-Y. T., Z-C. M., S-L. Y., X-D. Z., Z-Q. W.]; Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong [J. S. T. S., X-Y. G.]; and Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland [J. M. T.]


   ABSTRACT
Top
 ABSTRACT
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
To understand the genetic mechanisms underlying the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) metastasis, differences of genomic alterations between 10 pairs of primary HCC tumors and their matched metastatic lesions were analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization. Several chromosomal alterations including loss of 8p, 4q, 17p, and 19p, gain of 5p and high-level amplification of 1q12-q22 were detected in two or more cases. The most significant finding is the loss of 8p which was detected in 8 metastatic tumors but only in 3 corresponding primary tumors (P = 0.03). This result suggests that the deletion of chromosome 8p might contribute to the development of HCC metastasis. Another interesting result is the detection of a minimum high-level amplification region at 1q12-q22 in HCC. This result provides a candidate amplification region in HCC for further study to identify amplified oncogenes related to the development or progression of HCC. Finally, this study provides a practicable model to detect specific genetic alterations related to the tumor metastasis through comparing the primary tumor and its corresponding metastatic lesion using comparative genomic hybridization technique.


   Introduction
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
HCC3 is one of the most frequently occurring human cancers worldwide and has been ranked as the second cancer killer in China since the 1990s (1 , 2) . Although encouraging long-term survivals of HCC patients have been obtained in some clinical centers, HCC carries a very poor prognosis. One of the major reasons of the poor prognosis is the recurrence and metastasis after surgery. It has been reported that the 5-year recurrent rate of HCC after resection is higher than 50% with most of the recurrences due to invasion-related spreading (1, 2, 3) . Thus, understanding the metastatic mechanisms of HCC becomes an imperative. Many efforts have been made to explore the mechanisms involved in the recurrence and metastasis of HCC, however, the genetic events involved in the HCC metastasis is still unclear (1, 2, 3) .

Recently, the genomic alterations in HCC have been studied by CGH, and several recurrent chromosome changes have been reported (4 , 5) . The gain of 1q, 8q, and 20q and the loss of 16q, 4q, 17p, 1p, and 8p were commonly detected in HCC. The relationship between these recurrent alterations and the clinical phenotypes is still unknown. A considerable amount of genetic alterations on solid tumors has been documented during the last seven years since the CGH technique was developed (6) , however, only a few of these genetic alterations have been associated with the metastatic phenotype (7, 8, 9) . It has been shown that the progression from the primary tumor to metastasis is due either to the acquisition of additional genetic changes or to the alteration of regulatory processes without DNA changes (7, 8, 9) .

We hypothesized that the progression from the primary tumor to metastasis in HCC may also be due to the acquisition of further genetic change(s) that inactivate the tumor suppressor gene(s) or activate the expression of oncogene(s) related to the tumor metastasis. To detect the specific chromosome alterations related to HCC metastasis, the differences of genomic changes between 10 primary HCC tumors and their corresponding metastatic lesions were analyzed by CGH.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Tumor Specimens and DNA Extraction.
Ten pairs of untreated primary HCC tumors and their corresponding metastatic lesions (thrombosis in portal vein or bile duct or intrahepatic spreading nodules) were collected at the time of surgical resections from the Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical University (Shanghai, China). Among the 10 samples of metastases, 5 cases were tumor thromboses in the portal vein (which is one of the most common places of HCC spreading), 2 thromboses in the bile duct, 2 intrahepatic spreading nodules, and 1 spreading nodule in the abdomen cavity. All of the primary tumors and their metastases were histologically proven to be HCC. The clinical and pathological characteristics of the patients and the tumors are summarized in Table 1Citation . The specimens were frozen in liquid nitrogen within 30 min after surgical resection and stored at -80°C until DNA extraction.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1 The clinical and pathological characteristics of the patients studied

 
Genomic DNA was extracted from the tumor samples with a proteinase K/SDS digestion and phenol/chloroform/isoamylalcohol extraction. Normal reference DNA was prepared from peripheral blood lymphocytes of healthy donors.

CGH.
Metaphases were prepared following standard procedures from peripheral blood lymphocytes of a healthy male donor. The slides with the metaphase spreads were stored at room temperature until use. CGH was performed essentially as described by Kallioniemi et al. (10) . Briefly, 1 µg of genomic DNA from a HCC tumor sample and a sex-matched normal reference was labeled directly with Spectrum green-dUTP and Spectrum red-dUTP (Vysis, Downers Grove, IL), respectively, by nick translation. Three hundred to 500 ng of labeled tumor DNA and normal DNA probes were used in a 10-µl hybridization mixture (containing 55% formamide, 2x SSC, and 10 µg of human Cot I DNA), which was denatured at 75°C for 5 min. The slide containing normal metaphase spreads was treated with RNase (100 µg/ml) at 37°C for 1 h and then denatured at 75°C in 70% formamide and 2x SSC for 5 min. Hybridization with probes was then carried out at 37°C in a moist chamber for 48 h. The slide was then washed in 0.4x SSC/0.3% NP40 at 75°C for 2 min and then in 2x SSC/0.1% NP40 at room temperature for 2 min. After the washing, the slide was counterstained with 1 µg/ml DAPI in an antifade solution.

Digital Image Analysis.
The hybridized metaphase chromosomes were analyzed using a digital image analysis system containing a Zeiss Axiophot microscope equipped with a Metachrome II cooled-charged device camera (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Three images of each metaphase were captured using filter wheel-mounted, single-band excitation Rhodamine, FITC, and DAPI filters. The image analyses were carried out using Quips CGH program (Vysis, Downers Grove, IL). Five metaphases were analyzed to generate fluorescent ratio profiles in each case. Interpretation of the profiles was performed according to the program guidelines.


   Results
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
CGH analysis was carried out on 10 primary HCC tumors and their corresponding metastatic lesions. The copy-number changes for the entire genome detected in these 10 primary HCC and their corresponding metastatic lesions are summarized in Table 2Citation . The most frequently detected sites of chromosome gain were 1q (10 of 10 cases in both primary HCC and their corresponding metastatic tumors), 8q (6 of 10 in primary tumors and 7 of 10 in metastatic tumors), and 5p (3 of 10 in primary tumors and 5 of 10 in metastatic tumors). High copy-number amplification of 1q with a minimum region at 1q12-q22 was detected in four primary tumors and six metastatic tumors, respectively. In Cases 8 and 10, low copy-number gain of 1q12-q22 were detected in primary tumors. Compared to their corresponding primary tumors, the copy number of 1q12-q22 increased dramatically in metastatic tumors (Fig. 1E)Citation . Another high copy-number amplification, detected only in metastatic tumor but not in its corresponding primary tumor, is the 12q15-q21 amplification in Case 2 (Fig. 1B)Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2 Summary of genomic alterations in 10 pairs of primary and metastatic HCC detected by CGH

 


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 1. Average ratio profiles of the differences of chromosome alterations between primary and metastatic HCC detected by CGH. Ratio profiles of Spectrum green tumor (DNA) and Spectrum-red (normal reference DNA) fluorescence are shown to the right of chromosome ideograms. The intensity ratio of a balanced copy number is 1.0 (central vertical line). The left-side shift indicates underrepresentations (value, 0.75) whereas the right-side shift indicates overrepresentations (value, 1.25). Representative examples of fluorescent ratio image of CGH are shown to the left of the chromosome ideograms. Loss of 8p in metastatic but not in primary HCC was detected in Cases 1 (A), 2 (B, upper), 5 (C), 8 (D), and 10 (E, upper). Left profiles represent primary HCC (P), and right profiles represent metastatic HCC (M). In Case 2, high copy-number amplification of 12q15-q21 was detected in metastatic HCC but not in primary tumor (B, bottom). Example of the high copy-number amplification of 1q12-q22 detected only in metastatic HCC is shown in Case 10 (E, bottom).

 
Commonly detected sites of chromosomal material loss were 4q (in 7 of 10 primary tumors and 9 of 10 metastatic tumors), 8p (in 3 of 10 primary tumors and 8 of 10 metastatic tumors), 17p (in 5 of 10 primary tumors and 7 of 10 metastatic tumors), 1p (6 of 10 in both primary tumors and metastatic tumors) with a minimum deleted region at 1pter-p35, 19p (in 4 of 10 primary tumors and 6 of 10 metastatic tumors), and 16q (in 4 of 10 primary tumors and 5 of 10 metastatic tumors). The most significant difference between primary tumors and their corresponding metastatic lesions in this study is the deletion of 8p (P = 0.03). Fig. 1Citation shows that deletion of 8p was detected only in metastatic tumors but not in their corresponding primary tumors in Cases 1, 2, 5, 8, and 10.

All of the CGH results mentioned above were derived from comparing either primary tumor or metastatic tumor with normal reference DNA from healthy donors. To confirm the CGH results, a direct CGH comparison was performed between primary tumor and its corresponding metastatic tumor in all of the cases. The results showed an identical pattern of chromosome gain and loss as the combination of separate CGH with primary and metastatic tumors (Fig. 2)Citation . For example, chromosome 3 was detected as a loss in the primary tumor in Case 1, with no change in its corresponding metastatic tumor. When directly comparing the primary tumor (labeled with Spectrum Red) with its corresponding metastatic tumor (labeled with Spectrum Green) by CGH, loss of chromosome 3 in the primary tumor was detected as a relative gain of chromosome 3 in the metastatic tumor (Fig. 2A)Citation . Loss of 8p and gain of 8q was detected in both primary tumor and its corresponding metastatic tumor in Case 6. So, no change was detected at chromosome 8 when primary tumor was compared with its corresponding metastatic tumor (Fig. 2B)Citation .



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 2. Representative examples of the confirmation of CGH results by directly comparing primary HCC tumor with its corresponding metastatic tumor. In Case 1 (A, upper), chromosome 3 was detected as a loss in primary tumor (left), with no change in metastatic tumor (central) when normal reference DNA was compared. When comparing primary tumor (labeled with Spectrum red, dUTP) with its corresponding metastatic tumor (labeled with Spectrum green, dUTP) directly, the loss of chromosome 3 in primary tumor was detected as a relative gain in metastatic tumor (right). The loss of 8p was detected in metastatic tumor in Case 1 (A, bottom) when primary tumor DNA (right) or normal reference DNA (central) was compared. No 8p change was detected in primary tumor (left). In Case 6 (B), the loss of 8p and the gain of 8q were detected in both the primary tumor (left) and its corresponding metastatic tumor (central) when normal reference DNA was compared. No change was detected when the primary tumor (labeled with Spectrum red, dUTP) was compared directly with its corresponding metastatic tumor (labeled with Spectrum green, dUTP; right).

 

   Discussion
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
REFERENCES
 
The importance of chromosomal abnormalities in tumor development and progression has been known since pioneering cytogenetic studies successfully defined recurrent chromosome changes in specific types of tumors (11) . In the course of carcinogenesis, cells experience several genetic alterations that are associated with the transition from a preneoplastic lesion to an invasive tumor and finally to the metastatic state. Many studies on the cytogenetic aberrations of HCC have been performed using CGH and LOH analysis. Several recurrent chromosome alterations have been detected, including the gain of 1q, 8q, and 20q, and the loss of 4q, 16q, 1p, 17p, and 8p (4 , 5) . However, little is known about the relationship between these recurrent chromosome changes and the metastasis phenotypes of HCC. In this study, we analyzed 10 pairs of primary HCC tumors and their corresponding metastatic lesions by CGH to identify specific chromosome alterations related to the metastasis phenotype in HCC. The majority of the chromosomal aberrations detected in this study in both primary and metastatic HCC were consistent with those in previous reports.

The most interesting finding in this study is the deletion of 8p that was detected in eight metastatic tumors but in only three corresponding primary tumors. In the present study, the difference in 8p deletion between primary and metastatic lesions of HCC is significant (30% versus 80%; P = 0.03), compared with the other differences of genomic alterations between primary tumor and its corresponding metastatic tumor. This suggests that 8p may harbor a putative tumor suppressor gene that plays an important role in the HCC progression especially in the tumor metastasis. LOH studies have demonstrated that the loss of 8p is frequently detected in many other tumors including breast, prostate, and ovarian cancers (12, 13, 14) . In colorectal cancer, deletion of 8p was detected as a late event in the multistep model of colorectal carcinogenesis and was significantly correlated with the invasion of lymphatics, vessels, or perineurium (15) . Another study has shown that the loss of 8p is associated with tumor metastasis in renal cell carcinoma (16) . Several very small overlapping deleted regions on 8p have been detected in a variety of cancers including those of prostate, breast, ovarian, colon, renal cell, and liver (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17) . Most of those small overlapping deleted regions on 8p were localized on 8p12-p22. Several candidate tumor suppressor genes have been mapped to 8p including the DLC-1 (8p21.3-p22; Ref. 18 ) and FEZ1 (8p22; Ref. 19 ).

Another interesting finding in this study is the detection of the minimum high-level amplification region on 1q12–22. The gain of 1q is one of the most frequently chromosomal changes in HCC detected by CGH (4 , 5) . In most cases, the gain of 1q involved the whole long arm. In the present study, high copy-number amplification on 1q was detected in four primary tumors and six metastatic tumors, with a minimum overlapping amplified region at 1q12-q22 (Table 2)Citation . Most interestingly, in two cases (Cases 8 and 10), the high-level amplification of 1q12-q22 was detected only in metastatic tumors. This implies that the overexpression of an oncogene(s) at 1q12-q22 confers a selective advantage in HCC. The gain of 1q may be one of the early genetic changes in HCC because it was one of the most commonly detected alterations in HCC. However, high copy-number amplification of 1q12–22 may occur only in the later stage of HCC and provide more advantage of growth selection. The amplification of 1q was also commonly observed in breast cancer, colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, and lipoma-like liposarcoma (20, 21, 22, 23) . In one study, high copy-number amplification at 1q21-q24 was detected in 3 of 26 cases of bladder cancer (22) . In another study, a minimum amplified region at 1q21-q23 was observed in four of eight cases with lipoma-like liposarcoma (23) . This suggests that 1q may harbor one or more oncogenes related to the development or progression of many cancers. Moreover, this finding provides a candidate minimum amplification region at 1q12-q22 for further study and gene cloning.

In some cases, the gain or loss of some chromosomal regions, such as the gain of 3p and the loss of 18q12-qter in Case 4, was detected only in primary tumors but not in their corresponding metastatic lesions (Table 2)Citation . It is known that one tumor is composed of many subpopulations. There are many differences in genomic alterations among these subpopulations. One subpopulation contains a genomic change that provides the population with a selection advantage. This subpopulation may become a dominant population in the tumor and its genomic changes can be detected by CGH technique. Genomic changes in many nondominant subpopulations may not be able to be detected by CGH. Genetic alterations related to tumor metastasis may occur in both dominant populations and nondominant populations. This may explain why some genomic alterations in this study were detected only in the primary tumor but not in its corresponding metastatic tumor.

In conclusion, by using the CGH technique to compare the difference in chromosomal aberrations between the primary tumor and its metastatic tumor of HCC, we found that the deletion of chromosomes 8p may have contributed to the metastasis of HCC. This suggests that 8p may harbor a novel tumor suppressor gene that plays an important role in HCC metastasis. Fine-mapping analyses using the LOH technique will be applied to narrow down the critical deletion region and to provide a candidate region for gene cloning. Further study of the 8p deletion may also provide a clinically useful prognostic marker in HCC. Finally, this study provides a practicable model to detect specific genetic change related to tumor metastasis by comparing the primary tumor with its corresponding metastatic tumor using the CGH technique.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Drs. J. Fan, Q. H. Ye, H. C. Sun, Y. Yu, J. Zhou, Q. Niu, and L. H. Zhang for their help in collecting tumor specimens.


   FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This study is supported in part by the International Cancer Technology Transfer Award of Union Internationale Contre le Cancer Fellowship, Chinese National Outstanding Young Scientist Award (No. 39825511), and the Medical Key Project of Shanghai, China. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Room 118, Professorial Block, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong. E-mail: xyguan{at}hkucc.hku.hk Back

3 The abbreviations used are: HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; CGH, comparative genomic hybridization; LOH, loss of heterozygosity. Back

Received 7/12/99. Accepted 10/ 4/99.


   REFERENCES
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Tang Z. Y., Yu Y. Q., Zhou X. D., Ma Z. C., Wu Z. Q. Progress and prospects in hepatocellular carcinoma surgery. Ann. Chir. (Paris), 52: 558-563, 1998.
  2. Tang Z. Y. Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Digestion, 59: 556-562, 1998.[Medline]
  3. Tang Z. Y., Qin L. X., Wang X. M., Zhou G., Liao Y., Weng Y., Jiang X. P., Lin Z. Y., Liu K. D., Ye S. L. Alterations of oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, and growth factors in hepatocellular carcinoma: with relation to tumor size and invasiveness. Chin. Med. J. (Engl. Ed.), 111: 313-318, 1998.[Medline]
  4. Marchio A., Meddeb M., Pineau P., Danglot G., Tiollais P., Bernheim A., Dejean A. Recurrent chromosomal abnormalities in hepatocellular carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 18: 59-65, 1997.[Medline]
  5. Wong N., Lai P., Lee S. W., Fan S., Pang E., Liew C. T., Sheng Z., Lau J. W., Johnson P. J. Assessment of genetic changes in hepatocellular carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization analysis: relationship to disease stage, tumor size, and cirrhosis. Am. J. Pathol., 154: 37-43, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kallioniemi A., Kallioniemi O-P., Sudar D., Rutovitz D., Gray J. W., Waldman F., Pinkel D. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science (Washington DC), 258: 818-821, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Bockmuhl U., Petersen S., Schmidt S., Wolf G., Jahnke V., Dietel M., Petersen I. Patterns of chromosomal alterations in metastasizing and nonmetastasizing primary head and neck carcinomas. Cancer Res., 57: 5214-5216, 1997.
  8. Schwendel A., Langerck H., Reichel M., Schrock E., Ried T., Dietel M., Petersen I. Primary small-cell lung carcinomas and their metastases are characterized by a recurrent pattern of genetic alterations. Int. J. Cancer, 74: 86-93, 1997.[Medline]
  9. Nishizaki T., Devries S., Chew K., Goodson W. K., III, Ljung B. M., Thor A., Waldman F. M. Genetic alterations in primary breast cancers and their metastases: direct comparison using modified comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 19: 267-272, 1997.[Medline]
  10. Kallinoiemi A., Kallioniemi O. P., Piper J., Tanner M., Stokke T., Chen L., Smith H. S., Pinkel D., Gray J. W. Detection and mapping of amplified DNA sequences in breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91: 2156-2160, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Cobaleda C., Perez-Losada J., Sanchez-Garcia I. Chromosomal abnormalities and tumor development: from genes to therapeutic mechanisms. BioEssays, 20: 922-930, 1998.[Medline]
  12. Perinchery G., Bukurov N., Nakajima K., Chang J., Hooda M., Oh B. R., Dahiya R. Loss of two new loci on chromosome 8 (8p23 and 8q12–13) in human prostate cancer. Int. J. Oncol., 14: 495-500, 1999.[Medline]
  13. Yokota T., Yoshimoto M., Akiyama F., Sakamoto G., Kasumi F., Nakamura Y., Emi M. Localization of a tumor suppressor gene associated with the progression of human breast carcinoma within a 1-cM interval of 8p22–p23.1. Cancer (Philadelphia), 85: 447-452, 1999.[Medline]
  14. Wright K., Wilson P. J., Kerr J., Do K., Hurst T., Khoo S. K., Ward B., Chenevix-Trench G. Frequent loss of heterozygosity and three critical regions on the short arm of chromosome 8 in ovarian adenocarcinomas. Oncogene, 17: 1185-1188, 1998.[Medline]
  15. Takanishi D. M., Jr., Kim S. Y., Kelemen P. R., Yaremko M. L., Kim A. H., Ramesar J. E., Horrigan S. K., Montag A., Michelassi F., Westbrook C. A. Chromosome 8 losses in colorectal carcinoma: localization and correlation with invasive disease. Mol. Diagn., 2: 3-10, 1997.[Medline]
  16. Bissig H., Richter J., Desper R., Meier V., Schraml P., Schaffer A. A., Sauter G., Mihatsch M. J., Moch H. Evaluation of the clonal relationship between primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization. Am. J. Pathol., 155: 267-274, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Piao Z., Kim N. G., Kim H., Park C. Deletion mapping on the short arm of chromosome 8 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett., 138: 227-232, 1999.[Medline]
  18. Yuan B. Z., Miller M. J., Keck C. L., Zimonjic D. B., Thorgeirsson S. S., Popescu N. C. Cloning, characterization, and chromosomal localization of a gene frequently deleted in human liver cancer (DLC-1) homologous to rat RhoGAP. Cancer Res., 58: 2196-2199, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Ishii H., Baffa R., Numata S. I., Murakumo Y., Rattan S., Inoue H., Mori M., Fidanza V., Alder H., Croce C. M. The FEZ1 gene at chromosome 8p22 encodes a leucine-zipper protein, and its expression is altered in multiple human tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 3928-3933, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Guan X-Y., Meltzer P. S., Dalton W. S., Trent J. M. Identification of cryptic sites of DNA sequence amplification in human breast cancer by chromosome microdissection. Nat. Genet., 8: 155-161, 1994.[Medline]
  21. Ried T., Knutzen R., Steinbeck R., Blegen H., Schrock E., Heselmeyer K., du Manoir S., Auer G. Comparative genomic hybridization reveals a specific pattern of chromosomal gains and losses during the genesis of colorectal tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 15: 234-245, 1996.[Medline]
  22. Simon R., Burger H., Brinkschmidt C., Bocker W., Hertle L., Terpe H. J. Chromosomal aberations associated with invasion in papillary superficial bladder cancer. J. Pathol., 185: 345-351, 1998.[Medline]
  23. Szymanska J., Virolainen M., Tarkkanen M., Wiklund T., Asko-Seljavaara S., Tukiainen E., Elomaa I., Blomqvist C., Knuutila S. Overrepresentation of 1q21–23 and 12q13–21 in lipoma-like liposarcomas but not in benign lipomas: a comparative genomic hybridization study. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet., 99: 14-18, 1997.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
J. M.-F. Lee, C.-M. Wong, and I. O.-L. Ng
Hepatitis B Virus-Associated Multistep Hepatocarcinogenesis: A Stepwise Increase in Allelic Alterations
Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 68(14): 5988 - 5996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J.-Z. Pang, L.-X. Qin, N. Ren, Z.-Y. Hei, Q.-H. Ye, W.-D. Jia, B.-S. Sun, G.-L. Lin, D.-Y. Liu, Y.-K. Liu, et al.
Loss of Heterozygosity at D8S298 Is a Predictor for Long-term Survival of Patients with Tumor-Node-Metastasis Stage I of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2007; 13(24): 7363 - 7369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
Y. Shen, Q. Xu, Z. Han, H. Liu, and G.-B. Zhou
Analysis of phenotype-genotype connection: the story of dissecting disease pathogenesis in genomic era in China, and beyond
Phil Trans R Soc B, June 29, 2007; 362(1482): 1043 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BloodHome page
F. Rubio-Moscardo, D. Blesa, C. Mestre, R. Siebert, T. Balasas, A. Benito, A. Rosenwald, J. Climent, J. I. Martinez, M. Schilhabel, et al.
Characterization of 8p21.3 chromosomal deletions in B-cell lymphoma: TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 as candidate dosage-dependent tumor suppressor genes
Blood, November 1, 2005; 106(9): 3214 - 3222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
G. M. Caldwell, C. Jones, K. Gensberg, S. Jan, R. G. Hardy, P. Byrd, S. Chughtai, Y. Wallis, G. M. Matthews, and D. G. Morton
The Wnt Antagonist sFRP1 in Colorectal Tumorigenesis
Cancer Res., February 1, 2004; 64(3): 883 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Pathol.Home page
N. Wong, W.-C. Lam, P. B.-S. Lai, E. Pang, W.-Y. Lau, and P. J. Johnson
Hypomethylation of Chromosome 1 Heterochromatin DNA Correlates with q-Arm Copy Gain in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Am. J. Pathol., August 1, 2001; 159(2): 465 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
I. O.-l. Ng, Z.-d. Liang, L. Cao, and T. K.-w. Lee
DLC-1 Is Deleted in Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Exerts Inhibitory Effects on the Proliferation of Hepatoma Cell Lines with Deleted DLC-1
Cancer Res., December 1, 2000; 60(23): 6581 - 6584.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
N. Wong, P. Lai, E. Pang, L.-F. Fung, Z. Sheng, V. Wong, W. Wang, Y. Hayashi, E. Perlman, S. Yuna, et al.
Genomic Aberrations in Human Hepatocellular Carcinomas of Differing Etiologies
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2000; 6(10): 4000 - 4009.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Qin, L.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Guan, X.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Qin, L.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Guan, X.-Y.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online